Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: gujarat Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 17 results (0.004 seconds)

Jan 10 1972 (HC)

Shivprasad Umashanker Vs. Municipality of Palitana

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-10-1972

Reported in : (1997)2GLR1460

p.n. bhagwati, c.j.1. this letters patent appeal raises an interesting question affecting the relationship of a municipality and its chief officer under the provisions of the gujarat municipalities act, 1963. the facts giving rise to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 1972 (HC)

Bhagwandev Gopaldas Sharma Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-07-1972

Reported in : AIR1974Guj76

..... the act requires that the elected persons must constitute a gram panchayat. the process of election and that of appointment are quite different and distinct and this is evident and 'patent from the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 53 of the act itself. it is only when a member is not so elected that the competent authority has to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1972 (HC)

Shantilal Babubhai and ors. Vs. Bai Chhani and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-10-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Guj146; (1973)0GLR45

..... requested me. as the chief justice, to refer the point of difference to a full bench. that could be legitimately done because clause 36 of the letter patent provides that 'the case shall then be head upon that point by one or more of the other judges' and the point by of difference can. therefore, ..... point as to whether laxmi had power of disposition inter viovs. now it is true that under clause 36 of the letters patent a point which has not been urged before the division bench and on which the judges composing the division bench have not differed cannot be urged ..... . h. sheth jj. was whether laxmi had an absolute interest or a limited interest and the jurisdiction of divan j. under clause 36 of the letters patent was, therefore, confined only to deciding which of the two views on the point of difference was correct and he had no jurisdiction to entertain a new ..... of the will and effectuate the manifest intention of zaverbhai. but taking this intermediate view rendered the decision of the appeal under clause 36 of the letter patent impossible, since on this intermediate view there would be no majority opinion amongst the judges in according with which the appeal could be decided. divan j. ..... case was then heard on this point by mr. justice divan who was assigned this work by me as chief justice under clause 36 of the letters patent, divan j. found himself unable to agree with the view taken by either of the two learned judges. he preferred to taken an intermediate view, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 1972 (HC)

Mahauva Municipality, Mahuva Vs. Mehta Kiritkumar Umedchand and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-22-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Guj97

..... no jurisdiction, under the relevant rule, to bring him on the record even as a 'proper party'. that was a suit to restrain the alleged infringement of the plaintiff's patent by the defendant, marsden. the court held, reversing the order of the trial judge, that the party sought to be added had no direct interest in the subject-matter of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 1972 (HC)

Vohra Habsu Vs. Shah Chhaganlal Devachand and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-24-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Guj203

..... this tenant and not by actual delivery of possession. this appeal is accordingly allowed with costs.5. mr. christie at the end made a request that a certificate for letters patent appeal may be given. ordinarily as the question has already been settled by their lordships i would have been less inclined to grant a certificate. however, mr. christie pointed out ..... in 12 guj lr 980 = (air 1972 guj 37), our brother dave, j., has granted a certificate and, therefore, i would grant a certificate under clause 15 of the letters patent.6. appeal allowed.

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 1972 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Thakorbhai Vallabhbhai Naik and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-14-1972

Reported in : (1972)0GLR708

..... state government to treat the petitioners on par with degree-holders in the matter of pay scale. this view taken by the learned judge is assailed in the present letters patent appeal. 2. the question is whether fixation of different pay scales for assistant lecturers who are degree-holders and assistant lecturers who are diploma-holders is discriminatory and hence violative ..... bhagwati, c.j. 1. this letters patent appeal raises a short question as to the constitutional validity of prescription of different scales of pay for assistant lecturers who are holders of second class degree with or without .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1972 (HC)

Junagadh Salt and Allied Chemical Works Vs. the State of Gujarat and o ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-04-1972

Reported in : AIR1973Guj68

..... justice divan in the earlier petition is an order of the concerned. it has become final and convulsive consequent upon the withdrawn of the letters patent appeal . the question, therefore, which arises for out consideration is this: can we revise that order in an independent proceeding instituted of obtaining the ..... recorded.5. mr. zaveri was contended that the final order of summary rejection record in the earlier petition and the withdrawal of the letter patent appeal filed against that order operate as re judicata and the present petition. the order made by mr. justice divan is really not speaking ..... order had been recorded by mr. justice divan in the special civil application though the had done it in their absence . since the letter patent appeal was allowed to be withdraw at the admission stage, to the notice was issued to the respondents and therefore the earlier petition could not ..... by mr. justice divan in the earlier special civil application untouched and undisturbed. it became final and conclusive. the order recorded in the letter patent appeal also stated that the appeal was allowed to be withdrawn because the petition wanted to file a fresh petition. the filing of a fresh ..... could the proceeding in the special civil application. it would have been respondent only either upon the review application or upon a appeal . letter patent appeal no. 29 of 1970 was filed by the petitioner against the aforesaid order petition recorded in the earlier writ petition. the following is the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1972 (HC)

Valley Noor Mohomad and anr. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-18-1972

Reported in : AIR1974Guj31; (1973)GLR10

..... 'a tax is compensatory or not is to enquire whether the trades people are having the use of certain facilities for the better conduct of their business and paying not patently much more than what is required for providing the facilities. it would be impossible to judge the compensatory nature of a tax by a meticulous test, and in the nature .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1972 (HC)

Kadarbhai Mahomedbhai and anr. Vs. Haribhai Ranchhodbhai Desai and anr ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-24-1972

Reported in : AIR1974Guj120; (1973)GLR245

..... no order as to costs. at this stage, mr. vakil, learned advocate for the respondent-plaintiff made an oral request for a certificate to file an appeal under the letters patent. in my opinion, the mint involved is not so important as to grant a certificate for filing an appeal under the letters .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1972 (HC)

Amratlal Gurdial JaIn and anr. Vs. the State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-08-1972

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1278; (1973)GLR61

..... high court in the exercise of its original criminal jurisdiction and such appeal may, notwithstanding anything contained in sec- 418. or section 423 sub-section (2) or in the letters patent or law by which the high court is constituted or continued but subject to the restrictions imposed by clause (b) and clause (c) of sub-section (1) of this section ..... held by a high court in the exercise of its original criminal jurisdiction may, notwithstanding anything contained in section 418 or section 423 sub-section (2) or in the letters patent or law by which the high court is constituted or continued, appeal to the high court:(a) against the conviction on any ground of appeal which involves a matter of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //