Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 93 results (0.039 seconds)

Oct 05 2012 (HC)

Ajay Kumar Gupta Dochania Vs. M/S. Bhagyanagar Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd, a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-05-2012

..... and to the ascertained evils to which the former act had given rise, and to the later act which provided the remedy. (eastman photographic material company v. comptroller general of patents, designs and trade marks (1898 ac 571); in re mayfair property company ((1898) 2 ch.28)bengal immunity co. ltd. (supra); parayankandiyal eravath kanapravan kalliani amma (smt) (supra)). a statute .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2012 (HC)

E.S. Sulochana Vs. P. Yogamba Lakshmi and ors

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-03-2012

..... his claim prior to the actual delivery of possession to the decree-holder in the execution proceedings. the view taken by the high court in this connection also results in patent breach of principles of natural justice as the obstructionist who alleges to have any independent right, title and interest in the decretal property and who is admittedly not a party ..... court, the need for advancing the e.p. suo motu, needs to be explained by the court itself. this court feels that the learned senior civil judge has compounded the patently illegal order passed by her by closing the e.p. after suo motu advancing the same. in the opinion of this court, the learned senior civil judge owes an explanation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2012 (HC)

E.S. Sulochana Vs. P. Yogamba Lakshmi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-03-2012

hon'ble sri justice c.v. nagarjuna reddy c.r.p.no.2787 o 3. 2-2012 e.s. sulochana p. yogamba lakshmi and others counsel for petitioner : sri s. subba reddy counsel for respondent no.1 : sri v. jagapathi counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3 : -- cases referred 1 (1997) 3 scc 69.2. 2010(2) alt 9.(db) 3. air 199.s.c.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2012 (HC)

Ajmeera Raghavulu Vs. Guguloth Rupla (Died) by His L.R., Gugul

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-16-2012

..... defendant in the suit, is not shown to have been heard before passing the said order. the entire procedure followed by the agent to the government at khammam is, thus, patently erroneous and unsustainable. 7. for the above-mentioned reasons, the order under revision is set aside. since the suit is of the year 2008, the agent to the government at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2012 (HC)

Shaik Mohd. Ali Ansari and Others. Vs. Shaik Abdul Samed (Died) Per Lr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-01-2012

judgment: (per sri justice sanjay kumar) 1. this letters patent appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2001 in a.s.no.23 of 1985, whereby a learned judge of this court reversed the judgment and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2012 (HC)

Shaik Mohd. Ali Ansari and Others. Vs. Shaik Abdul Samed (Died) Per Lr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-01-2012

..... mohammedan law, 8th edition 11) air 195.supreme court 358 (para 14) 12) (1991) 191 itr 27.13) air 195.allahabad 42 judgment: (per sri justice sanjay kumar) this letters patent appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2001 in a.s.no.23 of 1985, whereby a learned judge of this court reversed the judgment and ..... the hon'ble the chief justice shri madan b.lokur and the hon'ble shri justice sanjay kumar letters patent appeal no.141 of 200.01-03-2012 shaik mohd. ali ansari & others. shaik abdul samed (died) per lrs. and others. counsel for appellants : sri vedula venkataramana counsel for respondents : .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2012 (HC)

Bmw India Private Limited (A1) and Others Vs. the State of A.P., Rep., ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-2012

..... of the case. where a purchaser has himself seen and examined the subject of his purchase, he will not be entitled afterwards to repudiate the transaction on the ground of patent fault, unless he can prove fraud on the part of the seller; the purchaser, being bound to satisfy himself, in the ordinary case, of the quality of the subject bought .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2012 (HC)

Bmw India Private Limited (A1), Building Vs. the State of A.P., Rep., ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-2012

..... of the case. where a purchaser has himself seen and examined the subject of his purchase, he will not be entitled afterwards to repudiate the transaction on the ground of patent fault, unless he can prove fraud on the part of the seller; the purchaser, being bound to satisfy himself, in the ordinary case, of the quality of the subject bought .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2012 (HC)

M/S. Northgate Technologies Limited

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-28-2012

..... scheme is meant. (miheer h. mafatlal). unless the scheme is shown to be contrary to any law or is such as to shock the conscience of the court or is patently unfair to the members or creditors or any class of them, or is against public interest or against public policy, the court should not come in the way of business .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 2012 (HC)

D. Venkata Krishna Rao and Others Vs. Government of A.P., Rep. by Prin ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-03-2012

..... natural justice (institute of chartered accountants of india v l.k.ratna (1986) 4 scc 537 : air 1987 sc 71); and (iv) when challenge is to the action which is patently erroneous and ex facie without jurisdiction (champalal binani and whirlpool corporation v registrar of trade marks, mumbai air 1999 sc 22 : (1998) 8 scc 1). in addition to these, ifa .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //