Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: gujarat Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 83 results (0.006 seconds)

Jan 23 2001 (HC)

Rajeev Indravadan Modi and ors. Vs. Instance Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. an ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-23-2001

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2010

..... arise. on the contrary, if the argument advanced is accepted, it would, ultimately, result into a situation where the provision granting jurisdiction to the district court for trying patent infringement suits would become redundant. it may also be noted that, at this stage, the defendants have only expressed their intention of making counter-claim and possibility of their ..... separately but in the written statement. admittedly, no written statement is filed. therefore, the contention regarding the transfer of suit under the proviso to section 104 of the patents act under which the application was tendered before trial court cannot be accepted. the proviso specifically provides that where a counter-claim for revocation is made by the defendants, ..... petition challenging the validity before appropriate forum and till that is filed and decided by the competent authority, this hon'ble court is required to consider the validity of a patent in favourof the plaintiffs, and therefore, injunction application is required to be allowed by this honourable court.' 11.1 in paragraph 10 of the affidavit-in-rejoinder, it ..... revisioners, who are the original plaintiffs in civil suit no. 11 of 2000 pending in district court, at vadodara. that suit is preferred by the plaintiffs alleging infringement of registered patent no. 183097 dated march 19, 1998, possessed by the plaintiffs by the defendants. in that suit, application for interim injunction was tendered and the learned assistant judge, vadodara, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2001 (HC)

Satish Maganlal Vora Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-10-2001

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2192

..... and alcohol which the appellant uses and raises the octane level. it was stated by his learned counsel that the appellant had even applied for a patent under patents act, 1970, but the concerned authority returned his application (which was shown to the court) for want of details of the process. however, since ..... the garb of an invented commodity. an invention is a new method, an instrument or device which is created by thought, one for which a patent can be granted. invention cannot be understood in the sense of concoction of a false story, invented to circumvent the statutory provisions enacted to ensure ..... a process for producing such substance (clause f); will not be considered to be inventions. that what is not an invention for the purpose of patents law cannot be consecrated as an invention by the court. otherwise, what the law denounces so very specifically by stating that an invention the use ..... did not want to disclose his trade secret formally, he did not apply again. 18.1 the word 'invention' is defined under section 2(j) of the patent act, which means any new and useful (i) art, process, method or manner of manufacture; (ii) machine, apparatus or other articles; (iii) substance produced ..... torture and agony to him by the impugned action of the respondents. 2.2 in special civil application no. 9076 of 2000 from which the letters patent appeal no. 692 of 2000 arises (in the title of which writ petition, the appellant had also mentioned special civil application no. 5981 of 1999 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2001 (HC)

Ballkhan Doskhan Joya Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-09-2001

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR914]; (2001)3GLR2666

..... the intention of the employer in giving employment as disclosed from the terms of the contract of the employment and the subsequent conduct of the parties.4. in this letters patent appeal, learned counsel appearing for the employee has mainly criticised the reasoning of the learned single judge. it is submitted that the learned single judge erred in holding that although ..... d.m. dharmadhikari, c.j.1. this letters patent appeal by the employee of the gujarat electricity board has been preferred against the order of the learned single judge dated 29-2-2000 passed in special civil application no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2001 (HC)

Champakbhai Parsottambhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-11-2001

Reported in : AIR2001Guj200; (2001)2GLR1814

..... the foregoing paragraphs the uncalled for and unwarranted conduct leading to abuse and misuse the process of the court. there is no slightest hesitation in our mind that this letters patent appeal is absolutely baseless, meritless and frivolous and deserves to be dismissed with the following further directions :- 1. the court fee inspector who has assessed the shortfall of the court ..... judge, on 31-8-2000, and hence this appeal against that order of the learned single judge by invoking the aid of the provisions of clause 15 of the letters patent. 3. at the admission stage, we have heard the learned counsel of the appellant-original petitioner, at marathon length. we have, dispassionately, examined the impugned judgment and order of the ..... order of the learned single judge while viewed in the light of the latest propositions of law and underlined design and desideratum of the provisions of art. 226, this letters patent appeal is deserved to be rejected being totally meritless. this appeal is accordingly rejected. 20. appeal dismissed. ..... j.n. bhatt, j. 1. by this petition under clause 15 of the letters patent, challenge, at the instance of the appellant-original petitioner, is against the orderpassed in tax appeal no. 17 of 1998 by the director of transport, gujarat state which came to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2001 (HC)

Sonia Joseph Gonsalves Vs. Joseph Avroz Gonsalves

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-23-2001

Reported in : (2002)1GLR43; (2002)1GLR432

..... subject to the superintendence of the said high court, where the judge who passed the judgment declares that the case is a fit one for appeal; .....' under the letters patent, various jurisdictions are conferred on the high court. broadly classified, they are ordinary original civil jurisdiction, extraordinary original civil jurisdiction, appellate jurisdiction from subordinate courts, jurisdiction as to ..... the judgment, letters patent appeal will not lie against an order arising out of such review application. exercise of powerand passing of any order in revisional jurisdiction or power otherwise also is ..... are not appealable under clause 15. this proposition is extensively explored, exhaustively expounded and very well settled requiring no further detailed or meticulous articulation of principles.5. letters patent appeal does not lie against an order refusing to review the judgment passed in revisional jurisdiction also for the simple reason that if an appeal does not lie against ..... their privy council, as hereinafter provided.'4. it could very well be visualised from the plain perusal of the aforesaid provision that the clause 15 of the letters patent providing for intra-court appeal will not be attracted if the impugned order is in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. an order of a single judge exercising revisionat jurisdiction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2001 (HC)

Core Healthcare Ltd. Vs. Standard Chartered Bank and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-23-2001

Reported in : [2001]107CompCas501(Guj)

..... that this court could justify and intervene when an order of a tribunal is (i) violative of the fundamental basic principles of justice and fair play or (ii) where a patent or flagrant error in procedure or law has crept in or (iii) where the order passed results in manifest injustice. it was further submitted that both the second and third .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2001 (HC)

Jahid Habibbhai Shipai Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-07-2001

Reported in : (2001)3GLR1957

..... papers would have been with the advocate engaged by the detenu and to take those documents from the advocate would have been a time-consuming factor. there is yet another patent difficulty with the detenu if this course is made applicable in his case. firstly, he is in jail and it is difficult for him to collect this material from his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2001 (HC)

Patel Nimeshbhai Jashubhai and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-07-2001

Reported in : (2001)3GLR2714

..... recognition. this view is confirmed by a division bench of this court (coram : d.m. dharmadhikari, c.j. and c.k. thakker, j. as his lordship then was) in letters patent appeal no. 1451 of 1999 dhanjay prahlad bhole v. state of gujarat, with an observation as under :'it is true that ultimately students who had studied in the petitioner-institution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2001 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Khasia Gabha Bhupat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-15-2001

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3086

..... in pointing out any perversity in the judgment acquitting the accused. this court after several years should go very slow in disturbing the finality of acquittal where there is no patent illegality or material error in the order of acquittal. learned counsel has relied on a judgment for this purpose, reported in state of gujarat v. shreeji agrico and ors. reported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2001 (HC)

B.A. Mewada Vs. Director, Govt. Printing and Stationery Department and ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-17-2001

Reported in : (2001)2GLR1570

..... to be allowed quashing the judgment and order of gujarat civil service tribunal in appeals.2. a few relevant and material facts giving rise to this group of five letters patent appeal, at the instance of the employees may be highlighted, at this stage, so as to appreciate the merits of the appeals and the challenge against them. the entire controversy ..... in this appeal. the decisionof the learned single judge on this issue also does not appear to be illegal so as to attract the power of letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent.14. the learned advocate of the appellants-employees has thereafter argued that even if the upgradation is upheld, the upgradation should have retrospective effect from 1 ..... . the present appellants felt aggrieved by the said judgment and order of the learned single judge dated 8-2-2000, and have therefore, preterred this letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent, mainly on the ground that the state government could not frame rules so as to retrospectively apply to the employees already in service. it has also been ..... due and proper calculation within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order. we, therefore, allow these letters patent appeals of the appellants above-named to the extent indicated above. the rest of the prayers in these letters patent appeals of the appellants-employees for directing the respondents to continue them in class iv service and to extend the benefits .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //