Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: gujarat Year: 2002 Page 5 of about 76 results (0.007 seconds)

Jul 25 2002 (HC)

Morarji Desai Textile Labour Co-operative Industries Ltd. Vs. Thakoreb ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-25-2002

Reported in : (2003)IILLJ129Guj

..... by him in this petition, but no mandamus can be issued so as to override the provisions of the act of 1985.'this decision came to be challenged in letters patent appeal no. 1603 of 1999. before the division bench it was mentioned on behalf of the appellant/petitioner of that case that necessary application for obtaining consent of the bifr .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2002 (HC)

Babhubhai Maganbhai Patanwadia (Decd.) Through Heirs and L.Rs. Vs. Reg ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-25-2002

Reported in : (2004)IIILLJ236Guj

..... to be rejected.'5. the court ultimately partly allowed the appeals. i have been informed that being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid order, e.s.i. corporation filed letters patent appeal no. 1910 to 1964 of 1999 and the division bench of this court (coram: m.r. calla and r.r. tripathi, jj) dismissed all the letters ..... patent appeals by its judgment and order dated october 5, 2000 on the ground that the appeal is not maintainable.6. mr. shashikant gade, learned counsel for the e.s.i. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2002 (HC)

Pravinbhai Jagjivandas Mehta Vs. Officine Lovato S.P.A.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-06-2002

Reported in : 2002(25)PTC398(Guj)

..... in question, even before the appellant applied, for registration under the designs act or the copyright act, were also produced. the certificates of registrations of the designs, registered with the patent office (design office) were also relied upon. according to the respondent no. 1, on coming to know about the designs of the appellant, it deputed three persons to meet the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2002 (HC)

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Mayurkumar I. Sh ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-08-2002

Reported in : (2003)1GLR554; (2003)IILLJ407Guj

..... -workman and confirmed by the learned single judge in writ petition by order, dated 7-1-2002 by invoking the aids of the provisions of clause 15 of the letters patent.2. short skeleton, factual profile relevant and material for the issue in controversy may be at the outset highlighted with a view to appreciate the merits and challenge against the ..... and the learned single judge dismissed the petition upholding the award made by the labour court in favour of the respondent-workman, and hence, this letters patent appeal by invocation of clause 15 of letters patent.3a. ordinarily, this court would not investigate or re-examine the factual aspects. there are special circumstances and reasons which we have successfully noticed in course ..... liable for delay in payment and interest for which it will be open for the respondent-workman to move this court for further directions in this behalf.since, the letters patent appeal has been disposed of on merits, there shallbe no orders on the civil application.

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2002 (HC)

Digvijay Cement and Asbestos Mazdoor Sabha Vs. State of Gujarat and an ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-08-2002

Reported in : (2003)2GLR992; (2003)ILLJ795Guj

..... , 2002. being aggrieved by the impugned order of the learned single judge dated 21st february, 2002, the appellant-original petitioner has filed this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent. 5. heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the relevant papers on record. the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the statutory provisions of section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2002 (HC)

Jansukhlal Chhaganlal Nagori Vs. Regional Manager, Union Bank of India

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-19-2002

Reported in : (2003)1GLR614; (2003)IILLJ451Guj

..... . 3052 of 1988, which was dismissed by the learned single judge of this court by judgment dated 22nd june, 1988. against the judgment dismissing the petition, the petitioner preferred letters patent appeal before the division bench of this court which was also dismissed and the order terminating the service of the petition has become final as no further proceedings were preferred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2002 (HC)

Anish Rameshbhai Patel and anr. Vs. Abbasbhai Mahmadali Vania and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-20-2002

Reported in : (2003)1GLR474

..... and bind the parties. in para 7 thereof it was held thus : 'in the above view, we have taken, the high court has committed grievous error of jurisdiction and also patent illegality in treating the application filed by the appellant as barred by limitation and the third one on res judicaia. once, the application, dated 25-5-1979 was made, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2002 (HC)

Kalubhai Bhagvanbhai Karmata Vs. Mamlatdar Talala (Gir) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-04-2002

Reported in : AIR2003Guj237

..... aside with the direction that the respondent authorities shall reconsider the matter afresh keeping in view of the above referred observations made by the division bench in the aforesaid letters patent appeal no. 1670/99 and the observations made by this court in this judgment and shall render decision within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of ..... material for the purpose of discarding nor not relying on the part of the authorities is running contrary to the observations of the division bench in the above referred letters patent appeal no. 1670/99 and in my view the authority should be directed to decide the issue on the question of issuance of certificate keeping in view the observations made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2002 (HC)

Rajnagar Textiles Mills No. 1 Vs. Textile Labour Association

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-17-2002

Reported in : (2003)ILLJ38Guj

..... consideration all the relevant materials and circumstances, facts and aspects is fully justified requiring no interference in exercise of powers under clause 15 of the letters patent. therefore one and only fate which this letters patent appeal deserves to be met with is dismissal at the admission stage. accordingly, it is dismissed with costs, which is quantified at rs. 3000/- 4. the ..... orderj.n. bhatt, j. 1. the challenge in this letters patent appeal by invocation of clause 15 of the letters patent act, is against the judgment and order dated february 23, 1998 rendered by the learned single judge in special civil application no. 3691 of 1997, whereby a challenge against the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2002 (HC)

Nirmalaben Waghela Vs. Raman Maheriya, Deputy Secretary, Urban Develop ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-18-2002

Reported in : (2003)1GLR505

..... order dated 3-9-2002, under the provisions of section 263 of the gujarat municipalities act, 1963, the opponent has interfered with the due course of judicial proceedings in letters patent appeal no. 466 of 2002, and thereby, obstructed the administration of justice also, which amounts to criminal contempt as envisaged in the contempt of courts act, 1971, hereinafter called 'the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //