Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: gujarat Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 66 results (0.007 seconds)

Jan 15 2004 (HC)

Sapjaybhai R. Patel Vs. Assessing Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : [2004]135TAXMAN210(Guj)

..... mistake apparent from the record of assessments of the firm. the hon'ble supreme court has further held that a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistakes and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may be conceivably section a decision on a debatable point .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (HC)

Aop of Sanjaybhai R. Patel and 11 ors. Vs. Assessing Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(Guj)583

..... a mistake apparent from the record of assessments of the firm. the honble supreme court has further held that a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may be conceivably two opinions. a decision on a debatable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (HC)

Aop of Sanjaybhai R. Patel and 11 ors. Vs. Assessing Officer - Asstt. ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : [2004]267ITR129(Guj)

..... mistake apparent from the record of assessments of the firm. the hon'ble supreme court has further held that a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may be conceivably two opinions. a decision on a debatable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2004 (HC)

Rohit Chunubhai Mehta Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizer Co. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-17-2004

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2298; (2004)3GLR1952

..... justified in embarking upon an inquiry as to the reliability or genuineness of the allegations. these are not cases where no case is made out or where the allegations were patently absurd. as held by this court in k.c.sethi v. state of gujarat [2003 (1) glh 82], truthfulness of allegations is a matter of trial and real state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2004 (HC)

Rajkot Municipal Corporation Vs. Punjabhai Ratubhai Waghela

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-20-2004

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR338]

..... financial irregularities. award of reinstatement with full back wages was made by the labour court in his favour. writ filed by the gsrtc was dismissed and thereafter, in the letters patent appeal filed by the gsrtc, it was held that the proceedings and standard of proof required in domestic enquiry lenient than the one required in criminal trial. in the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2004 (HC)

Gujarat Maritime Board Vs. Kanji Natha Karmata

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-29-2004

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR1226]

bhawani singh, c.j. 1. through this letters patent appeal, order of thelearned single judge dated 1.7.1994 passed in specialcivil application no. 1832 of 1993 has been challenged.kanji natha karmata (petitioner) applied for appointmenton compassionate ground, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2004 (HC)

M.B. Phanse Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-03-2004

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1299

..... of the order ought to have made areference to the pendency of the letters patent appeal,which according to mr.trivedi, the learned advocate forthe petitioner, was brought to his notice. if that isso, it is not proper on his part to escape suchreference. be ..... standtaken by the state government that theservice rendered by a retired person asmember or president of the gcst and isnot pensionable.'but then, against that order, it is reported thatletters patent appeal no.1156 of 1999 is filed, which isadmitted on 29th october, 2001 by this court(coram:j.n.bhatt & d.h.waghela, jj.) and the same ispending.the author ..... of thesaid judgement is quoted in the impugned order, as it wascited before the authority.mr.m.s.rao, learned agp, is not able to point outfiling of any letters patent appeal against the aforesaiddecision, cited by mr.trivedi. not only that, nojudgement to the contrary either of the learned singlejudge or the division bench is cited.this court is in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2004 (HC)

Mayooriben J. Thakore Vs. Gujarat Agro Industries

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-05-2004

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR8]; (2004)2GLR1707

..... decided by the judgment and order dated 4.4.2000, the management has reinstated the petitioner and that fact is recorded in the order of the division bench in letters patent appeal. taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, particularly the fact that the petitioner is reinstated in service by the management, the request is granted. the operation and implementation of this ..... december 31, 1990. thereafter, it will be open to either parties to request for fixed date of hearing.'the matter was then heard finally and disposed, against which, a letters patent appeal was preferred wherein an order was passed and as stated hereinabove, the matter was remitted back for fresh hearing.4. the short question for the consideration of this court ..... petition was heard finally and disposed of by the learned single judge (mr. justice c.k. thakkar, as he then was). being aggrieved of that, the respondents had filed letters patent appeal being lpa no.162 of 2000, which came to be allowed by judgment and order dated 19th august 2003 (coram: mr. justice b.j. shethna & mr. justice ravi r .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2004 (HC)

Joshi Tushar Tansukhbhai and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-25-2004

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1188

..... of theconstitution is meritless and without any substance. theimpugned government resolution is upheld and we confirmand affirm the views of the learned single judge in theimpugned judgment and, the letters patent appeal,therefore, shall stand dismissed leaving the parties tobear their own costs. notice is discharged. however,the recommendations made by the learned single judge inthe impugned judgment are quite weighty ..... the administrativedecisions referable to pay-fixation and parity of pay.the courts should approach such matters with restraintand interfere only when they are satisfied that thedecision of the government is patently irrational, unjustand prejudicial to a section of employees and thegovernment, while taking the decision, has ignoredfactors which are material and relevant for a decision inthe matter though it is a ..... bythe learned single judge could not be said to be in anyway to be unjust, unreasonable or vulnerable, requiringour interference in exercise of our powers underclause-15 of the letters patent.13. the learned single judge has also placed relianceon the judgment of single bench in special civilapplication no. 5218 of 1998. in the said decision, thescheme, virtually, identical, which was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2004 (HC)

Poul Cyril Parmar Vs. District Education Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-01-2004

Reported in : (2004)2GLR482

..... the respondents to work out the petitioners claim for pension within reasonable time and in case not more than six months. against the said judgment no letters patent appeal has been preferred. the petitioner, therefore, submits that the respondents have not complied with the direction given by the learned single judge, instead they ..... has appeared on their behalf.6. having gone through the record of these petitions and in particular the judgment of the division bench delivered in letters patent appeal no. 788 of 1998, it is clear that the factor that weighed with the apex court for remanding the matter to this court for ..... them discriminatory treatment by not extending to them the benefit of the pension scheme.2.1 the said decision came to be challenged by way of letters patent appeal and since it was time barred, civil application no. 11548 of 1998 was also filed alongwith it. the division bench of this court vide ..... by the division bench of this court (coram : m.r. calla, n.g. nandi, jj.) vide judgment dated 31st july, 2001 rendered in letters patent appeal no. 788 of 1998 in special civil application no. 3635 of 1982, they have been heard together and now they are being disposed of by this ..... is likely to affect a large number of persons and also considering the explanation furnished by the appellants for the delay in filing the letters patent appeal, we feel that this matter requires to be finally decided by the high court.keeping in view the larger interests, we condone the delay .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //