Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 16 results (0.047 seconds)

Jan 21 1958 (HC)

Commercial and Industrial Bank Limited Vs. Authority Under Payment of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-21-1958

Reported in : (1958)IILLJ31AP

..... , secondly, because the notification itself made no reference to pending applications. the second contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner must therefore be accepted. if so, there is patent want of jurisdiction on the part of the respondent 1 to deal with the petition presented by respondents 2 to 7 on october 24, 1955. if the above conclusion is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 1958 (HC)

Shankerlal Karva Vs. Tahsildar and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-27-1958

Reported in : [1958]9STC246(AP)

..... not admittedly done.3. under the aforesaid circumstances, i find no warrant in law for the recovery of the amount of rs. 2, 500 from the petitioner. there being a patent want of jurisdiction on the part of the respondents in recovering the tax from the petitioner, a writ of prohibition will issue restraining the respondents from recovering the amount of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1958 (HC)

Potta Sitharamiah Vs. V. Virraju

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-28-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP507

..... of mistake in law; hut where a vakil or a vakil's clerk was unaware of the existence of a specific article-(170) in regard to pauper appeals it amounts patently to ignorance of law. ignorance of law can never be excused while a mere mistake sometimes may claim condonation. 8. the appeal would be in time had it not been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1958 (HC)

Murali Krishna Rice Mill Vs. Additional Income Tax Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-1958

Reported in : [1959]36ITR239(AP)

..... act thus provides a hierarchy of tribunals where the petitioner can agitate his contentions. mr. ranganathachari, however, has submitted that the want of jurisdiction in the income-tax officer being patent, the petitioner should not be driven to seek his remedies before the authorities provided under the act and that this is a fit case for the exercise of jurisdiction under ..... jurisdiction, which according to the learned counsel for the petitioner gives jurisdiction to this court to quash the assessment order itself at this stage, cannot be said to be so patent. having regard to the undoubted and adequate remedies which the petitioner has under the income-tax act and having regard to the further fact that the petitioner has himself taken .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 1958 (HC)

Chunduri Venkata Reddy Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-14-1958

Reported in : [1959]35ITR87(AP)

..... their own expellers, the firm at lahore calling its expellers as 'chisty diamond' and the firm at bezwada 'andhra diamond', and neither of the parties was permitted to imitate the patent of the other. above all, the most important clause was that the lahore merchant was to give four expellers, two 'n. s. sholer type' and two 'standard type', free of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1958 (HC)

Pulipati Subbarao and Co. Vs. Appellate Asstt. Commissioner of Income- ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-19-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP505; [1959]35ITR673(AP)

..... if he were to embark upon a fresh enquiry as to the quantum of the income or the loss incurred by the petitioner. 9. as there is a clear and patent want of jurisdiction on the part of the 2nd respondent to make a de novo assessment on the petitioner, a writ of prohibition shall be issued directing the 2nd respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1958 (HC)

Natha Subrahmanyam Chetty Vs. Menta Subramaiah and Sons and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-08-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP199

..... the remission of an award on the ground of illegality apparent on its face, it must be one of such a nature as to permit of no argument and be patent on its face and if permitted to pass unrectified would do substantial injustice in both law and equity to the parties concerned. the argument of the learned advocate has been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1958 (HC)

Repaka Appalanarasimham and ors. Vs. Repaka Udalama and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP407

..... . there was a difference of opinion between satyanarayana rao j. and panchapagesa sastry j. and the appeal was therefore heard by viswanatha sastry j. under clause 36 of the letters patent. while satyanarayana rao j. held that communication was necessary to all the members of the family, panchapagesa sastry j. took the view that the communication to the manager alone was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1958 (HC)

Sitaram Reddy Vs. Chinna Ram Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-16-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP159

..... one pertaining to (a). if a decree is a nullity, the executing court can refuse to execute it. but the question is, if the inherent defect of jurisdiction is not patent on the face of the decree or is not evident without an elaborate enquiry to establish that the court passing the decree had no jurisdiction, can the executing court go .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1958 (HC)

In Re: Godavarthy Bhashyakaracharyulu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1958

Reported in : AIR1960AP164; 1960CriLJ315

..... , criminal procedure code can save the accused. for the principle of autrefois convict to have any bearing, there must be ft conviction in respect of the same offence. jt would be a patent violation of the principle and a contravention of the terms of section 403 if the accused should ask for relief on that principle. it is a distinct offence altogether that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //