Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: chennai Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 34 results (0.026 seconds)

Feb 28 1958 (HC)

Blackwood and Sons Ltd. and ors. Vs. A.N. Parasuraman and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-28-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad410

..... am unable to conceive of the possibility of such a course without attributing a local situation to that right.62. earlier i have set out instances of intangible rights like patents and trade marks as affording an analogy for reaching a decision in relation to copyright. the basis of the rule in those cases is to be found in the two ..... a debt be stipulated it will be there situate, the general rule notwithstanding. a cause of action in contract or tort is situate where action may be brought upon it. patents and trade marks are situate where they can be transferred on the same principle as shares in companies......the inference, however, must not be rawn that because no personal property ..... principle which fixes 'situs' with reference to the jurisdiction where the right could be enforced, and (3) lastly the analogy furnished by comparable intangible rights such as patents and trade marks (as to patents see 1932 ac 23858. if the intangible right whose situs has to be determined is a statutory right and owes its existence to a statute enacted by a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1958 (HC)

S. Ratnasami Mudaliar Vs. Ponnammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-31-1958

Reported in : (1958)1MLJ427

..... the first defendant, a.s. no. 52 of 1954. it is the correctness of that direction that is really challenged in this appeal preferred under clause 15 of the letters patent. 6. as we have said, that the question at issue between the parties has to be disposed of in accordance with section 6-a of act xxv of 1955, can .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 1958 (HC)

P.T. Munia Servai Vs. Hanuman Bank Ltd. by Official Liquidator

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-04-1958

Reported in : AIR1958Mad418; (1958)2MLJ96

..... of appeals. the granting of probates or succession certificates will come within the original civil jurisdiction, but it would not come under ordinary original civil jurisdiction, which, by the letters patent, seems to be confined to suits and matters under clauses 12 to 21, which refer to the exercise by the high court of its ordinary original givil jurisdiction.10. but ..... this court passed the order, dated 21st october, 1953, did not come within the purview of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction defined in clauses 11 and 12 of the letters patent could not admit of any doubt. clause 11 defined the territorial limits of the jurisdiction, suits arising within which would be tried by this court in the exercise of the ..... dealt with. in the application of that principle it is immaterial whether the ordinary original civil jurisdiction, besides that provided for by clause 12 of the letters patent is one conferred by the letters patent itself, or by a separate enactment.9. the learned counsel for the appellant referred to kuppuswami nayagar, in re (1929) 59 m.l.j. 17 ; i.l .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1958 (HC)

In Re: Pinapala Venkateswarlu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-10-1958

Reported in : (1958)1MLJ337

p. rajagopalan, o.c.j.1. we agree with the office that clause 15 of the letters patent does apply. the application to amend the decree in the second appeal certainly invoked the civil appellate jurisdiction vested in this court. if so leave of the learned judge who dismissed the application to amend the decree was necessary under rule 95 of the appellate side rules read with clause 15 of the letters patent. no such leave was asked for or obtained. the appeal is incompetent.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1958 (HC)

Al.Sp.Pl. Thirunavukkarasu Chettiar and ors. Vs. State of Madras by th ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-10-1958

Reported in : (1958)2MLJ596

..... occupancy ryots are found only in estates under the estates land act where the owner has only the melwaram.12. the next new fact relied on was that in letters patent appeal the order in w.p. no. 737 of 1952 regarding one of the villages included in the 199 villages was quashed on the ground that the facts found by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1958 (HC)

K. Sarojini Devi Vs. A. Krishnamoorthy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-13-1958

Reported in : (1958)2MLJ166

p. rajagopalan, o.c.j.1. this appeal filed under clause 15 of the letters patent arose out of proceedings which commenced with the presentation of o.p. no. 254 of 1954 in the city civil court. that petition was presented by krishnamoorthy, the respondent in ..... court refusing the dissolution of the marriage is not the subject-matter of this appeal.9. the appellant will be entitled to her costs from the respondent in the letters patent appeal.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1958 (HC)

Muthuramalinga thevar Vs. the State of Madras Represented by the Chief ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-1958

Reported in : AIR1958Mad425; 1958CriLJ1047; (1958)IIMLJ169

..... , had in view. when the grounds justified the detention of the petitioner, it cannot be said that it was a case of satisfaction on the part of the detaining authority, 'patently simulated' see ashutosh lahiri v. state of delhi : air1953sc451 .9. the learned advocate general drew our attention to the instructive passages in the judgments of lord reid and lord radcliffe .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 1958 (HC)

M.S. Nagaraja Dikshitar Alias M.S. Nagaraja Sarma Vs. Sundaresa Sastri ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-03-1958

Reported in : (1958)2MLJ557

..... was mentioned before me by mr. jagadisan, who appeared for the appellant in a.s. no. 164 of 1956, that that appeal is now the subject-matter of a letters patent appeal. the bench ruling in rajagopal naidu v. sivakami amtnal : (1956)1mlj589 , directly applies to this case and holds that a sub-mortgagee in respect of one or more items .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1958 (HC)

Thiruvengada Mudaliar Vs. T. Narayana Reddiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad141

..... points and held that the suit was maintainable and remanded the suit to the trial court for disposal on merits. he, however, granted leave to appeal and hence this letters patent appeal by the second defend ant, auction-purchaser in the sale in execution of the decree in o.. s. no. 67 of 1934. learned counsel for the appellant once again ..... concerned property did not pass out of the estate of the insolvent before adjudication. 4. as both the grounds urged by the learned counsel for the appellant fail the letters patent appeal must be and is hereby dismissed with costs of the plaintiff-respondent.

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1958 (HC)

N. Santhanam Iyer Alias Santhanarama Iyer Vs. Somasundara Vanniar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-1958

Reported in : (1958)1MLJ400

..... for consideration was as to whether an order refusing to raise an additional issue would be a judgment within the meaning of that expression in clause 15 of the letters patent act. a full bench of this court held that no appeal lay, meaning thereby that it was not a judgment.5. the expression used in this act is not 'judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //