Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: himachal pradesh Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.015 seconds)

Mar 06 1980 (HC)

Smt. Dayawanti and ors. Vs. Kirpa Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-06-1980

Reported in : AIR1981HP6

..... impugned order closing the evidence.4. shri chhabil dass sood appearing on behalf of the petitioners has contended that the order of the rent controller dated 28-11-77 is patently wrong and without jurisdiction and that the petitioners could not be directed or ordered to take dasti summons for the witness who was an employee of the municipal committee. it .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 1980 (HC)

State of Himachal Pradesh and anr. Vs. Motilal Partap Singh and Co. an ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-20-1980

Reported in : AIR1981HP8

v.d. misra, c.j.1. this letters patent appeal by the state is directed against the judgment of mr. justice c, r. thakur allowing the writ petition of the respondents.2. khasra nos. 166, 134 and 57 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1980 (HC)

Sher Singh Mehta Vs. the Kailash District Co-operative Marketing and S ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-21-1980

Reported in : AIR1981HP23

..... have been given in the order for condoning the delay. in fact, that was also not the prayer of respondent no. 1. such an act of respondent no. 3, is patently, in violation of the principles of natural justice. as such, this court in the exercise of its powers under article 226 of the constitution of india, is empowered to do .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 30 1980 (HC)

Asa Singh and ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-30-1980

Reported in : AIR1981HP75

..... entitled to claim compensation as they are not the legal representatives of the deceased. we find no force in these contentions. this court while deciding the letters patent appeal can go into all questions of fact and law in such like matters in the interest of law and justice. similarly, we are not satisfied that ..... power of the court imposed by ss. 100 and 101 of the code of civil procedure cannot be made applicable to an appellate court hearing a letters patent appeal from the judgment of a single judge of that high court in a first appeal from the judgment and decree of the court subordinate to the high ..... are right in dismissing the application for condoning the delay in filing the claim petition, and whether we can go into this question at the stage of a letters patent appeal. to start with, the learned counsel for the appellants has referred to a decision in asha devi v. dukhi sao, (air 1974 bc 2048) to ..... of the high court. the only question is whether the power of a division bench hearing a letters patent appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent of patna high court or its analogous provisions in the letters patent of other high courts is limited only to a question of law under section 100 of the code of ..... appeal on the ground that the claim petition was barred by limitation.4. the appellants filed a petition for seeking leave to file, a letters patent appeal. the learned single judge by an order dated 7-8-1972 was pleased to certify that the case was fit to file a letters .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //