Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.007 seconds)

Mar 18 1986 (HC)

R.S.E.B., Vidyut Bhawan Vs. the Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd., New Delh ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-18-1986

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN191

..... its jurisdiction or the case is one in which the court ought to have exercised the jurisdiction or further that in exercising the jurisdiction the court has acted illegally in patent breach of some provision of law or with material irregularity by committing error of procedure. the question in the instant case about entertaining the revision is regarding admission of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1986 (HC)

Mst. Bano Alias Chidi Bano and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-23-1986

Reported in : 1986WLN(UC)701

..... girl of tender age of about 14-16 years was obviously for dancing so that she can serve the customers for prostitution.12. shri tibrewal, confronted with the above obvious, patent and clear evidence, submitted that the girl was not proved to be below 18 years of age. here again the evidence that she was below 18 years, is clinching and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 1986 (HC)

Bhagwan Singh Vs. Hindustan Zinc Limited and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-08-1986

Reported in : 1986WLN(UC)198

..... m.p. irrigation and karamchari sangh v. state of m.p. and anr. : (1985)illj519sc observed as under:while conceding a very limited jurisdiction to the state government to examine patent frivolousness of the demands it is to be understood as a rule that adjudication of demands made by workmen should be left to the tribunal to decide. section 10 permits .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1986 (HC)

Gopal Krishna S/O Pana Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-23-1986

Reported in : 1986(2)WLN376

..... showing co-operation, by not producing the case diary even after specific direction of this court in the past, on the number of times, i have noticed this type of patent behaviour of the public prosecutors before the court; and they never produce the case diaries in time before the court. this is nothing but clear disobedience of the orders of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 1986 (HC)

Chandra Prakash and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-25-1986

Reported in : 1986(2)WLN710

..... investigating officer ought to have been accepted by the learned special judge. this was in a case where cognizance should not have been taken by the court when there was patent breach of the procedure laid down for obtaining the samples.6. the result of the aforesaid discussions is that this application is allowed, order, dated april 10, 1985 taking cognizance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1986 (HC)

Santosh Rani and anr. and the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sheela ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-03-1986

Reported in : I(1987)ACC134

..... it and has cancelled the policy its liability would continue inspite of the transfer.22. since the principles of law on this branch of insurance company's liability are very patent i would not like to deal them in details. it would be suffice to mention that the liability would subsist irrespective of the transfer, since it is an admitted that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 1986 (HC)

Siyaram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-17-1986

Reported in : 1987WLN(UC)633

..... dated 21-1-1981 passed by the sdm amber district jaipur. these two orders, one of the civil court and another of a criminal court makes it very clear and patent that the possession and cultivation on the land in dispute contained in khasra no. 173, motho-ka-bas, thana-amber was of siya ram and others at the relevant time .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 1986 (HC)

Ganpati Printing Works Through Its Partner Nathur Ram Vs. E.S.i. Corpo ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-19-1986

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN356

..... otherwise. it means that the extension of this provision of the act would be to those establishments which were not covered earlier by clause (iv). it is to make this patent and clear that notification expressly mentioned exclusion of them. this exclusion is not intended to be total exclusion but is meant to clarify the position that by virtue of this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 1986 (HC)

University of Jodhpur Vs. Alok Goyal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-24-1986

Reported in : 1986WLN(UC)513

ashok kumar mathur, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the order of a learned single judge of this court dated 7-3-1986.2. the petitioner look admission in the b.e. course on october .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 1986 (HC)

E.S.i. Corporation Vs. Shri Ram Chemical Industries

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-29-1986

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN610

..... , but may be any 'additional remuneration' out side the contract of employment.12. i am considering a case where the question of payment of life insurance corporation premium subsidee is patently outside the terms of contract of employment express or implied and therefore in that clause it can never come. however, since the hon'ble supreme court by this latest judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //