Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: madhya pradesh Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 19 results (0.058 seconds)

Jan 17 1958 (HC)

The Bilaspur Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pr ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-17-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP77

..... that the subordinate police officers were dishonest and privy to the theft of the box. the investigation by the police did not result in any such discovery. negligence, however, was patent.17. we accordingly hold that in the case of a master and servant, where the master is the bailee, and the servant is either dishonest or negligent, the master must .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1958 (HC)

Shriniwas Vs. Rukmini Raman Pratap Singh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-24-1958

Reported in : AIR1958MP243

..... we have quoted above. 11. a large number of authorities was cited before us, mainly from the election tribunal cases, to which we need not refer here. it is, quite patent that the facts of one election petition are not always the facts of another election petition, and even in the same kind of election petitions there may be shades and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1958 (HC)

Kanhayyalal Shivasahay Sharma Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-1958

Reported in : AIR1958MP211; [1958]9STC503(MP)

..... acts could be relied upon by the appellate authorities of the department. the contention of the petitioner is that on the date on which the assessment was made it was patently beyond time because the act came into force on 23-5-1947, and even three calendar years calculated from that date would expire in 1950 and not in 1952. he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1958 (HC)

Gauri Shankar Vs. Firm Dulichand Laxmi Narayan

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP188

..... appeal under section 47 of the civil procedure code and shall dispose it of accordingly, so that the party aggrieved would have a right of appeal, under clause 10 of the letters patent, as a matter of right, on the authority of madhukar trimbaklal v. sati godawari upasani maharaj, ilr (1940) nag 141: (air 1940 nag 39) (fb).there is authority for this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 07 1958 (HC)

Her Highness Maharani Vijaya Raje ScIndia Vs. Motilal Jugal Kishore

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-07-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP109

..... is only if the section be considered as mandatory that the election of the appellant can be declared void under section 100 of the act, because, if directory, there is patently a substantial compliance with it. 16. here we come to another branch of the argument as to whether a breach of section 37 by the candidate, whose notice of withdrawal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1958 (HC)

Bhojraj Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-23-1958

Reported in : AIR1958MP286

..... by the provincial government in this behalf' qualify not only civiljudge, but also district judge and additional district judge. the case decided by eao, j, was reversed in a letters patent appeal reported in dr, g. v. pandit v. dr. p. v. deshmukh, ilr (1952) nag 352: (air 1952 nag 283) (b), but not on this point. in madan lal v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1958 (HC)

inayatullah Khan Vs. Diwanchand Mahajan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP58

..... was manoeuvring for his success. that mahajan entertained this suspicion is trueenough and there are certain actions on which the conduct of sardar amarjit singh does not stand scrutiny, a patent fact in this connection is the number of telephonic conversations he had with inayatullah, one of the candidates. the trunk telephone bills have been produced to show that inayatullah and ..... were similarly employed for carrying voters. here again, we find it difficult to believe that tongas would have been hired in this manner and their use would have been so patent. needless to say that there is no corroboration of the evidence of mano-harlal, nor was any protest registered at the time with the presiding officer whose report does not ..... supreme court, and we think that the matter must rest there. we cannot, however, help saying that this breach on the part of the returning officer was of a very patent nature and one which could easily have been avoided by him by being more circumspect in examining the ruling of the supreme court, which was indisputably before him and which ..... candidates on top and underneath are entered votes which they have received as a result of the count of all the five stations. the corrections in this form are quite patent. they have been made in the column of inayatullah, where quite apparently, the figure 103 which was entered first has been scored out and the figure 284 is written-as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1958 (HC)

Maursinha Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-1958

Reported in : AIR1958MP397

..... , 1922, their lordships were obviously considering the same from the point as to whether there was or there was not an error apparent on the face of the record. such patent error did appear to their lordships on the face of the record having regard to the charges and their explanation rendered by the kareli municipality.the error amounted to one ..... do is to demolish the order which, according to its view, is without jurisdiction or palpably erroneous. it cannot substitute its own view for those of the inferior tribunal. the patent error must be an error of law revealed on the face of the order; vide t. c. basappa v. t. nagaupa, air 1954 sc 440 (l).39. with these principles .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1958 (HC)

K.L. Chaturvedi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-1958

Reported in : 1960CriLJ1614

..... into force, the director of health services by his memorandum, dated 21st february 1957, informed the petitioner in answer to his letter dated 13th january, 1957 that in case of patent and proprietary medicines true formulae will have to be disclosed (annexure 4). further correspondence followed, when the aforesaid direction was reiterated: (annexures 5 and 7). in issuing the certificate ..... the petitioner states he had no grievance. he had disclosed the true formula to the central drugs laboratory and obtained the registration number cdl/1059 with respect to his patent and proprietary medicine 'germs killer'. he had also obtained a licence as required by the act for file manufacture and sale of his proprietary medicine and was manufacturing and ..... and detailed receipt of the ingredients, it indicates correctly all the potent or poisonous substances contained therein together with an approximate statement of the composition of the medicine.the expression 'patent or proprietary medicine' was defined in section 3 (d) to mean:a drug which is a remedy or prescription prepared for internal or external use of human beings or ..... act, 1940, as amended by the drugs (amendment) act, 1955, was unconstitutional and void, as it unreasonably restricted the fundamental right of the petitioner to manufacture and sell his patent' and proprietary medicine, 'germs killer' without disclosing on the carton or label of the drugs its true formula or list of ingredients.2. the relevant facts may shortly be .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 1958 (HC)

Chakrapani Jagannath Prasad Vs. Chandoo Sahadeo and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-06-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP397

..... deposition to show that he came across chandoo canvassing in any area or saw him canvassing between the 22nd february and the 4th march. his interest in the issue is patent enough, and in view of this we do not think that he can be relied upon.31. surya prasad (p. w. 5), the next witness, is even more vitally interested .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //