Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 1,392 results (0.049 seconds)

Jul 13 1951 (HC)

Dayabhai Poonambhai Patel Vs. the Regional Transport Authority and anr ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1951CriLJ1305

..... original as contrasted with appellate. this jurisdiction termed 'original' is not to be confused with 'original civil jurisdiction' mentioned in clause 12, letters patent. the last mentioned, jurisdiction can be exercised by its very nature within certain local limits. but the jurisdiction possessed by the high court in the ..... original jurisdiction with which the high courts of calcutta, bombay & madras were vested under section 9 of the high courts act & their respective letters patent is accepted, the hypothetical argument referred to in the opening portion of this para may require careful scrutiny.63. part 4: 'for enforcement of ..... at p. 722 of the report he pointedly drew attention to the fact that here is no mention of high prerogative writs in the letters patent. it would appear that according to his view, the power to issue such writs was an incident of the original jurisdiction with which the ..... the calcutta high court. after hearing the parties the rule was; made absolute. the high court held that under high courts act 1861 & amended letters patent of 1865 the original jurisdiction both territorial & personal of tile supreme court over british subjects & servants of the govt. was, on the abolition or ..... either when moved to do so by an application or of its own motion. jurisdiction exercised by the high court under ss. 22 & 26 of patents & designs act (1911) or under the indian succession act in the matter of grant of probates are other examples.30. besides these jurisdictions this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 1959 (HC)

Jabalpur Electric Supply Company Ltd. Vs. State Industrial Court and o ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1959)IILLJ74MP

..... of the medical appeal tribunal was open to certiorari on an error of law on face of the decision. similarly in e.m. patents appeal tribunal (1957) 1 all e.r. 227 certiorari was issued to the patents appeal tribunal which also was an expert investigating body. here the jurisdiction of the state industrial court depended upon the determination of the question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1959 (HC)

SurajdIn Laxmanlal Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960MP129

..... to grantor or lessor, on the working of the property leased, or otherwise on the profits of the grant or lease. the word is especially used in reference to mines, patents and copyrights.'it, therefore, appears that royalties are paymentswhich the government may demand for the appropriation of minerals, timber or other property belonging to the government. two important features of ..... a cess.7. in wharton's law lexicon (fourteenth edition) the word 'royalty' has been explained as 'payment to a patentee by agreement on every article made according to his patent; or to an author by a publisher on every copy of his hook sold; or to the owner of minerals for the right of working the same on every ton .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1960 (HC)

Damodar Sharma and anr. Vs. Nandram Deviram

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960MP345

..... its being passed. you must look to the mischief which had to be cured as well as to the cure provided.'in eastman photographic material co. v. comptroller general of patents, 1898 ac 571 (576), ear] of halsbury said:'my lords, it appears to me that to construe the statute in question, it is not only legitimate but highly convenient to ..... division bench'. that reference was considered by the division bench of shinde c.j. and dixit j. (as my lord then was), while deciding the special appeal (say roughly. letters patent 'appeal) in the case of madh b lj 1954 hcr 274. the division bench took a broader view. dissenting from the view taken in laduram's case, madh b lj .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 1961 (HC)

Punjab Soap Works Vs. Hindusthan Liver Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1962MP356; 1962MPLJ240

..... and, therefore, the order refusing tostay the suit under section 10 c. p. c. is a 'judgment' withinthe meaning of clause 15 letters patent. this case isthus distinguishable on the ground that the orders inthat case went to the root of the suit and decided amatter of controversy between ..... cannot be taken into account in determining whether an order granting or refusing a temporary injunction is a 'judgment' appealable under clause 10 of the letters patent. here it may be pointed out that the statement of shrlvastava j. in the allahabad case that in manohar's case, ilr (1952) nag 471 ..... observation supporting the view that an order granting or refusing an interim injunction is a 'judgment' within the meaning of clause 10 of the letters patent.the supreme court expressly refrained from framing an exhaustive definition of the word 'judgment.' that being so, the fact that the supreme court pointedly referred ..... court and the privy council. hidayatullah j. (as he then was) expressed his view about the term judgment' as used in the letters patent thus-'a judgment means a decision in an action whether final, preliminary or interlocutory which decides either wholly or partially, but conclusively in so far ..... raised by the respondent must be upheld. the question whether the order of the learned single judge is appealable under clause 10 of the letters patent depends on whether it is a 'judgment1 within the meaning of that clause. various high courts have considered, and expressed divergent views on, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 1968 (HC)

New Precision (India) Pvt. Ltd., Dewas Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1969MP68

..... developed in the swiss company's laboratories and to communicate the results of its research work, and also granted to the assesses full and sole right and licence under the patent listed in the agreement to make use, exercise and vend the inventions specified therein in india. in consideration of the right to receive scientific and technical assistance, the assessee agreed ..... . as pointed out by the supreme court, the assessee ciba of india ltd. did not under the agreement become entitled exclusively, even for the period of the agreement, to the patents and trade marks of the swiss company; it had merely access to the technical knowledge and experience in the pharmaceutical field which the swiss company commanded; by making that technical .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 1968 (HC)

New Precision (India) Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [1969]72ITR657(MP); 1969MPLJ27

..... developed in the swiss company's laboratories, and to communicate the results of its research work, and also granted to the assessee full and sole right and licence under the patent listed in the agreement to make use, exercise and vend the inventions specified therein in india. in consideration of the right to receive scientific and technical assistance, the assessee agreed ..... . as pointed out by the supreme court, the assessee, ciba of india ltd., did not, under the agreement become entitled exclusively, even for the period of the agreement, to the patents and trade marks of the swiss company ; it had merely access to the technical knowledge and experience in the pharmaceutical field which the swiss company commanded; by making that technical .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1976 (HC)

Abdul Taiyab Abbasbhai Malik and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1977MP116; 1977MPLJ227

..... and the seat and it is because of this that great emphasis was laid by learned counsel for the petitioners on the language used in the letters patent, namely, '...... have thought fit to erect and establish.' emphasis was laid on the phrase 'erect', probably to emphasize the construction of the building where ..... council of the central provinces, subject to the control of the governor general in council, convenient that the jurisdiction and power by these our letters patent, or by or under the government of india act, vested in the high court of judicature at nagpur should be exercised in any place ..... in support thereof appear to be based on a misapprehension of the legal position.20. when the nagpur high court was constituted under the letters patent, it was empowered under clause 27 to make rules in regard to all cases which it was competent to try. similarly, under sections 106 ..... framed certain rules in exercise of its powers under article 225 of the constitution read with clause 27 of the letters patent for petitions under article 226 of the constitution by notification no. 8224, dated 25th september 1951 and these rules alone regulate the proceedings of ..... article 226 of the constitution is an extraordinary jurisdiction and, therefore, no rules regulating the exercise of this jurisdiction could be framed under the letters patent or the relevant provisions of the government of india act, 1915 or 1935.18. it was further pointed out that the nagpur high court had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1978 (HC)

Shrichand Vs. Tejinder Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1979MP76

..... 'judgment' given by rangoon and nagpur high courts. the supreme court, therefore, held that a judgment within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent would have to satisfy two tests. first, the judgment must be the finalpronouncement which puts an end to the proceeding so far as the court dealing ..... deb, air 1953 sc 198 wherein it was held that transfer of a suit from one court to high court under clause 13 of the letters patent (calcutta) is not a judgment within the meaning of clause 15. in that case, the supreme court noticed the divergent views of the different high ..... then was) in manohar v. baliram, air 1952 nag 357 (fb) differed with the rangoon view andopined that a judgment in clause 10 of the letters patent means a decision in an action whether final, preliminary or interlocutory which decides either wholly or partially, but conclusively in so far as the court is concerned, ..... an application, which is nothing more than a step towards obtaining a final adjudication in the suit, is not a judgment within the meaning of the letters patent'.however, there are divergent views of the other high courts. a full bench of the rangoon high court in dayabhai v. murugappa chettyar, air 1935 ..... the appeal is not competent as the impugned order of the learned single judge is not judgment within the meaning of clause 10 of the letters patent. this apart, the learned single judge in the first appeal was entitled to reconsider the whole evidence and come to a different conclusion for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1980 (HC)

Manoharsingh and anr. Vs. Caltex Oil Refining (India) Ltd., Bombay and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1981MP123; 1981MPLJ202

..... . explanation-- the undertaking of coril referred to above shall be deemed to include all assets, rights, leases, tenancies, powers, authorities and privileges, trade marks, trade names, patent rights and licences for the use of patents and all property, movable and immovable, tangible or intangible (including cash and bank balances), reserve funds, book debts, outstandings, reserves, balances on revenue accounts, investments and all .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //