Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 70 results (0.036 seconds)

Jan 04 2002 (HC)

G. Rama Sharma Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by Its Sec ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-04-2002

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT593

..... while exercising power of judicial review under article 226. the high court can interfere with such finding only when such finding is found to be perverse or suffers from a patent error on the face of the record or based on `no evidence' at all. that is not the position obtaining in the instant case. therefore, if the court were to ..... india v. h.c. goel, this court held at p. 728 that if the conclusion, upon consideration of the evidence reached by the disciplinary authority, is perverse or suffers from patent error on the face of the record or based on no evidence at all, a writ of certiorari could be issued8. the supreme court in high court of judicature at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 2002 (HC)

M. Biskshapathi and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Fisheries, Hyderabad and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-04-2002

Reported in : AIR2002AP179

..... members after the amendment of bye-law. but the reasoning given by the second respondent that the admission of members prior to amendment of bye-law cannot be disqualified as patently erroneous in view of sections 19 and 21 of the act. the first respondent rightly interpreted the said sections and after providing the sufficient opportunity to the fourth respondent and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2002 (HC)

Mahendra R. Saraf and ors. Vs. Goldstone Technologies Limited and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-09-2002

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD824; 2002(1)ALT516

..... and arrived at an understanding wherein the respondents agreed inter alia to (i) buy 100% equity shares of the petitioners held in natural technologies private limited along with product rights, patent and trade marks; (ii) meet the running expenses of the banking division (ntpl) and to (iii) share the profit with the petitioners in an agreed manner for a period of ..... agreement was entered into between the petitioners and the respondents on 22-2-2000 under which the petitioners have sold 100% of the equity shares of ntpl with product rights, patent and trade mark to the respondents. the agreed operational terms and conditions were incorporated in the agreement dated 22-2-2000 which were required to be performed and discharged by ..... andhra pradesh which was formed by the andhra state act, 1953, but the court has not exercised original jurisdiction as mentioned in clauses 11 and 12 of the madras letters patent as from time to time with the aforementioned enactments of the civil court act, the legislature has brought deprivation of such jurisdiction.22. a learned single judge of this court ..... in b. prasada rao v. sas mines and minerals limited, : 1999(3)ald358 , has also taken the same view in his considered judgment.23. under clause (11) of the letters patent for the high court of judicature at madras, it is provided that the high court of madras had ordinary original civil jurisdiction which it shall exercise within such local limits .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2002 (HC)

Devu Veerabhadra Rao and ors. Vs. Gollapalli Latchanna (Died) by Lrs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-21-2002

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD230; 2002(3)ALT608

..... .sharma submitted that the petitioner has lost the case in both the courts below and this court in revisional jurisdiction has to see whether there is any material irregularity or patent illegality committed by the courts below which warrants interference by this court. when the respondents could establish that fraud was played by the petitioner both on the respondents and the ..... that the purchased property was subject-matter of declaration under the a.p. land ceiling act, and thus they have no saleable interest in the lands and, therefore, they have patently played fraud both on the court and the petitioner and thus, allowed the petition with costs.7. against that order, civil miscellaneous appeal no. 1 of 1985 was filed and ..... and therefore, it goes to the very root of the sale that he is not having saleable interest. therefore, for all these reasons, i do not see any irregularity or patent illegality to entertain the revision. the civil revision petition accordingly fails and is dismissed. but in the circumstances of the case, without costs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2002 (HC)

D. Surender Reddy and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Represented

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-23-2002

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)351; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)419; 2002CriLJ2611

..... against the accused or the complaint does not disclose the essential ingredients of an offence which is alleged against the accused. (2) where the allegations made in the complaint are patently absurd and inherently improbable so that no prudent person can ever reach a conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused. (3) where the discretion exercised by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2002 (HC)

Thotakura Ravindra Babu and anr. Vs. Thotakura Seshagiri Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-25-2002

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD521

..... the said decision was later considered by the supreme court in the decision (supra) and it was categorically held that no further appeal under letters patent lie from the matter arising out of order 43, rule 1 cpc. therefore, when the earlier decision of the supreme court (supra) is clarified ..... provides that no further appeal lies, the present lpas are not maintainable. in support of his contention that the provisions of clause 15 of letters patent is subject to other legislations, as provided under clause 44, learned counsel placed reliance on a decision of the supreme court in national sewing thread ..... when there is a specific embargo under sub-section (2) of section 104 of cpc, the present lpas are not maintainable even though the letters patent is a special enactment. elaborating his submissions, learned counsel submitted that the ratio laid down by the four judge bench of the supreme court in ..... )1scc49 , submitting that the supreme court in these two decisions has not elaborately discussed the implications arising out of order 43 rule 1 has the letters patent clauses and as such, the earlier four judges decision of the supreme court in union of india's case (supra) shall prevail over these two decisions ..... 302, the embargo as provided under sub-section (2) of section 104 of cpc is not an obstacle for filing an appeal, under the letters patent provisions against the orders passed by the learned single judge in the proceedings under order 43, rule 1 or order 47, rule 1 cpc. learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2002 (HC)

Kosipalli Satyanarayana Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-2002

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)667; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)85; II(2002)DMC749

..... has erred in convicting the appellant exclusively basing on the dying declaration, ex. p-7. he further submitted that a part of the said dying declaration, ex. p-7 is patently false and, therefore, ex. p-7 has got to be carefully scrutinized, for the reason that the dying declaration is recorded in the absence of the accused and such declarant ..... and nothing particular was found. thus, the portion of ex. p-7 recorded by p.w. 7 when she says that she was pregnant by 7 or 8 months is patently incorrect.9. the learned counsel for the appellant contended that when part of the dying declaration is false, it cannot be relied on to base conviction. in support of his ..... view of the admission on the part of p.ws. 1 and 2 that they were tutored to give false evidence against the accused, and also in view of the patently falsity of the declarant-deceased that she was pregnant by 7 or 8 months, and above all when the court below has extended the benefit of doubt to all the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2002 (HC)

K.V. Subrahmanayam and ors. Vs. Joint Collector, Cuddapah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-12-2002

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD357

..... rao and justice p. rama rao) while interpreting the words 'motion shall be put to vote' appearing in sub-section (9) of section 46 of the act, held:it is patent from the provisions of the a.p. municipalities act that the modalities for election of chairman and vice-chairman and no-confidence motion envisage a different and distinct bearing. insofar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2002 (HC)

industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited, New Delhi Vs. Sree Kr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-18-2002

Reported in : 2002(3)ALD781; 2002(3)ALT168

..... and the company was informed that the balance of the principal amounts to be disbursed would be treated as adjusted towards interest and that action of the financial institutions is patently illegal and not in public interest. in the writ affidavit, it is contended by the petitioner-company that if the financial institutions had disbursed the loans sanctioned in the first .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2002 (HC)

Mohd. QutubuddIn Vs. Aziz Khan and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-15-2002

Reported in : 2002AIHC4073

..... that when oncesection 47 was deleted, the possession given earlier would be considered asvalidly given. ultimately, their lordships agreedwith the conclusion arrived at by justice madhava reddy and dismissed theletters patent appeal.84. from the above it is seen that the learned judgesfirstly expressed concurrence with earlier decision of this court in syed jalal(29 supra) and secondly observed that by ..... conclusion, the learned judgerelied on another judgment of a division bench of this court comprising ofjustice gopal rao ekbote and justice a.v.krishna rao, as they then were, inletters patent appeal no. 176 of 1990 dated 9.12.1970 wherein again theirlordships were considering the effect of non obtaining of prior permission fromthe tahsildar before the court auction is confirmed ..... want of sanction. hence,the judgment and decree passed by the learned single judge in c.c.c.a.no. 28 of1991 is confirmed on a different reasoning. the letters patent appeal no.131 of 1999 is dismissed. there will be no order as to costs.104. l.p.a. no. 134 of 1999:105. this letters ..... patent appeal is filed against thejudgment and decree in c.c.c.a.no. 29 of 1991 wherein his lordship justiceramesh madhav bapat dismissed the appeal and the suit holding that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //