Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: supreme court of india Year: 2004 Page 3 of about 108 results (0.101 seconds)

Apr 27 2004 (SC)

State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Asha Arun Gawali and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-27-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC2223; 2004CriLJ2484; JT2004(Suppl1)SC312; 2004(5)SCALE121; (2004)5SCC175

..... names of visitors who allegedly were a part of the conspiracy warranting detention of the detenu were not in the list of visitors during the concerned period, there is a patent admission about people getting unauthorised entry into the jails without their names being recorded in the official records something which would be impossible except with the connivance of those who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2004 (SC)

Narayanan Vs. Kumaran and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-16-2004

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1711(SC); (SCSuppl)2004(3)CHN133; 98(2004)CLT286(SC); 2004(3)CTC130; [2004(2)JCR198(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC358; 2004(2)KLT312(SC); (2004)4MLJ60(SC); RLW2004(3)SC386; 20

..... court. the high court of kerala in the instant case has not framed any substantial question of law as required by section 100 c.p.c. and has committed a patent error in disposing of the civil misc. appeal. the existence of a substantial question of law is thus the sine qua non for exercise of the jurisdiction under the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2004 (SC)

State of Orissa Through Kumar Raghvendra Singh and ors. Vs. Ganesh Cha ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-24-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC2179; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)729; 2004(2)BLJR863; 2004CriLJ2011; 2004(2)CTC467; JT2004(4)SC52; 2004(I)OLR621; RLW2004(2)SC218; 2004(3)SCALE608; (2004)8SCC40

..... complaint and the materials on record are there, we do not think it necessary to go into them because of the inherent improbabilities of the complainant's case and the patent mala fides involved. it is no doubt true that the threshold interference by exercise of jurisdiction under section 482 of the code has to be in very rare cases, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2004 (SC)

icpa Health Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vado ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-20-2004

Reported in : 2004(93)ECC441; 2004(167)ELT20(SC); 2004(4)SCALE820; (2004)4SCC481

..... of surgeons for rapid hand disinfections prior to surgery.5. at this stage, the two tariff items may be set out. tariff item 3003.10 reads as follows:'3003.10 - patent or proprietary medicaments, other thanthose medicaments which are exclusivelyayurvedic, unani, siddha, homoeopathic or bio-chemic.'tariff item no. 38.08 reads as follows:'3003.08 - insecticides, rodenticides, fungicides, herbicides,anti .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2004 (SC)

Registrar, High Court of Gujarat and anr. Vs. C.G. Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-17-2004

Reported in : AIR2005SC344; 2004(5)CTC525; 2005(3)ESC346; (2005)1GLR649; JT2004(9)SC602; 2004(9)SCALE478; (2005)1SCC132; 2005(2)SLJ104(SC); (2005)1UPLBEC313

..... in law in permitting the respondent on second thought to address the court on merits about the standard of assessment of his performance. even in the memorandum of the letters patent appeal, the point that the high court had not applied the correct standard of assessment of the performance was not raised. the reasoning assigned by the division bench is, therefore ..... work done by him in comparison to his other colleagues when this point was not argued before the learned single judge or even raised in the memorandum of the letters patent appeal. the learned single judge has expressly indicated in his judgment that no other points were urged save and except about the interpretation of the relevant rule. the division bench ..... the question of assessment of satisfactory performance of the work done by him as a civil judge. mr. l.n.rao, however, submitted that while exercising the power under letters patent appeal, the court is exercising the power under article 226 of the constitution of india. it is not sitting in appeal over the decision of the high court on the ..... (b) a government servant becomes eligible for being confirmed. holding so, the petition filed by mr. c.g. sharma was dismissed.6. being aggrieved, mr. c.g. sharma preferred letters patent appeal assailing the judgment of the learned single judge on three grounds:1) the first ground was that with the expiry of the period of two years of probation in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2004 (SC)

Madhya Pradesh Special Police Establishment Vs. State of Madhya Prades ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-2004

Reported in : AIR2005SC325; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)262; 2005(1)ALD57(SC); 2004(5)CTC454; [2005(1)JCR98(SC)]; 2004(3)KLT856(SC); 2005(1)MPHT425; 2004(9)SCALE302; (2004)8SCC788; 2005(1)LC165(SC)

..... invoked on the facts of the case to enable the governor to act in his discretion.7. the appellants filed two letters patent appeals which have been disposed off by the impugned judgment. the division bench dismissed the letters patent appeals upholding the reasoning and judgment of the single judge. it must be mentioned that the authority of this court in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (SC)

Metroark Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : 2004(92)ECC489; 2004(164)ELT225(SC); (2004)12SCC505

..... ) ...... (b) ...... (c) medicaments (heading no. 30.03)' 4.1.5 heading no. 30.03 & sub-heading no. 3003.20 30.03 medicaments (including veterinary medicaments). 3003.20 medicaments (other than patent or proprietary) nilother than those which are exclusively used in ayurvedic,unani, siddha, homeopathic or bio-chemic systems. 4.1.6 note 2(i) to chapter 30 2. for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2004 (SC)

The Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Ranchi and anr. Vs. Swarn Rekha Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)BLJR114; [2005(1)JCR166(SC)]; JT2004(Suppl1)SC608; 2004(5)SCALE596; (2004)6SCC689; [2004]136STC57(SC)

..... fact that the state of jharkhand itself sought to prefer an appeal against the order of the learned single judge and in fact preferred a letters patent appeal and contested the claim of the respondents. it did not object to the jurisdiction of the high court at patna to entertain the writ petition ..... precedent. the state of jharkhand has preferred s.l.p.(c) no. 13401/2003 challenging the judgment and order of the high court in the letters patent appeal.6. civil appeal no. 2450/2003 has been preferred by the associated cement companies ltd. which was the writ petitioner before the high court in ..... batch of writ petitions by his judgment and order of july 18, 2002. the said judgment of the learned single judge was challenged in a letters patent appeal preferred by the state of jharkhand being l.p.a. no. 102/2003. a division bench of the high court dismissed the same by its ..... the state of jharkhand granted a similar exemption, the respondent was bound to pay tax and remit the same to the state of jharkhand. the letters patent appeal was dismissed by the high court by its judgment and order of april 2, 2002 upholding the contention of the respondent and finding them entitled ..... by a learned single judge of the high court. the commissioner, commercial taxes, ranchi, however impugned the judgment of the learned single judge by filing letters patent appeal no. 204 of 2002. according to him after bifurcation of the erstwhile state of bihar, the benefit of exemption from payment of sales tax on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (SC)

The State of West Bengal Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(SC)219; [2004]266ITR721(SC); JT2004(1)SC375; 2004(1)SCALE425; (2004)10SCC201

..... to mean, "land ofwhatever description ... and includes all benefits to arise out of land".lands held for carrying on mining operations would be taken in by the saiddefinition. it is patently clear that 'minerals', which are benefitsarising out of land, will be roped in within the purview of the levy undersection 3(1) read with section 2(c) of the act ..... a grantor or lessor, on the working of the property leased, or otherwise on the profits of the grant of lease. the word is especially used in reference to mines/ patents and copyrights."prem's judicial dictionary (1992, vol. 2, page 1458) - "royalties are payments which the government may demand for the appropriation of minerals, timber or other property belonging to ..... the demised mineral worked within a specified period"wharton's law lexicon (fourteenth edition, page 893) - "royalty, payment to a patentee by agreement on every article made according to his patent; or to an author by a publisher on every copy of his book sold; or to the owner of minerals for the right of working the same on every ton ..... , that part of the reddendum which is variable, and depends upon the quantity of minerals gotten or the agreed payment to a patentee on every article made according to the patent. rights or privileges for which remuneration is payable in the form of a royalty"words and phrases, legally defined (third edition, 1990, vol.4, page 112) - "a royalty, in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 2004 (SC)

Pohla Singh @ Pohla Ram (D) by Lrs. and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-05-2004

Reported in : JT2004(5)SC117; 2004(5)SCALE574; (2004)6SCC126

..... cannot be taken away even by retrospective amendment of the act shall also be gone into. the allottees did not challenge this part of the order by filing any letters patent appeal. however, having regard to the view taken by us and to avoid any scope for further litigation and to do complete justice between the parties, we set aside the ..... filed by the allottees was rightly allowed by the learned single judge.20. against the aforesaid decision of the leaned single judge, gurbachan singh son of dhanna singh preferred letters patent appeal which was allowed by the full bench of the high court and the said decision is subject matter of challenge in the present appeal. as discussed earlier, the view ..... decided on 9.1.1980 and further that they shall not be dispossessed from the land in dispute in compliance with the aforesaid order. gurcharan singh then preferred a letters patent appeal which has been allowed by a full bench of the high court by the judgment and order dated 4.6.1999 and it has been held that he was ..... . 1. this appeal by special leave has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 4.6.1999 of a full bench of high court of punjab & haryana whereby letters patent appeal preferred by respondent no.4 gurcharan singh was allowed, the judgment and order dated 13.8.1992 of the learned single judge allowing the writ petition filed by the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //