Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: gujarat Year: 2002 Page 3 of about 76 results (0.006 seconds)

Mar 27 2002 (HC)

Mahendrabhai T. Kapadia Vs. Pritesh Dahyabhai Rathod

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-27-2002

Reported in : (2002)4GLR3217

..... preferred these criminal revision applications against the impugned order. however, without going into the issue of 'locus' of the present petitioner, i am of the view that there is no patent illegality or perversity in the impugned order passed by the ld. executive magistrate. the order reveals correct set of facts available on record and in view of statutory embargo provided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2002 (HC)

Chandravadan Chunilal Shah and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-01-2002

Reported in : AIR2002Guj416; (2002)3GLR1

..... and 3 and mr. d. c. dave, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4, at length and in great detail.2. the instant appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent is directed against the judgment and order, dated 29-6-2001 rendered by the learned single judge in spl. c. a. no. 267 of 1997 between chandravadan chunilal shah and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hazarat Pir Shah-e-alam Roza Estate Tru ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-11-2002

Reported in : [2002]256ITR193(Guj)

..... section 4(3)(i) of the indian income-tax act, 1922, and section 11 of the income-tax act, 1961.(i) a division bench judgment of this court in letters patent appeal in sayed mohomed baquir-el-edroos valde sayed jaffer-ei-edroos sajjadnashin of edroos gadi v. alimiya mahmadmiya 13 glr 285, was cited for the proposition that the statutory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2002 (HC)

Cit Vs. Hazarat Pir Shah-e-alam Roza Estate Trust

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-11-2002

Reported in : (2002)175CTR(Guj)66

..... 4(3)(1) of the indian income tax act, 1922 and section 11 of the income tax act, 1961. (i) a division bench judgment of this court in a letters patent appeal in sayed mohomed baquir-e1-edroos valde sayed jaffer-e1-edroos sajjadnashin of edroos gadi v. alimiya mahmadmiya 13 glr 285 was cited for the proposition that the statutory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2002 (HC)

D.B. Jadeja and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-17-2002

Reported in : (2002)4GLR3705

..... identical petition being special civil application no. 7130 of 1999. however, this petition has been summarily rejected, against which, said six petitioners had preferred letters patent appeal being l.p.a. no. 1324 of 1999 and said l.p.a. is also finally decided by this court [coram : mr. m. ..... made in the rejoinder filed by the petitioners. therefore, in pursuance of the directions issued by the division bench of this court in letters patent appeal no. 222 of 2001 and accordingly five posts of class iv employees are kept vacant with the state government. in light of these facts ..... agents to keep five posts of class iv employees vacant for the appellants, in the event of their success in this case. thereafter, this letters patent appeal has been finally heard and disposed of by the division bench of this court on date 26m june, 2001, whereby the division bench has ..... said ad-interim relief pending the present petition and vacated the ad-interim relief granted earlier. against the order vacating the ad-interim relief, letters patent appeal no. 222 of 2001 filed on 23rd march, 2001, wherein the l.p.a. bench has passed the order on 3rd april, 2001 ..... was decided and interim relief granted in the said application earlier came to be vacated, and therefore, being aggrieved thereof, the petitioners immediately preferred letters patent appeal no. 222 of 2001. thereafter, the respondent no. 2 has issued order of termination on 23rd march, 2001 and sending therewith retrenchment compensation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2002 (HC)

Sunil Bhalchandra Jani Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-18-2002

Reported in : [2002(93)FLR1050]; (2002)2GLR1379

..... beyond its jurisdiction, refusal to exercise jurisdiction, error of law apparent on record as distinguished from a mere mistake of law, arbitrary or capricious exercise of authority or discretion, a patent error in procedure, arriving at a finding which is perverse or based on no material or resulting in manifest injustice. as regards finding of fact of the inferior court, the ..... of record as also in cases where the orders impugned represent an arbitrary or capricious exercise of the authority or discretion and even in cases where the order suffers from patent error or procedure or even in the cases where the exercise of powers represent a finding on me basis of no material or is likely to result in manifest injustice .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2002 (HC)

Popatlal Gokaldas Shah and anr. Vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-18-2002

Reported in : 2003ACJ422; AIR2003Guj44; (2002)3GLR327

..... thereof. the liability has arisen and has been sought to be enforced by the claimants under the law of torts. the finding recorded in the suit and in the letters patent appeal is one of negligence on the part of the municipal corporation. to such an action section 478 does not apply at all. the suit filed within a period of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2002 (HC)

Sagar Raiyaka, Chairman, G.i.D.C. and ors. Vs. B.S. Saraswati, Senior ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-23-2002

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3465; (2002)3GLR589

..... the offence alleged against the accused, court should not quash the complaint. at the same time, if the allegations do not constitute any offence as alleged and appear to be patently absurd and improbable, the court should not hesitate to quash the complaint. it is further observed that mere fact that the offence was committed during the course of a commercial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2002 (HC)

Shakuntala P. Devlekar Vs. Surat Municipal Corporation

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-30-2002

Reported in : (2003)4GLR154

r.k. abichandani, adv.1. these letters patent appeals have been directed against the common judgment and order dated 1st august 1989 passed by the learned single judge in a group of petitions in which the petitioners had .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2002 (HC)

Shriram Vinyl and Chemical Industries Vs. Bisil Plast Ltd. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-02-2002

Reported in : (2002)3GLR492

..... .) 84) and has positively concluded that the transaction is commercial and element of criminality is missing. it is established proposition of law that unless finding of the subordinate court is patently illegal or perverse and if the same is not reversed and corrected, there shall be miscarriage of justice, only then revisional jurisdiction should be exercised. none of these elements are .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //