Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 108 results (0.082 seconds)

Jan 15 2004 (SC)

The State of West Bengal Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(SC)219; [2004]266ITR721(SC); JT2004(1)SC375; 2004(1)SCALE425; (2004)10SCC201

..... to mean, "land ofwhatever description ... and includes all benefits to arise out of land".lands held for carrying on mining operations would be taken in by the saiddefinition. it is patently clear that 'minerals', which are benefitsarising out of land, will be roped in within the purview of the levy undersection 3(1) read with section 2(c) of the act ..... a grantor or lessor, on the working of the property leased, or otherwise on the profits of the grant of lease. the word is especially used in reference to mines/ patents and copyrights."prem's judicial dictionary (1992, vol. 2, page 1458) - "royalties are payments which the government may demand for the appropriation of minerals, timber or other property belonging to ..... the demised mineral worked within a specified period"wharton's law lexicon (fourteenth edition, page 893) - "royalty, payment to a patentee by agreement on every article made according to his patent; or to an author by a publisher on every copy of his book sold; or to the owner of minerals for the right of working the same on every ton ..... , that part of the reddendum which is variable, and depends upon the quantity of minerals gotten or the agreed payment to a patentee on every article made according to the patent. rights or privileges for which remuneration is payable in the form of a royalty"words and phrases, legally defined (third edition, 1990, vol.4, page 112) - "a royalty, in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2004 (SC)

M.P. Vidyut Karamchari Sangh Vs. M.P. Electricity Board

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-2004

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR670]; JT2004(3)SC423; (2004)IILLJ470SC; 2004(3)SCALE383; (2004)9SCC755; 2004(2)SLJ414(SC); (2004)2UPLBEC1313

..... as writ petition no. 7255 of 2000. the said writ petition was dismissed by a learned single judge of the high court where against the appellant herein preferred a letters patent appeal marked as letters patents appeal no. 34 of 2001. by reason of the impugned judgment dated 11.9.2001, the division bench dismissed the said appeal.high court

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2004 (SC)

P.S. Sathappan (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC5152; 2004(5)CTC209; JT2004(8)SC464; (2005)1MLJ105(SC); RLW2005(1)SC19; 2004(8)SCALE601; (2004)11SCC672

..... 1 of the cpc.c) there is no inconsistency between section 104 read with order 43 rule 1 and the appeals under letters patent, as letters patent in any way does not exclude or override the application under section 104 read with order 43 rule 1 which shows that these ..... in the appeal against the ultimate decree in terms of section 105 thereof.nature and extent of power of the high court under letters patent :36. letters patent is a special statue but in the event of a conflict, as would appear from the discussions made hereinafter, the provisions of the ..... court exercising appellate jurisdiction, provided the judgment appealed against is not one which was preferred against an appellate order, meaning thereby that no letters patent appeal would lie against an order passed by a single judge in second appeal, or an order passed in revisional jurisdiction, the latter part ..... 1988]2scr1043 and dipak chandra ruhidas v. chandan kumar sarkar, : air2003sc3701 .52. even in the aforementioned cases also, it has been held that a letters patent appeal may be barred by implication.appeal under special statute:53. the question, however, may be different when an appeal is provided for under a special ..... election petition expressly provided under section 116a of the representation of the people act, it will be evident that a right of appeal under the letters patent had been held to have been taken away by necessary implication. (see n.p. ponnuswami v. returning officer. namakkal constituency and ors. 1952 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2004 (SC)

Ajay Gandhi and anr. Vs. B. Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC1391; (2004)186CTR(SC)506; 2004(95)ECC13; 2004(167)ELT257(SC); [2004]265ITR451(SC); JT2004(1)SC211; 2004(1)SCALE84; (2004)2SCC120; 2004(2)SLJ160(SC)

..... parte beckwith (1996) 1 all e.r. 129, the house of lords has held that a departmental circular is entitled, to respect. it can only be ignored when it is patently wrong: the said principle has also been followed in indian metals and ferro alloys ltd. vs. collector of central excise : 1991ecr11(sc) ; keshavji ravji and co. v. commissioner of income .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2004 (SC)

Ajay Gandhi Vs. B. Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2004

Reported in : [2004]134TAXMAN537(SC)

..... parte, beckwith (1996) 1 all e.r. 129, the house of lords has held that a departmental circular is entitled to respect. it can only be ignored when it is patently wrong. the said principle has also been followed in indian metals & ferro alloys ltd. v. cce : 1991ecr11(sc) ; keshavji ravji & co. v. cit : [1990]183itr1(sc) , raymond synthetics ltd. v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2004 (SC)

Jamshed Hormusji Wadia Vs. Board of Trustees, Port of Mumbai and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-13-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC1815; 2004(176)ELT24(SC); JT2004(1)SC232; 2004(1)SCALE341; (2004)3SCC214

..... interveners with regard to the 'compromise proposals' that are submitted by the port trust and consider the same on merits. it will be open to the respondents in the letters patent appeals before the high court as well as the interveners to agitate the points which were agitated before the learned single judge and which have been decided against them by ..... the learned single judge. if any of the appellants in these appeals had not intervened before the high court in letters patent appeals still will be open to him to move the high court for intervention.'(emphasis supplied)8. the matter reached back and has been disposed of afresh vide the impugned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (SC)

Metroark Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : 2004(92)ECC489; 2004(164)ELT225(SC); (2004)12SCC505

..... ) ...... (b) ...... (c) medicaments (heading no. 30.03)' 4.1.5 heading no. 30.03 & sub-heading no. 3003.20 30.03 medicaments (including veterinary medicaments). 3003.20 medicaments (other than patent or proprietary) nilother than those which are exclusively used in ayurvedic,unani, siddha, homeopathic or bio-chemic systems. 4.1.6 note 2(i) to chapter 30 2. for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 2004 (SC)

Basheer @ N.P. Basheer Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-09-2004

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)648; 2004CriLJ1418; 2004(92)ECC33; JT2004(2)SC299; 2004(2)KLT39(SC); 2004(2)SCALE415; (2004)3SCC609

..... connection to the object sought to be achieved. article 14 does not insist upon classification, which is scientifically perfect or logically complete. a classification would be justified unless it is patently arbitrary. if there is equality and uniformity in each group, the law will not become discriminatory, though due to some fortuitous circumstance arising out of (sic) peculiar situation some included .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2004 (SC)

K. Kunhambu Vs. Smt. Chandramma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-10-2004

Reported in : (SCSuppl)2004(3)CHN5; JT2004(3)SC255b; 2004(6)KarLJ179; 2004(2)SCALE363; (2004)9SCC174

..... on behalf of the appellant. per contra, shri v. r. reddy, learned senior counsel appearing for the 1st respondent, contesting respondent, with equal force urged that having regard to the patent mistakes committed by the authorities below in the matter of interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions and total misdirection and misconception of vital and relevant facts, the high court was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2004 (SC)

Punam Devi and anr. Vs. Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Lt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-12-2004

Reported in : I(2004)ACC720; 2004ACJ785; AIR2004SC1742; 2004(2)AWC1518(SC); 2004(1)BLJR787; (SCSuppl)2004(4)CHN9; [2004]120CompCas131(SC); 2004(2)CTC79; [2004(2)JCR95(SC)]; JT2004(3)SC33

..... judge of the high court dismissed the appeal on the ground that the same was not maintainable. aggrieved, the respondent-insurance company further filed a letters patent appeal before the high court. the letters patent bench set aside the order of the learned single and remitted the matter back upon framing issues for determination by the single judge. it is against the ..... the driver had no licence was open to the insurer which it failed to discharge.3. in that view of the matter, the division bench erred in allowing the letters patent appeal.4. we, therefore, set aside the order and judgment of the division bench, the appeal is allowed. there shall be no order as to costs.

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //