Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: chennai Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 74 results (0.026 seconds)

Mar 18 2002 (HC)

Officine Lovato S.P.A. Vs. Raajan Automobiles (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-18-2002

Reported in : 2003(27)PTC343(Mad)

..... in india as well as in various other countries. the plaintiff came to know that the first defendant has been manufacturing and selling autogas conversion kit verbatim copying the registered patent and designs of the plaintiff with the offending trade mark raajan auto gas in chennai through their branch offices at vellore and coimbatore. it is a reproduction of the plaintiff ..... is an italy based company carrying on exclusive business throughout the world pertaining to auto gas conversion kit manufactured by them with a novel design and the same has been patented in various countries. since 1979, the plaintiff has been using the manufacturing the said auto gas conversion kit under the trade mark 'lovato' and 'lovato autogas' from italy and ..... permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their servants or agents or anyone claiming through them from in any manner passing off the plaintiffs auto gas conversion kit bearing the offending design, patent either by using the trade mark 'lovato autogas' or the trade mark raajan auto gas or any other mark or marks as and for the well established auto gas conversion ..... 'lovato autogas' or the trade mark raajan auto gas or any other mark or marks which are in any way identical with or colourable imitation of the plaintiff's registered patent, bearing the trade mark 'lovato' and 'lovato autogas', either by manufacturing, selling or offering for sale or in any manner advertising the same ; (b) granting permanent injunction restraining the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2002 (HC)

Usv Limited Vs. Ipca Laboratories Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-26-2002

Reported in : 2003(26)PTC21(Mad)

..... for the reputation of the make only the applicant is concerned with. in of the decisions reported in horlick's malted milk company v. sumerskill, 1916 the illustrated official journal (patents) supplement 1 and corn products refining co. v. shangrila food products ltd., , it was held that the reputation will attach only to trade mark of the goods purchased by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2002 (HC)

N. Rangaswamy Vs. Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2002

Reported in : 2003(26)PTC408(Mad)

..... the branch office of the respondent is situate within the jurisdiction of this court and as such, seeking leave under clause 12 of the letters patent is absolutely unnecessary. it is open to the respondent to establish by evidence during the course bf the trial about the non-existence of ..... which is outside the jurisdiction of the court and under the circumstance, the applicant ought to have taken leave under clause 12 of the letters patent. para 16 of the plaint relates to cause of action, wherein it is stated that the respondent continues to indulge in violations and making hectic ..... vandalism in petroleum tankers and also at the best price. the plaintiff cannot claim monopoly rights especially as the plaintiff does not have any registered patent in the alleged system. only in the reply affidavit, the plaintiff has for the first time claimed passing off. there is no whisper of ..... times commercial production of the articles by industrial process based on the drawings are made. abloy security limited are the proprietors of number of patents registered in us patent office as mentioned in para 'y'. the sealing of the tankers carrying petroleum products have been made mandatory by petroleum rules, 1976. the ..... based on the said system. the plaintiff having come to existence only in the year 1998, cannot claim any monopoly over the said patent. the life of the patent has long since expired and the technique involved has fallen into public domain and the system can now be used by any person. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2002 (HC)

V. Udayakumar, Vs. I. Navaneethammal,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-22-2002

Reported in : (2002)1MLJ519

..... . hence, we do not find anyillegality in the findings of the trial judge as well as the learnedsingle judge in granting the decree for specific performance. 19. hence, the letters patent appeal is dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2002 (HC)

K. Selvam Vs. Visalam Chit Fund Ltd.,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-01-2002

Reported in : II(2003)BC401; (2002)1MLJ561

..... ofthe transfer of pro perty act.' relying on this decision a learnedsingle judge of this court in easwaran vs . - t.k. venkatachalam and others has held that there was no patent error of law or perversity in the approach of the lower court in orderi ngrestitution of possession of property purchased by the money decreeauction purchaser, since the purchase of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2002 (HC)

Alphonse Vs. S. Dharmaraj

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-06-2002

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ185

..... .4.1988. (d) the inconsistent stand of the respondent in reference to themotive for the alleged execution of the three documents and the failure of thelearned judge to consider the patent illegality in those documents has occasioned failure of justice.9. learned senior counsel mr. g. masilamani arguing on behalf ofthe respondent made the following submissions :(a) the properties were purchased .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2002 (HC)

Thanjavur District Employees Co-op. Credit Societies, Employees Union, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-13-2002

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ162

..... -i, dated 29-5-2000 directing the societies to enter a fresh settlement on the basis of the recommendations made in the above g.o. and the union found several patent and apparent discrepancies and sent representations to consider the modifications to certain recommendations. they are:-2.03:- in the event of a society achieving the norms prescribed to a higher .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2002 (HC)

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Home Dep ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-26-2002

Reported in : (2002)IIILLJ66Mad; (2002)2MLJ282

..... the two ladies were admittedly at the police station at night, no fault can be found with the charges, as framed in the departmental enquiry. the tribunal further fell into patent error in holding that it was a case of 'no evidence'. it is a settled proposition of law that strict rules of evidence are not applicable to departmental enquiries. before ..... was pleased to state the law as under in para 4:'4. we have heard learned counsel for the parties. we are of the view that the tribunal fell into patent error. the criminal charge and the charge in the departmental enquiry were entirely different. the appellate court in the criminal case came to the conclusion that since the two ladies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2002 (HC)

A.V. Arockiam and Etc. Vs. Arul Mary Alias Latchumi Devi and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-05-2002

Reported in : AIR2002Mad435; (2002)2MLJ506

..... the district court having jurisdiction over that place would be alone competent to entertain a petition under the indian divorce act. proviso to clause 35 of the amended letters patent cannot also be ignored. if the parties resided within the jurisdiction of the high court, the high court as also the family court would have jurisdiction to entertain the ..... as principal civil court of ordinary original jurisdiction. in so far as matrimonial jurisdiction is a special jurisdiction exercised by the high court under clause 35 of the letters patent, it cannot be said that the high court is functioning as principal civil court of ordinary original jurisdiction. moreover under the provisions of indian divorce act, the high ..... for 'admiralty jurisdiction'. clause 34 relates to testamentary and intestate jurisdiction'. clause 35 falls under the heading 'matrimonial jurisdiction'. hence the jurisdiction exercised under clause 35 of the letters patent is not one which the high court exercises under its ordinary original jurisdiction. if at all, the high court can be said to be covered by the expression 'district ..... 1984), the jurisdiction of the high court in respect of applications for appointment as guardian by foreign nationals as petitioners of indian minor children under special enactment like the letters patent, madras, was taken away from the high court and entrusted to the family court. the further question also, as to the maintainability of applications for divorce by christian .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2002 (HC)

N.A. Abdul Rahim and Razia Begam Vs. A.M.K. Mariam Bibi,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-2002

Reported in : (2002)1MLJ836

..... pendency of the suit; and also held that the plaintiffs are entitled for mesne profits, the quantum of which will be decided in the execution proceedings. hence the above letters patent appeal has been preferred by the defendants.10.1. mr.k.sarvabhauman, learned senior counsel for the defendants, contends that the oral gift is permissible under the mohammedan law. since .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //