Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: gujarat Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 76 results (0.007 seconds)

Jan 09 2002 (HC)

Gopi Cinema Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-09-2002

Reported in : AIR2002Guj296

..... try. cheating, on the other hand, is not the exclusive preserve of the elite. it is practised up and down the economic scale, signified by misrepresentation, trickery, concealment, and 'a patently lame and untenable excuse'.' 4.9 he has relied upon the judgment of this court in the case of linder frank wolfgang v. yogesh d. shan, suptd. of customs reported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2002 (HC)

Food Corporation of India Vs. Gandhidham Municipality

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-09-2002

Reported in : (2002)2GLR917

jayant patel, j. 1. the present appeal is preferred against the order, dated 17-8-1994 passed by the learned single judge of this court (coram : a. p. ravani, j.), in special civil application no. 12701 of 1993 whereby the petition came to be rejected. the division bench of this court had admitted this appeal on 24-11-1994 and it is reported to us that pending this appeal the appellant-corporation has continued to pay the municipal taxes to the respondent-municipality. 2. on behalf of the appellant-corporation mr. n. k. pahwa for mr. p. m. thakkar raised the contention that the food corporation of india, being an instrumentality of the state government, is not liable to pay municipal taxes in view of article 285 of the constitution. this contention in substance, is that the land was originally owned by government of india and the said land is given to the appellant-corporation for the purpose of construction of godowns and the appellant-corporation is a statutory corporation, no doubt, is owned by government of india, and therefore, in view of section 99 of the gujarat municipalities act read with article 285 of the constitution no tax can be levied upon the property constructed by the appellant-corporation. 3. another contention raised by mr. pahwa is that since in respect of the some part of the property they are holding the land allotted by kandla port trust, and the tenure of the land is on leave and licence basis, and such tenure of the licence has not exceeded 11 months .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2002 (HC)

Municipal Corporation of the City of Surat Vs. B.M. Transport and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-10-2002

Reported in : AIR2002Guj306; (2002)2GLR1591

b.c. patel, j. 1. appellant-municipal corporation of city of surat (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the corporation') has preferred these appeals against the common judgment delivered by the learned single judge in special civil application nos. 8482, 6859, 6835 and 7631 of 1990 on 1-2-1996. 2. the original petitioners who are respondents in these appeals except the indian oil corporation (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the i.o.c.') were transporters and were engaged in transporting the products of i.o.c. through their tankers. while transporting the products of the i.o.c., drivers of the tankers were required to pass through the limits of the corporation and the corporation was thus entitled to levy the octroi. in the case of export of the same material, the corporation was duty-bound to refund the amount. however, to make the procedure easy and to facilitate the transporters, it seems that the commissioner of the corporation exercised powers under the provisions contained in bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the b.p.m.c. act') and under the standing orders framed under section 466(1) read with section 147 made provision for supervision charges to be collected from the transporters for carrying the goods through the limits of the corporation under the supervision of the staff of the corporation without paying octroi. it appears that initially, the corporation was charging rs. 2/- and the rate was increased thereafter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2002 (HC)

Shital C. Joshi Vs. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-21-2002

Reported in : (2003)4GLR674

..... and on the other hand came to the conclusion that the process of selection got vitiated on account of alleged irregularity and illegality. in our considered opinion, the division bench patently committed an error in relying upon the report of the commission and in recording a finding that irregularities have been committed in the selection notwithstanding the fact that the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2002 (HC)

Patel Ratilal Maganbhai and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-23-2002

Reported in : (2003)1GLR562

..... . patel has drawn our attention to the judgment of the division bench (coram : mr. k. g. balakrishnan, c.j. & mr. justice j. n. bhatt) dated 2-9-1999 in letters patent appeal no. 1153 of 1998 in special civil application no. 6265 of 1998 in the case of legal heirs of mithabhai mavjibhai v. state of gujarat. before the division bench ..... jayant patel, j.1. in the present letters patent appeal, the main question arises for the consideration of this court is that whether this court should exercise the powers under article 226 of the constitution of india at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2002 (HC)

Kaushik Kantilal Trivedi and anr. Vs. Secretary, Gujarat Public Servic ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-24-2002

Reported in : (2002)3GLR83

..... or revenue-agent. section 4 of that act provided :'every person now or hereafter entered as an advocate or vakil on the roll of any high court under the letters patent constituting such court, or under section 41 of this act, or enrolled as a pleader in the chief court of the punjab under section 8 of this act, shall be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2002 (HC)

Varvabhai Nathabhai Rabari and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-28-2002

Reported in : (2003)1GLR97

jayant patel, j.1. the present letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6-11-2001 passed by the learned single judge of this court in special civil application no. 7443 of 2001.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2002 (HC)

Nilesh Bhogilal Dave Vs. Tikoo Traders Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-29-2002

Reported in : (2002)4GLR3184

..... , agreeing with the views and observations of the labour court, summarily dismissed the writ petition, and that is how the workman is prompted to invoke clause 15 of the letters patent by filing this appeal questioning and challenging the summary dismissal of the writ petition.7. the learned advocate mr. lakhia for the appellant-original petitioner-workman, in his marathon submissions ..... appellant herein-original petitioner-workman, have not only startled us but, unfortunately, have shattered and tremored our conscience.2. the appellant, invoking the aids of clause 15 of the letters patent, in this appeal, has questioned the legality and validity of the judgment, dated 27.6.2001, of the learned single judge, whereby, the award of the labour court in reference ..... ultimate conclusions recorded by the labour court and approved by the learned single judge.9. in the result, therefore, we are left with no alternative but to dismiss this letters patent appeal at the threshold. accordingly, it is dismissed summarily. civil application also shall stand dismissed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2002 (HC)

Gsfc Vs. Mcm Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-30-2002

Reported in : AIR2002Guj287; (2002)4GLR2789

..... of the learned advocate mr. dave is rejected.2. gujarat state finance corporation (hereinafter to be referred to as 'gsfc') has preferred letters patent appeal no. 784 of 2000 while m/s. hotel satyaketu has preferred letters patent appeal no. 790 of 2000 against the judgment delivered by the learned single judge in special civil application no. 8010 of 2000 on 18 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2002 (HC)

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Pravinchandra C. Khatiwala

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-31-2002

Reported in : AIR2002Guj374

..... were without any authority of law and therefore, the notices were quashed. against the said decision of the learned single judge, the state of gujarat has preferred the present letters patent appeals.4. we have heard the learned assistant govt. pleader ms. manisha lavkumar and mr. s. a. desai, learned advocate appearing on behalf of mr. y. n. oza. clause 20b ..... jayant patel, j.1. the present letters patent appeals are preferred by the state of gujarat against the judgment dated 22-3-1996, passed by the learned single judge of this court in special civil application nos. 933 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //