Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: kolkata Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 30 results (0.009 seconds)

Jan 21 1958 (HC)

W. Wood and Son Ltd. Vs. Bengal Corporation

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-21-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Cal8

..... are as follows : the appellant company is the manufacturer of a well-known make of suit-cases, known as revelation suit-cases, and it was expanding hinges, hasps and locks, patented by it, in the manufacture of its goods. on 19-10-1951, the appellant company entered into a contract with the respondent firm, whereby it granted the respondent an exclusive .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1958 (HC)

Mcleod and Co. Vs. Sixth Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1958Cal273

..... disregarded such amendments of the statute in coming to the conclusion that the respondent was a workman. i am also of the opinion that the tribunal's decision contains a patent error in so far as he held that even though the respondent supervised the work of other clerks, he remained a clerk even after the amendment of the statute, and ..... the law or inference from such fact that he still remained a clerk 2nd, therefore, was a workman within the meaning of the industrial disputes act is a manifest error patent on the face of the proceedings and within the doctrine laid down by the supreme court in the kamath decision. 13. it is necessary to emphasise here that the proper ..... on clear ignorance and disregard of the provisions of law, and as laid down by the supreme court. the tribunal, in my judgment has in this case, (1) come to patently inconsistent and contradictory conclusions by finding that privileges and conditions of service of officers applied to the respondent employee and the service conditions of clerks ceased to apply to him ..... error apparent on the face of the proceeding, e.g., when it is based on clear ignorance or disregard of the provisions of law. in other words, it is a patent error which can be corrected by certiorari but not a mere wrong decision. but it is kamath's case (c) again which points out the difficulty in the doctrine of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 1958 (HC)

National Textiles Vs. Premraj Ganpatraj

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-24-1958

Reported in : AIR1958Cal284,62CWN418

..... this appeal. what we have to consider here, however, is whether the order of the learned judge amounts to a judgment within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent. mr. mitra contended that even clause 15 could be of no assistance to the appellant, because by the order no question touching the merits of the controversy between the parties .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1958 (HC)

B.N. Elias and Co. Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-25-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Cal247

..... that the plaint as framed does not show that the court has jurisdiction to try this suit. the plaintiff has not obtained any leave under clause 12 of the letters patent. the plaintiff does not plead that the whole cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of this court. as a matter of fact the plaint nowhere pleads that any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1958 (HC)

Narendra Nath Dutt Vs. Jitendra Nath Dutt and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-27-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Cal62

..... contended that the order, although an order allowing an amendment of written statement, was a judgment and, therefore, an appeal from it would lie under clause 15 of the letters patent. mr. roy contended that no such question had been decided by the order appealed from in the present case and, indeed there had been no decision of anything at all ..... contention that the order, allowing the amendment in that case, was a judgment and what he said had a clear reference to the terms of clause 15 of the letters patent. when he said of the order before him that it did not either affect the rights of the other party or otherwise prejudice him, lie obviously meant that it did .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1958 (HC)

Morgan Walker and Co. Vs. Khardah Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Cal169,63CWN451

..... . set it aside and his order was affirmed on appeal on 9-6-1953. the trial court and the appellate court both held that the arbitrators had proceeded on a patent misconception of the dispute before them and assumed that they were to decide the rights of the parties under an amended contract, whereas whether the contract had been amended or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1958 (HC)

The Baranagore Jute Factory Co. Ltd. Vs. Hulaschand Rupchand

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1958Cal490,62CWN734

..... necessity of finding a rule for cases where after an award of the chamber has been set aside, the parties go back to the chamber to seek further arbitration is patent and since the rule can be applied to such cases with a slight stretching of its language, it should, in my opinion, be so applied. in actual practice, it has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1958 (HC)

Katihar Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Shri Lachminarayan Jute Manufacturing Co. ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1958Cal501

..... at page 44 of the paper-book. such were the nature and the number of the points raised by these statements and so multitudinous were the documents, many of them patently irrelevant, of which production was called for that the method which the respondent chose to adopt for conducting its defence can only he called vexatious. it had informed the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1958 (HC)

Administrator General of West Bengal Vs. Basudeb Mukherjee

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-18-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Cal174

..... the course of justice by writing to the trial judge or by writing to the chief justice requesting him to speak to the trial judge in the matter are so patent that i am astonished to see that a person advanced in years as barindra kumar chose is and holding an important and responsible position as the editor of a daily .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 1958 (HC)

Dulal Chandra Bhar and ors. Vs. Sukumar Banerjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-02-1958

Reported in : AIR1958Cal474,1958CriLJ1162,62CWN595

..... have shown no eagerness, either to allow the respondents to resume possession of the land or to return their goods. the manoeuvring for possession in which they have indulged are patent and many of them may even be wicked. but to find that they have been guilty of contempt of this court on such passive non-compliance with the implications of ..... is whether the appeal lies. it can be beld to lie only if it can be shown that the order appealed from is appealable under clause 15 of the letters patent and it can be shown to be appealable under that clause only if it is not an order of one of the excepted kinds and if it amounts to a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //