Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: allahabad Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 17 results (0.007 seconds)

Jan 14 1958 (HC)

Haji Abdul Shakoor Vs. the Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Kanpur a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-14-1958

Reported in : AIR1959All440

..... it refused relief to a petitioner on the ground of his conduct, even though he was able to prove that the order sought to be quashed was vitiated by a patent lack of jurisdiction. in azizun-nisa v. asstt. custodian, : air1957all561 , a division bench of this court rejected thepetition of azimunnisa and others on the ground that it was mala fide .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1958 (HC)

Ram Roop and ors. Vs. Bishwa Nath and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-1958

Reported in : AIR1958All456

..... . the high court may also be moved to act under it when there has been a flagrant abuse of the elementary principles of justice or a manifest error of law patent on the face of the record or an outrageous miscarriage of justice. but the high court will not be justified in converting itself into a court of appeal and subverting ..... and it was held that the case was of an extraordinary nature and as the subordinate court had signally failed to do its duty and there had not been any patent neglect on the part of the petitioner, it was a fit case in which a direction should be issued to the subordinate court to do its duty and to complete .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1958 (HC)

B. Tulsi Pat Ram and anr. Vs. Nayab Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-1958

Reported in : AIR1958All565

..... rejection of the application under order xli, rule 21 having been dismissed on 1-9-1933 the application for execution was within time the matter was considered in a letters patent appeal by a bench consisting of courtney-terrell, c. j. and james, j. the learned chief justice took the view that there, was no essential difference between orders for restoration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1958 (HC)

Satya Deo Gupta Vs. Amrit Dhara Pharmacy

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-19-1958

Reported in : AIR1958All823

..... . it may be noted here that in this case, we are not concerned with the composition of the medicine produced. that would be a matter under the patent law. if a particular prescription is patented, any other firm may not produce a medi-cine with the same prescription. but here we haveonly to see whether the goods produced by the applicant shri .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1958 (HC)

Mahendra Pal Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-27-1958

Reported in : AIR1959All313; 1959CriLJ541

..... also, but in their case it is provided that review will be permissible if it is authorized by the letters patent or the other instrument constituting the high court.it is not suggested on behalf of the applicants that the letters patent or the other instrument constituting the allahabad high court contain anything authorising this court to review its judgments. it may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1958 (HC)

Assistant Custodian, Evacuee Property, Shahjahanpur Vs. Civil Judge, S ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-25-1958

Reported in : AIR1959All574

..... agreeable. there is some ground for questioning the correctness of the opinion that, the custodian is not a necessary party. but it cannot be said that that opinion discloses a patent error. nor does the observation that the plaintiffs are not agreeable, disclose any such error. so, although the view of the trial court as regards the applicability of section 50 ..... of the act was not sound, the order read as a whole cannot be said to disclose a patent error of law. so no interference is possible under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution. both the connected proceedings must be dismissed.19. civil revision no. 637 of 1956 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 1958 (HC)

Mohan Lal and anr. Vs. GraIn Chamber Ltd., Muzaffarnagar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-07-1958

Reported in : AIR1959All276

..... correctness, in the case of a remand under order 41, rule 23 of the code of civil procedure by a single judge, from which an appeal lay under the letters patent but no appeal was preferred against the correctness of the order of remand, could not thereafter be challenged under section 105(2) of the code of civil procedure, nor could .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 1958 (HC)

Deoki Nandan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-12-1958

Reported in : AIR1959All10

..... result that the only effective judgment of the high court affirmed the decision of the court immediately below. this appears to me to be the true result of the letters patent and thecode, for the code makes no provision for anappeal within the high court, that is to say, from a single judge of the high court. this right ofappeal depends .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1958 (HC)

Vijai Pal and anr. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-23-1958

Reported in : AIR1959All559; 1959CriLJ1040

..... follows :'save as otherwise provided by this code or by any other law for the time being in force or, in the case of a high court by the letters patent or other instrument constituting such. high court, no court, when it has signed its judgment, shall alter or review the same, except to correct a clerical error.'in the first .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 1958 (HC)

Thannoo Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-06-1958

Reported in : AIR1959All131; 1959CriLJ158

..... should therefore have been recalled at the trial. but it struck neither the district govern- ment counsel nor the learned sessions judge to do so. the matter is however quite patent on the very face if it. the injury caused depressed fracture of the skull and laceration of the brain, and death was instantaneous on receipt of it.it follows that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //