Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: madhya pradesh Year: 1958 Page 2 of about 19 results (0.061 seconds)

May 14 1958 (HC)

Ramlal Singh and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-14-1958

Reported in : AIR1958MP380; 1958CriLJ1402

..... fact that the discretion must be exercised by reference to all the circumstances of each particular case, and, allowance must be made when the motive for uttering a falsehood is patent on the face of it. in the present case, keshar singh p. w. 2, was belaboured by the accused; he became unconscious as a result o the injuries and continued ..... under section 302 read with section 149 of the indian penal code on a misreading of the evidence on record. this reference is governed by clause 26 of the letters patent, under which i am entitled to decide only the point of difference between the learned judges and not any point on which they have agreed. therefore, only the question of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 1958 (HC)

Qamarali Wahid Ali Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-08-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP46

..... , the prerogative powers werenot exercised on account of the long delay. more-over this court in exercise of prerogative powers couldnot interfere with a pre-constitution matter. leave forfiling letters patent appeal under clause 10 is refused.

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 1958 (HC)

Sheoramprasad Ram Narayanlal Bania Vs. Gopalprasad Parmeshwardayal Shu ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-14-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP102

..... . this does not mean, as was contended, that defendant 1 was denied all share of the profits and properties of the partnership. the award, therefore, is not shown to be patently partial to the plaintiff and cannot be assailed on that ground. 28. the result is that the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1958 (HC)

Syed Qamarali Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-18-1958

Reported in : (1959)ILLJ47MP

..... powers were not exercised on account of the long delay. moreover this court, in exercise of prerogative powers, could not interfere with a pre-constitution matter. leave for filing letters patent appeal under clause 10 is refused.

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 1958 (HC)

Munni Bai and anr. Vs. Abdul Gani

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-28-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP225

g.p. bhutt, j.1. this is a letters patent appeal against the judgment in second appeal no. 227 of 1954 decided by deo j.2. the appellants were mortgagees in possession of a house situate at gobra-nawapara rajim, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 1958 (HC)

Habib Miyan Vs. Mahemud Mir

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP221

m. hidayatullah, c.j.1. this appeal under the letters patent is against the judgment of kotval j, in second appeal no. 371 of 1950 dated 16th march 1956 and with the leave of the learned single judge.2. the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1958 (HC)

Masalkhan S/O Kalandar Khan Vs. Custodian of Evacuee Property and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-13-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP256

p.k. tare, j. 1. this appeal is directed against the order of naik j. dated 20-7-1956 passed in miscellaneous petition no. 224 of 1956, refusing to issue a writ of certiorari under article 226 of the constitution of india against the orders of the authorities acting tinder the administration of evacuee property act (xxxi of 1950).2. this case has had a chequered history. the facts as established from the record are as follows :one abdul gafoor khan, a fruit merchant of bilaspur in madhya pradesh, went to village pir piyai (west pakistan) in september, 1948 along with his wife, children and his parents. on 15-1-1949, abdul gafoor applied from village pir piyai for permission to come to india. a non-objection certificate dated 1-2-1949 was issued granting him the necessary permission. he returned to india on the said permit and again applied on 2-8-1949 for a permit to visit pir piyai. a temporary permit dated 26-8-1949 was granted to him, which was valid upto 25-8-1950. he overstayed there and after the expiry of the period of the permit applied to the union government for permission to return to india. but by an order dated 24-7-1951, he was refused permission. there is nothing on record to indicate that he made any subsequent attempts to return to india.3. in the year 1952, proceedings were started for declaring ashraf khan, father of abdul cafoor khan, an evacuee vide evacuee property case no.16-33/7 of 1951-52. in the course of the proceedings not only ashraf khan, but .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 1958 (HC)

Nathanlal Vs. State Industrial Court and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-25-1958

Reported in : (1960)ILLJ786MP

k.l. pandey, j.1. this is a letters patent appeal directed against the order of bhatt, j., dated 8 october 1957, by which the appellant's petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution was dismissed.2. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 1958 (HC)

Vishnu Ganesh Namjoshi Vs. Laxminarayan

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP293

v.r. newasker, j.1. this second appeal arises out of plaintiff's suit for ejectment and arrears of rent.2. the facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows:3. plaintiff vishnu ganesh namjoshi sued defendant laxminarain on the allegations that the latter had taken shop premises consisting of two rooms in his house abutting on jail road, indore at rs. 75/- p. m. from 20-4-1949 but that he fell is arrears and failed to pay the same in spite of notice as required by law and that on that account his tenancy was terminated by means of a lawful notice to quit.4. the defendant by his written statement contended that he had deposited with the plaintiff rs. 225/- being the rent for three months in advance; that although the contractual rent was rs. 75/-per month, the fair rent was determined at his instance by the rent controller at rs. 22/8/- pet month; that on receipt of plaintiff's notice dated 15-10-1953 he sent to the plaintiff the amount to cover up entire arrears after taking into account the aforesaid deposit amount of rs. 225/- minus rs. 67/8; as the advance rent for three months at rs. 22/8/; that later on receipt of a second notice dated 5-12-1953 he sent rs. 45/- by money order as two months rent upto 18-1-1954 which the plaintiff refused and that the notice to quit was not lawful.5. the trial court held that the defendant had failed to pay the arrears in spite of notice of demand and that there was lawful termination of his tenancy by means of a valid notice to quit. he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //