Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: chennai Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 39 results (0.026 seconds)

Feb 23 1990 (HC)

Madras Industrial Linings Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-1990

Reported in : (1990)37TTJ(Mad)59

..... products that are made in the territory in accordance with the said technical information and to export the same to all countries except in those countries outside the territory where patents exist preventing such use or sale. article 2.02 enables the appellant to sub-license the technical knowhow to other indian companies on terms to be specified by the eec ..... become a part of the technical information given under the licence and belonged to the eec. he next referred to article 8 which showed that there was no guarantee against patent infringement from the side of eec in favour of the assessee. he also pointed out that under article 9 the assessee had to pay for any component parts which it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1990 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Madras Vs. A. Babu and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-09-1990

Reported in : II(1990)ACC313; 1990ACJ1003; AIR1990Mad305

..... and awarded compensation of rs. 26,500/- with proportionate costs against the appellant herein. the appellant has challenged the said award passed by the learned single judge in this letters patent appeal. 2. the learned counsel for the appellant, mr. a. r. ramanathan submitted that the learned single judge of this court erred in awarding compensation against the appellant when the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1990 (HC)

S. Natarajan Vs. Shelly

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-10-1990

Reported in : II(1991)DMC217

..... recording the entire evidence, the trial court arrives at a conclusion that it had no jurisdiction, the petitioner would still be exonerated, for on facts, want of jurisdiction is not patent at this stage.14. the next important question to be adverted to, will be whether the respondent is a person aggrieved as contemplated under section 198 cr.p.c. section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1990 (HC)

P. Kanthammal Vs. D.S. Rajalakshmi and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-18-1990

Reported in : (1990)2MLJ364

..... second schedule generally relating, to payment of court fees in appeals against order and article 3(a)(2) of the second schedule providing for payment of court fee in letters patent appeals against orders, will have no application., thus, the payment of court fee in the appeal against the judgment and decree in c.s.no.82 of 1977 under article ..... orders to the high court and article 3(a)(2)(c) of me second schedule provides for a particular category of appeals against orders under clause 15 letters patent with reference to the payment of court fee in appeals arising out of proceedings on the original side of this court, particularly against a judgment and decree in a suit ..... act 19ss (hereinafter referred to as the court fees act for short) provides for the payment of court fee on memorandum of appeal arising under clause 15 of the letters patent, in any other case, at rs.100. article 3(a) to the second schedule of the court fees act generally makes provision for payment of court fee in appeals against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1990 (HC)

Palania Pillai and Another Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-19-1990

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1563

..... .w. 2. the way in which the first four letter 'muru' have been written in d-3 to d-5 portrays a mechanical immitation. even the first letter 's' is patently at variance, so also the penultimate letter 'a', and the letter 'g'. it is, of course, true that the expert has been cross-examined on, the several movements, pen lifts ..... entry at 3-50 p.m., which fits in with the earlier entry made at 3-45 p.m. noted as item 31. the interlineation in this document is so patent, that with an ulterior motive of setting up a defence, this document had been tampered with and so suit ex. d-2, obviously d-1 also had been brought into ..... . he has frankly admitted that he was deposing about this fact for the first time in court on 25-9-1985, more than a year after the occurrence. it is patent from the evidence of p.w. 7 that d.w. 3 was examined during investigation and the investigation disclosed that d.w. 3 was not present in the hall when .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1990 (HC)

indira and Others Vs. Dr. Vasantha and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-19-1990

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1798

..... of error, omission or irregularity.' the view of the privy council in both aforementioned cases would be sufficient to steer clear of a 'curable irregularity', since not only illegality is patent, but also prejudice to the petitioners is apparent. 13. the impugned order of the sub-divisional magistrate does not disclose the documents placed before him by either party or his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1990 (HC)

S. Rangaranj Vs. Dr. P.R. Subbayyaan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-22-1990

Reported in : (1990)2MLJ95

..... and any such amendment may include an amendment for conversion of petition or proceeding for judicial separation into a petition or proceeding, as the case may be, for divorce.the patent implication of section 39 of act 68 of 1976 is that all the petitions and proceedings in causes and matters matrimonial, which are pending in any court at the commencement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1990 (HC)

S. Rangaraj Vs. R.R. Subbayan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-22-1990

Reported in : II(1990)DMC277

..... any such amendment may include an amendment for conversion of a petition or proceeding for judicial separation into a petition or proceeding, as the case may be, for divorce.' the patent implication of section 39 of act 68 of 1976 is that all the petitions and proceedings in causes and matters matrimonial, which are pending in any court at the commencement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1990 (HC)

The Idol of Sri Kannika Parameswari Amman and Others Vs. the Education ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-08-1990

Reported in : AIR1990Mad337

..... also is answered in favour of the appellant. in view of the findings on these two points, referred above, the appeal is to be allowed.in the result, the letters patent appeal is allowed and the judgment and decree passed in a.s. 632 of 1979 are set aside and instead the decree and judgment passed in o.s. 603 of ..... that is applied, the suit is liable to be dismissed.from the rival contentions made on behalf of both the parties, the points that arise for consideration in the letters patent appeal are :1. whether the appellant-plaintiff is entitled to file the suit as a public trust ? 2. what is the effect of the g.o. ms. no. 2000, home ..... the same, defendants 1 to 3 preferred a.s. no. 632 of 1979 before this court. as already stated, the said appeal was allowed. aggrieved by the same, this letters patent appeal is preferred by the plaintiffs.learned counsel appearing for the appellants, mr. m. raghavan, mainly submitted that in the instant case, in view of the findings rendered by the ..... orderk. m. natarajan, j. 1. this letters patent appeal is directed by the appellant-plaintiffs against the judgment and decree passed by the learned single judge of this court in a. s. no. 632 of 1979 allowing the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1990 (HC)

Kothari and Sons and Others Vs. N. Subramanian, Income-tax Officer, Ce ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-1990

Reported in : [1992]196ITR82(Mad)

..... ] 168 itr 591, while considering the several sections under chapter xixa of the act observed that, in the light of section 245f of the income-tax act, 1961, it was patent that the settlement commission, during the pendency of proceedings before it, enjoyed all the powers which were vested in an income-tax authority before the act. sub-section (2) made .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //