Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 52 results (0.020 seconds)

Jan 04 2001 (HC)

Des Raj Vs. Surjit Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-04-2001

Reported in : AIR2001P& H146

..... in fao no. 2612 of 1998 preferred by appellant des raj. the orders aforesaid have been challenged by appellant des raj in this appeal under clause-x of the letters patent.2. brief facts giving rise to this appeal reveal that the government issued notification for holding election to gram panchayats. as per notification, depending upon number of voters, some posts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2001 (HC)

RohIn Kaushal Vs. Aalok Jagga

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-05-2001

Reported in : AIR2001P& H213

n.k. sodhi, j.1. this order will dispose of four letters patent appeals 1689, 1699, 1709 and 1710 of 2000 all of which are directed against the judgment dated 10.11.2000 passed by the learned single judge disposing of four writ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2001 (HC)

Shimla Rani Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-10-2001

Reported in : I(2001)DMC784

orderk.s. garewal, j. 1. the petitioner is a 65 years old woman. without adverting to the merits or demerits of the petition, the age of the petitioner is sufficient ground to release her on bail. 2. bail to the satisfaction of the cjm/trial court, ferozepur. 3. petition allowed.

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2001 (HC)

Dharambir Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-16-2001

Reported in : AIR2001P& H194

a.s. gill, j.1. the petitioner claiming himself to be having been duty elected sarpanch of gram panchayat munimpur tehsil and district jhajjat, in the !ast panchayat election, seeks issuance of a writ under articles 226/227 of the constitution of india, directing the respondents to administer him the oath of office of the sarpanch, gram panchayat, munimpur. forthwith and for restraining the respondents from handing over the charge of the gram panchayat in the meantime to any panch of the gram panchayat, munimpur. the case of the petitioner is that he contested the election of sarpanch of the gram panchayat and was duly declared elected after having secured the highest number of valid votes in the election held on march, 2000. the returning officer prepared a report about hiselec-tion and forwarded the same to the block development and panchayat officer for onward transmission to the concerned authorities. the result of the elections were reported in the press and published in dainik tribune dated 15.3,2000 and the name of the petitioner having been elected as sarpanch of the panchayat, appeared in para 3 of the news item, copy annexure p-2 with the petition.2. the state government organised oath ceremony function on 26.4.2000 at jind and the chief minister of haryana administered oath to the newly elected sar-panches and panches of the respective villages. however, the petitioner was not administered oath. he made representation but was not given due consideration. in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2001 (HC)

Richa Sharma @ Happy Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-2001

Reported in : I(2001)DMC712

s.s. nijjar, j.1. this petition under section 482 cr.p.c. seeks quashing of the fir no. 229, dated 2.12.1998, under sections 498a, 406 and 506 i pc, registered at police station, beas, district amritsar.2. the petitioner is stated to be the un-married sister of the husband of the complainant. the birth certificate has been attached with this petition which shows that the petitioner was born on 20.2.1978. at the very outset, the impression given is that the petitioner has been residing throughout in chandigarh. in support of this statement of fact, the petitioner has attached certificate, annexure, p-2, issued by the central board of secondary education, delhi, showing that she appeared in all india senior school certificate examination i.e. 10+2, in the year 1995. this certificate shows that the petitioner appeared as a student of government girls model senior secondary school, sector 40, chandigarh. it is also the case of the petitioner that the marriage between her brother and the complainant was solemnised on 24.7.1995. it is stated that the petitioner was studying at chandigarh and was living alongwith her parents at chandigarh. her brother was posted in shimla even before the marriage. after marriage, he took his wife away to shimla. it is categorically stated in paragraph 5 of the petition that she has been studying and living at chandigarh all the time. paragraph 5 of the petition is reproduced hereun-der for ready reference :-'5. the petitioner has been studying and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2001 (HC)

Popular Engineering Co. Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-31-2001

Reported in : (2001)168CTR(P& H)55; [2001]248ITR577(P& H)

..... powers vested in it under section 254(2), the tribunal cannot review or revise an order made under section 254(1) though it may amend such order for rectifying a patent mistake which may have crept in, in such order, on account of non-consideration of an important piece of evidence or plea raised by the aggrieved party. the absence of ..... on findings of law or on findings of facts. the supreme court in t.s. balaram's case : [1971]82itr50(sc) had asserted that it must be an obvious and patent mistake that calls for rectification and not something where there may be two conceivable opinions or on a debatable point of law and the latter would not amount to a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2001 (HC)

M/S. Shanti Kunj Investment (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. U.T. Administration, Chand ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-02-2001

Reported in : AIR2001P& H309

orderjawahar lal gupta, j.1. the petitioners in these seven cases are the allottees of different commercial sites. they allege that the chandigarh administration has failed to provide basic amenities/facililies for theuse and occupation of the sites sold to them. they complain that the administration has failed to administer. it is guilty of mal-administration. yet, it is arbi-trarily charging ground rent and interest. it is even resorting to the resumption of sites. on these premises, the petitioners pray for the intervention of this court so as to prevent the administration from charging interest and ground rent. the factual position as relevant for the decision of these cases may be briefly noticed.cwp no. 9481/99 2. on february 12, 1989, the chandigarh administration auctioned godown site no. 290, sector 26, chandigarh. the petitioner alongwith his two brothers gave a bid for a premium of rs. 22,10,000/-. it was accepted. after deposit of 25% of the bid money viz. rs. 5,52,500/- the letter of allotment was issued to the petitioner on march 16, 1989. the site was given to the petitioner for 99 years on lease-hold basis. under the terms of allotment, the petitioner had to pay the amount alongwith interest at the rate of 7% per annum in three equal yearly instalments of rs. 6,31,590/-. these payments had to commence at the expiry of one year from the date of auction. besides that, the allottees had also to pay annual ground rental therate of rs. 55,250/- for the first 33 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2001 (HC)

Ram Chander Vs. Anguri Devi

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-02-2001

Reported in : I(2002)DMC193

r. l. anand, j.1. reconciliation efforts made but not succeeded.2. this is a husband's appeal and has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 25.10.1999, passed by the court of additional district judge, kaithal, who, dismissed the petition under section 13 of the hindu marriage act filed by shri ram chander against his wife anguri devi.3. it has been inter alia pleaded by the appellant that his marriage with the respondent took place on 6.3.1968. the parties to the marriage co-habited with each other and a female child was born in the year 1983 i.e. after 15 years of the marriage. it is the common case of the parties that they co- habited with each other as husband and wife for 18 years. the petitioner is seeking the divorce by alleging that the behaviour of the respondent became disrespectful, non-co-operative, rude and offensive. since the solemnisation of the marriage, she used to treat the petitioner with cruelty and she also used to hurl abuses. respondent was in the habit of leaving the matrimonial home without the consent of the appellant and against his wishes. after 18 years of the marriage, respondent left the matrimonial home with the minor child. she filed a petition under section 125 cr.p.c. she further filed a criminal case under sections 406/498a i.p.c. in the year 1994 against the petitioner and his family members and all these acts committed on the part of the respondent are the acts of cruelty. it was further pleaded by the petitioner-appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2001 (HC)

Harpal Singh Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-15-2001

Reported in : AIR2001P& H328

jawahar lal gupta, j.1. these five writ petitions raise a common issue - is the action of the chief administrator in refusing to accept the bid arbitrary counsel for the parties have referred to the facts in cwp no. 14199 of 2000. these may be briefly noticed.2. the haryana urban development authority published a notice indicating its intention to sell certain commercial plots by open auction. the auction was fixed for may 30, 2000. a reserve price of rs. 7.55lacs had been fixed for plot no. 42, sector 21-c, faridabad. the petitioners participated in the auction. they gave the bid of rs. 16.40 lacs. 10% of the amount viz. 1.64 lacs were deposited at the spot. when the petitioners did not get a letter of allotment, they served a legal notice on the respondents on july 31, 2000. this was followed by a suit in the court of civil judge (jr. division), faridabad. however, the suit was withdrawn. vide letter dated august 24, 2000, the petitioners were informed that their bid had not been accepted by the competent authority. a copy of this communication has been produced as annexure p.7 with the writ petition. aggrieved by the action, the petitioners have approached this court through the present writ petition. it is alleged that the action of the authority is arbitrary and unfair. there was no material on the basis of which the authority could have come to the conclusion that the offer made by the petitioners should be rejected. consequently, the petitioners pray that the impugned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2001 (HC)

Mam Kaur Vs. Ram Sarup

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-01-2001

Reported in : II(2001)DMC255

orderr.l. anand, j.1. smt. mam kaur, appellant (wife) has filed the present appeal and it has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 16.3.1998 passed by addl. district judge, kumkshetra, who dismissed her petition under section 13 of the hindu marriage act (hereinafter referred 10 as 'the act')2. in her petition under section 13 of the act smt. mam kaur sought a decree of divorce by inter alia alleging that her marriage with respondent no. 1 was performed in march, 1985 according to hindu rites and ceremonies in village bargat tehsil thanesar, district kurukshetra. out of this wedlock no child was bom. according to the petitioner, respondent no. 1 is a greedy person and he wanted to usurp the land owned by her and her mother and that he had been beating them. he even tried to administer poison to the petitioner. it is further averred by the petitioner/appellant that respondent no. 1 has contracted second marriage with respondent no. 2, parveen, who is being kept by respondent no. 1, in his house as wife and out of this illegal wedlock a female child namely pooja was born on 5.9.1994. so much so, respondent no. 2 is again pregnant from the loins of respondent no. 1, and in this manner the respondent no. 1 is living in adultery with respondent no. 1 and on this ground also she is entitled to a decree of divorce. it is also the case of the petitioner that since respondent no. 1 is living in adultery with respondent no. 2, therefore, respondent no. 1 has committed an .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //