Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: chennai Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 29 results (0.026 seconds)

Jan 16 1964 (HC)

The Daily Calendar Supplying Bureau, Sivakasi Vs. the United Concern

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-16-1964

Reported in : AIR1967Mad381

..... a district court, a cross-reference had been made to the civil procedure code in the same manner as is found in the guardian and wards act or in the indian patents and designs act. however, we find in section 62(2) of the act, xiv of 1957, a cross-reference to the code of civil procedure, which ..... jurisdiction (hereinafter called a district court) and include the local limits of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of a high court."clauses 11 and 12 of the letters patent confers ordinary original civil jurisdiction to the high court, over the presidency town of madras, therefore, the area of the presidency town will be a district as ..... district court. the civil procedure code, to which reference is made in the definition clause in some of the other enactments like the guardians and wards act and the indian patents and designs act already referred to, in section 2(4) gives the definition of 'district' as meaning."the local limits of the jurisdiction of a principal civil ..... was significance in the deletion of the words high court in act xiv of 1957. he also referred to certain other enactments like the indian patents and designs act (act 11 of 1911) and guardian and wards act (act viii of 1890). in section 2(6) of the indian ..... patents and designs act, district court has been defined as having the meaning assigned to that expression by the code of civil procedure, 1908 section 4( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 1964 (HC)

V. Manioka thevar Vs. Star Plough Works, Melur

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-01-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Mad327; (1965)1MLJ406

..... of whether or not the invention involves any new inventive skill having regard to what was known or used prior to the date of the patent, courts will not grant an interim injunction restraining the defendant from pursuing his normal business activity. an interim injunction will not be granted if ..... in large number of star master ploughs 99.(5) principles regulating the grant of an interim injunction in a suit complaining of infringement of a patent are fairly well settled. the plaintiff must make out a strong prima facie case for the issue of a temporary injunction. an interim injunction will ..... he has been experimenting and inventing new patterns of ploughs as a result of his inventive genius and prolonged research and that he obtained a patent on 12-10-1960 in respect of a particular pattern of plough, having a special twist distinguishing his pattern from the other ploughs in the ..... respondent's conduct was an infringement of the plaintiff's patent. the plaintiff obtained an interim injunction in 1. a. 181 of 1964, but, on an application filed by the defendant-respondent in i. a ..... the appellant filed the suit, o. 8 no. 3 of 1964 on the file of the district judge, madurai, under s. 29 of the patents and designs act, against the respondent for a permanent injunction restraining the respondent form manufacturing and selling certain patterns of ploughs on he ground that he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1964 (HC)

Manicka Gounder Vs. Arunachala Gounder and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-24-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Mad1

..... , however, of the conflict of decisions in this court, the learned judge, if we may say so with respect, very properly granted a certificate under cl. 15 of the letters patent to enable the aggrieved party to file this appeal.(4) it was settled law before the act that a woman married to a member of a joint family became a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 1964 (HC)

Deivasenathipathi Pillai Vs. Visalakshi Achi and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-01-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Mad346; (1965)1MLJ131

(1) this appeal from the judgment of anantnarayanan j. relates to a claim to the estate left by one balakrishna pillai, a successful lawyer who was practising at ariyalur in tiruchirapalli dt. he died on 6-4-1893, leaving behind him his two windows, meenakshi achi and sornathachi. by the latter, he had a daughter visalakshi achi who was a child aged 3 years at the time of his death. visalakshi came of age and was married but no issue resulted from that marriage. meenakshi, of the windows, died about the year 1917. visalakshi, the first respondent became insane and in o. p. 69 of 1944, on the file of the district court, tiruchirapalli, the second respondent to this appeal was appointed as her guardian. the appellant claims that he had been adopted by swarnathachi on 14-9-42, in pursuance of an authority given to her by her husband. the adoption is evidenced by a document, ex a. l, which bears the same date as the adoption. within a period of four months thereform, on 29-12-1942, swarnathachi executed a deed, ex. b. 1, cancelling the adoption. an adoption once lawfully made effects a change of status and it will not thereafter be open to adoptive parent to cancel it. but the deed of cancellation, ex b. 1, is valuable in the instant case, to show the circumstances under which the adoption was made and is also a pointer to the subsequent conduct of the parties. while the adoption deed states that balakrishna pillai had given each one of his two windows permission to adopt a son .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1964 (HC)

Devi Press Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Madras and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-09-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Mad462; (1965)ILLJ294Mad

..... of that company. but that the dissolution took place a week or ten days before the issue of the notification making the act applicable to the printing industry is a patent fact. while in terms the business was not sold as a going concern to the petitioner firm, in effect that was what was done. the entirety of the machinery, it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1964 (HC)

Duraiswamy Reddiar and ors. Vs. Chidambara Reddiar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-24-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Mad348

(1) the point that falls to be decided in this appeal filed against the judgement of venkataraman, j, lies in a narrow compass. the appellant who was the defendant in the trial court is the owner of s. f. nos. 132/2, 132/3 and 132/5 in the village of elandalaipatti. just to the south of s. f. no. 132/5 there is government waster land, s. f. no. 132/6 in which there is a well measuring about 8 cents. adjacent to the well on the southern side is the respondent's nanja lands s. f. no. 216/1. there is unimpeachable evidence in the case to show that the respondent had been taking water from this well to irrigate his lands and that there are in existence permanent structures installed by him, on the well for the purpose. documentary evidence in the case also shows that the predecessors in title of the respondents had form the year 1907 been dealing with the well as their own property. while so, in august 1953, the appellants tried to take water from this well to their lands lying on the north. the respondent obstructed and immediately followed up such obstruction, with suit which has given rise to this appeal wherein he prayed for a declaration of his title to the well and for an injunction restraining the appellants from using the well.(2) the learned district munsif on a careful consideration of the evidence in the case held that neither of the parties has any title to the well in question. but he had no hesitation to accept the respondent's case that he had been in possession .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 1964 (HC)

Vanagiri Sri Selliamman Ayyanar Uthirasomasundareswarar Temple and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Mad355

..... long as they rendered service to the villagers. this view has been accepted on second appeal by venkataraman j. but the learned judge gave a certificate under cl. 15 letters patent for a further appeal. hence this appeal.(2) sri t.s. kuppuswami iyer, appearing for the appellants, first contended that as the lands were given to the ancestors of respondents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1964 (HC)

M. Chettiappan and Another Vs. Income-tax Officer, Karaikudi, and Anot ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-27-1964

Reported in : [1964]54ITR293(Mad)

..... is no foundation for the view that civil and criminal jurisdiction exhaust the list of jurisdiction that are conferred upon the high court by the constitution and under the letters patent. there can be a proceeding which is neither civil not criminal and whether a particular writ application is in the nature of a civil proceeding or criminal proceeding or other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1964 (HC)

J. Mohammad Hanifa Vs. Tahsildar, Thiruthuraipoondi, Tanjore Dt. and o ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Mad78; (1963)2MLJ300

1. the short question that arises for consideration in this appeal against the judgment of srinivasan j. is whether the meeting held for the purpose for passing a "no confidence" motion against the president of kodinkadr panchayat at a place different form the office of the panchayat would by reason of that circumstance alone, be invalid. the appellant was the president of the said panchayat. certain of its members tabled a motion expressing want of confidence in notice under s. 152 of the panchayats act fixed the village temple as the venue of the meeting for the purpose. it is not disputed that the panchayat has got its own office. the meeting of the members of the panchayat was, however, not held there but at the temple. at the meeting eight out of nine members of the panchayat were present and the appellant the president of the panchayat, was also one among the present. the meeting duly passed the resolution expressing want of confidence in the president. the latter applied to this court under art. 226 of the constitution to quash the resolution and the notification removing him from the office of the president, on the ground that the meeting at which the resolution was passed was illegal inasmuch as it was held at a place different form the office of the panchayat.(2) section 152(4) of the act which deals with the place of meeting states that"the tahsildar shall after the expiry of the period of notice issued under sub-section (3) convene a meeting for ht e consideration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1964 (HC)

The Associated Cement Companies Ltd. Vs. L.S. Ramakrishna Gowder

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-31-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Mad318

s. ramachandra iyer, c.j. (1) the appellant secured from the government a considerable extent of vacant land measuring about 420 acres in madukkarai village in coimbatore district under a lease for mining purposes. in that area there were several survey numbers, of which we are concerned for the present only with s. no. 950/1 measuring an extent of 60 acres. just south of it, is s. no. 961/5. in the first instance the term of the lease was 30 years from the year 1934 but this period has not been extended by a further period of 20 years. the respondent purchased one acre from out of s. no. 961/5 from its owner sometime during the year 1950. the respondent had to store chinese crackers in which he had business and for that purpose he built on the land in the year 1950 a magazine, watchman's quarters, etc. the work was commenced that year and was completed in the following year, the respondent having spent nearly rs. 17000. it is stated that the building put up would not be worth twice the amount spent. it is found that by putting up the buildings he had occupied an extent of 79 cents of land in s. no. 950/1 which is government's property and in respect of which a mining lease in favour of the appellant subsists. the respondent did not perhaps know at that time that he was trespassing upon government property. there was every reason for it.the land covered by s. no. 950/1 was fenced and there were boundary stones planted. both the fence and the boundary stones were outside the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //