Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: gujarat Year: 2002 Page 2 of about 76 results (0.006 seconds)

Feb 01 2002 (HC)

Pravinbhai Jagjivandas Mehta Vs. Officine Lovato S.P.A.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-01-2002

Reported in : 2002(25)PTC161(Guj)

..... before the plaintiff applied for registration under the designs act or the copyright act. the first defendant has also produced certificates of registrations of the designs, which are. registered with patent office (design office) of india informing the first defendant on 12th july 2001.7.2. the first defendant has denied the plaintiffs averments that he has spent huge amounts for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2002 (HC)

Nandlal Bavanjibhai Posiya and ors. Vs. Director of Agriculture Market ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-08-2002

Reported in : AIR2002Guj348; (2002)2GLR1132

..... vacated. the petition is dismissed. it is directed that no-confidence motion passed against petitioner nos. 1 and 2 shall now be the result, both the letters patent appeals and both the special civil applications are hereby dismissed. all pending civil applications stand disposed of and interim orders are vacated.rule is discharged. however, in the circumstances, ..... to discharge duties of chairman of social justice committee. after the learned single judge (m. s. shah, j.), dismissed the petition by the order impugned in this letters patent appeal, interim order was continued by the division bench, and as a result thereof, learned counsel for the appellant now informs, that not only mat the petitioner has completed ..... 7278 of 2001 is also concerning moving and passing of no-confidence motion against the chairman of junagadh agricultural produce market committee. letters patent appeal no. 1451 of 1997 is concerning moving and passing of no-confidence motion against the chairman of social justice committee under section 123 of the gujarat panchayats act, ..... of an order of status quo passed by the learned single judge in special civil application no. 9842 of 2001. special civil application no. 5120 of 2001 and letters patent appeal no. 1177 of 2001 are cognate matters concerning moving and passing of no-confidence motion against the chairman of agricultural produce market committee, valsad. special civil application no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2002 (HC)

Krupaben B. Trivedi Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-14-2002

Reported in : (2002)2GLR1631

order the tenure of smt. krupaben b. trivedi, as the gujarat affiliated colleges services tribunal, is brought to an end with immediate effect. by the order of and in the name of the governor of gujarat. (r. a. dave) deputy secretary to the government, department of education (rendered into english from gujarati) 9. the learned single judge, by the order under appeal, rejected the contentions advanced on behalf of the petitioner that the statutory rules do not regulate the terms and conditions of a person appointed as tribunal from bar. the learned single judge came to the conclusion as under :'..... in view of the statutory provision governing the service conditionof the petitioner, the government could not have prescribed the term of appointment which was contrary to the statutory provision. if such a contract has been entered into, the same being contrary to the statutory provisions, shall have no binding effect and the statutory provision shall prevail over the terms and conditions stipulated under the aforesaid government resolution.'so far as the resolution of the government dated 29-12-1997 which was passed during the pendency of the public interest litigation for regulating the terms and conditions of such services of the petitioner is concerned, the learned single judge made the following observations :'it is contended that after the appointment of persons to various tribunals as discussed hereinabove, for a long time the service conditions of such persons were not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2002 (HC)

Rajendraprasad Shankarlal Purohit Vs. Executive Engineer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-20-2002

Reported in : (2002)4GLR2819

..... state of gujarat by filing special civil application no. 473 of 2000 which came to be summarily dismissed by this court by order dated 31st january, 2000 and the letters patent appeal no. 147 of 2000 filed by the state of gujarat against that order was also dismissed by the division bench of this court on 8.5.2000. thereafter, by ..... and he deemed to be in service for all purposes.the petitioner rajendraprasad shankarlal purohit had filed further affidavit in reply in civil application no. 6666 of 2002 in letters patent appeal no. 1067 of 2002 dated february, 2003. in the said affidavit in reply, it was averred by the petitioner that the services of one shri mayank ramanlal joshi who ..... contention regarding the project coming to an end during the pendency of the reference be considered and decided as early as possible, preferably within one month from today. the letters patent appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent and main, special civil application is remanded to the learned single judge only on this point. no order as to costs.'the appellate ..... months from the date of receipt of the order. accordingly, the reference was allowed.2. this decision was challenged by the respondent in letters patent appeal no.1067 of 2002. the division bench has decided the letters patent appeal on 7th october, 2003. the division bench has confirmed the order passed by this court in respect of granting 50% of back wages .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2002 (HC)

M.V. Asean Jade Vs. Jaisu Shipping Com. Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-27-2002

Reported in : AIR2000Guj241

..... the bifurcation of the bilingual state of bombay on 7th january, 1957. these rules are framed under section 129 of the civil procedure code, 1908 read with clause 37 of the letters patent, these rules include rules regulating the procedure and practices of cases brought before the high court of bombay under the colonial courts of admiralty act, 1890. this is the law .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2002 (HC)

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. A.M. Shaikh

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-11-2002

Reported in : (2002)2GLR1807

..... no. 393 of 2000 decided by this court on 27th january, 2000), similar question was examined by this court and the petition filed by the corporation was rejected. thereafter, letters patent appeal no. 905 of 2000 was preferred by the corporation against the order passed by the learned single judge of this court wherein the division bench of this court has ..... rejected the letters patent appeal by order dated 12-3-2001. thereafter, special leave petition no. 12607 of 2001 was preferred before the hon'ble supreme court and the said special leave petition was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2002 (HC)

Suresh Kumar Dutt Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-14-2002

Reported in : (2002)3GLR813

..... by the original petitioner and approved by the learned single judge is required to be confirmed and affirmed by us while dismissing the letters patent appeal on merits, even if the analogous provisions of res judicata are not taken into consideration for the dismissal of the appeal on technical ..... record of the present case, which would warrant the interference of this court in exercise of appellate powers under clause 15 of the letters patent. the learned single judge, upon appraisal and evaluation of the facts and the ambit of the powers of the respondent-authority in condonation of ..... law, rejected the writ petition, and hence, this letters patent appeal. 8. after having considered the long litigating journey, again we are called upon to consider the merits of the claim of the original petitioner ..... afresh consideration and decision according to law on merits by order dated 4-9-1996 in letters patent appeal no. 360 of 1996. the learned single judge again, on consideration of the facts and circumstances and the relevant proposition and rules and ..... and filed writ petition being special civil application no. 1505 of 1995, which was also rejected by the learned single judge. however, in letters patent appeal no. 360 of 1996 challenging the order of the learned single judge, the division bench of this court directed learned single judge for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2002 (HC)

Lark Laboratories (India) Ltd. Vs. Medico Interpharma Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-15-2002

Reported in : AIR2002Guj368; (2003)4GLR52

..... marketing its product under the alleged trade mark 'polymox'. the plaintiff received the letters from the defendant no. 2 and also a notice from m/s. paramount trade marks companies, patent and trade marks attorneys. in reply to said notice, the plaintiff has served registered notice through their advocates to the defendant no. 2, directing to stop use of trade mark .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2002 (HC)

Mukeshbhai Bhavanji Thakkar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-18-2002

Reported in : (2002)4GLR2981

..... . public prosecutor. the oral submissions made by mr. saurin shah if ignored, even then this court does not feel that the finding recorded by the ld. addl. sessions judge either patently illegal or perverse and contrary to the basic principle of criminal jurisprudence. in the case before the apex court, re-investigation was requested before the magistrate where the apex court ..... be erroneous or perverse. mr. ss patel ld. app for the state has supported the case of prosecution placed before the trial court and the state has not found any patent illegality in the order passed by the ld. addl. sessions judge. the ratio of the apex court in the case of randhir singh rana vs. the state being delhi administration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2002 (HC)

Gujarat Agricultural University Vs. All Gujarat Kamdar Karmachari Unio ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-22-2002

Reported in : (2002)3GLR693

d.h. waghela, j.1. this group of 65 letters patent appeals is preferred from a common judgment of this court, whereby, 65 petitions of the appellant challenging the award of the industrial tribunal, ahmedabad were dismissed. by the award of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //