Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: chennai Year: 1958 Page 2 of about 34 results (0.032 seconds)

Mar 07 1958 (HC)

Ramayya Padayachi Vs. Ambal Bagyam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-07-1958

Reported in : (1958)2MLJ593

p.v. rajamannar, c.j.1. we agree with the learned judge that even assuming that all the evidence adduced on behalf of the appellant were true, there is only proof of adulterous conduct on the part of the wife but there is no evidence which can support the finding that she is the concubine of any other man. learned counsel for the appellant contended that if a wife lived continuously in adultery with another man, then she would be his concubine. this would not be so unless she has left her husband's house and has been living with her paramour practically as with a husband. the, distinction is brought out very clearly, if we may say so with respect, in a recent decision of the andhra high court, in subbaramiah v. venkata subbamma (1956) an. w.r. 428. we are of opiriion that the evidence in this case is not sufficient to enable the court to give a rinding that the wife is a concubine of another man. as divorce was sought only on this ground the petition was rightly dismissed by basheer ahmed sayeed, j. the letters patent appeal is dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1958 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi), Owing the Southern Rly. by Its General Manager V ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad117; (1958)IIMLJ419

..... judges who held that an order of transfer of a suit from a subordinate court to this court was a judgment within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent. there are also other decisions which proceed on similar reasoning to which reference need not be made.the supreme court, however, in asrumati debi v. rupendra deb, ..... alagappa chettiar, ilr mad 1, and in subsequent decisions to find out whether an order falls within the category of a judgment under clause 15 of the letters krishna reddi v. thanikachala mudalia, ilr (1924) mad 136: air 1924 mad 90, more or less the same kind of reasoning was adopted by the learned ..... court sitting on the original side, allowing or refusing to allow a plaintiff to sue as a pauper is a judgment under clause 15 of the letters patent and is appealable.the reasoning of the learned judges was that such an order was not an interlocutory one made in the exercise of a discretionary power. ..... must be dismissed on the short ground that it is not maintainable. the order under appeal is not a judgment, within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent to permit this appeal. learned counsel for the appellant relied upon the ruling in baba sah v. purushotama sah, ilr (1925) mad 700 : air 1925 mad 167 ..... order inquestion docs not fulfil either of the tests, we musthold that it is not a judgment within the meaningof clause 15 of the letters patent. it follows that thisappeal under that clause is not sustainable and istherefore dismissed with costs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1958 (HC)

Ramanuja Naicker and ors. Vs. Seethalakshmi Ammal Alias Sellathayee an ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-18-1958

Reported in : (1958)2MLJ512

..... necessary to file a suit to enforce the charge declared by the decree he allowed the appeal before him and set aside the order of the court below. the letters patent appeal before us is against the order of ramaswami, j.4. mr. annaswami ayyar, learned counsel for the appellants, contended that the decree as it now stands is not executable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 1958 (HC)

Chinnamuthu Ambalam Vs. S. Jagannatha Chariar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-26-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad89; 1959CriLJ328; (1959)1MLJ135

..... was this minority family of alagaiyanaikapuram the defendant in the suit.the eldest of them the 1st defendant was bombarding the authorities police magistracy, state government etc. to book these patent and potential mischief mongers. these agitators were known to intend to put on a special display to mar the republic day celebrations. on the reports of responsible police officer, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 1958 (HC)

B.V. Sundararaja Iyer and ors. Vs. Kanakaraj

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-28-1958

Reported in : (1958)2MLJ374

..... with the admitted case of the respondent that he would be entitled to rs. 5,500-13-9. the appellants have filed this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent against the judgment of mack, j.3. to appreciate the respondent's contention which was accepted by the learned judge, it is necessary to set out the relevant portions of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1958 (HC)

National Traders, a Firm of Merchants in Partnership Vs. Hindustan Soa ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad112; (1960)IIMLJ195

ramachandra iyer, j. 1. this appeal arises under clause 35 of the letters patent from the judgment of basheer ahmed sayeed j. in c. c. c. a. no. 93 of 1952, at the instance of the plaintiff. that appeal arose out of a suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1958 (HC)

Abdul Kafoor and anr. Vs. Abdul Razack and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-18-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad131; (1958)2MLJ492

..... estoppel. in this connection reference may be made to the decision in ilr (1918) mad 365 : air 1918 mad 119. that was an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent against the judgment of sadasiva aiyar, j., who differed from spencer, j. that decision is reported in asa beevi v. karuppan chetty, 41 ind cas 361 : air 1918 mad 743 ..... ramachandra iyer, j.1. this appeal is under clause 15 of the letters patent against the judgment of krishnaswami nayudu, j. in s. a. no. 1407 of 1946. that arose out of a suit filed by the appellants against the respondents for partition and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1958 (HC)

Mohammed Ismail Maracair and ors. Vs. Doraisami Mudaliar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-23-1958

Reported in : (1959)2MLJ74

..... the mortgage was fatal to the whole suit and, in that view, he dismissed the suit. the plaintiffs have, therefore, filed the above appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent. mr. k. s. desikan appearing for the appellants contended that the appellants could maintain the suit to recover their share of the mortgage amount and that the impleading of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 1958 (HC)

N. Devasahayam Vs. the State of Madras, Represented by the Secretary, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-02-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad1; (1957)2MLJ38

..... the nature of punishment. the words of the article are 'dismissed or removed or reduced in rank.' the penal character of the action described by the first two words is patent and the last words 'reduced in rank' also contemplate only such reduction as amounts to a penalty.these words are obviously linked with the third category of the penalties- set .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 1958 (HC)

Mahalinga Pathar Vs. Santhanagopalakrishnan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad80; (1958)2MLJ580

..... the ground to set out in his written statement in the original suit, though his contention that his pleas had been impliedly upheld must fail. in this view the letters patent appeals must be dismissed, but there will be no order as to costs.4. the two applications filed by the son were heard and disposed of by the learned subordinate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //