Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 2004 Page 6 of about 108 results (0.114 seconds)

May 07 2004 (SC)

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Central Board, Direct Tax ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC2434; (2004)189CTR(SC)97; 2004(168)ELT147(SC); [2004]267ITR647(SC); 2004(5)SCALE705; (2004)6SCC431

order1. leave granted.2. this appeal is against the judgment dated 24th august, 2000. 3. mr. rohatgi has raised a preliminary objection to the special leave petition being proceeded with by this court. he submits that this court has, in the case of oil and natural gas commission v. collector of central excise reported in : 1992(61)elt3(sc) , held that in every case where a dispute is between government departments and/or between a government department and a public sector undertaking, the matter should be referred to the high powered committee established by the government pursuant to an order of this court dated 11th september, 1991. he pointed out that it has been held by this court that it is the duty of every court or tribunal to demand clearance from the committee and that in the absence of clearance the proceedings must not be proceeded with.4. mr. rohatgi also relied upon the case of c.c.e. v. jeesop and co. ltd. reported in (1999) 9 scc 181 wherein this court has again disposed of an appeal filed by the collector of central excise against two public sector companies by holding that the course indicated in oil and natural gas commission's case (supra) has to be followed. he also relied on a decision of this court in the case of canara bank v. national thermal power corporation reported in (2001) 1 scc 43 wherein it has been held that the purpose of the directions in oil and natural gas commission's case (supra) is to see that frivolous litigation between government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 2004 (SC)

Indian Mineral and Chemicals Co. and ors. Vs. Deutsche Bank

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-04-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC3615; III(2004)BC179; (2004)3CALLT49(SC); [2005]123CompCas4(SC); 2004(3)CTC380; [2004(4)JCR147(SC)]; JT2004(5)SC64; 2004(6)SCALE110; (2004)12SCC376; (2004)2UPLBEC1

..... of leave :'i do really protest against questions of difficulty and importance being dealt with by an application to revoke the leave under cl.12, letters patent and to take the plaint off the file. normally it is well settled that the proper way to plead to the jurisdiction of the court is to ..... all these matters will have to be decided on evidence and cannot be decided on an application for revocation of leave under clause 12 of the letters patent.15. the observations of rankin cj in secretary of state v. gulab rai pali ram (supra) correctly represents the law as to how the court should ..... the jurisdiction of the high court.10. we are of the opinion that the learned judges erred in revoking leave under clause 12 of the letters patent in view of the clear assertions made in the plaint and the assertions in a plaint must be assumed to be true for the purpose of ..... been ready for hearing since that date.8. on 30th august 1999, the respondent made an application for revocation of leave under clause 12 of the letters patent on the ground that no part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the calcutta high court. the learned single judge dismissed the application ..... the impugned order, the division bench has allowed the respondent's application for revocation of leave which had been granted under clause 12 of the letters patent 1865 to the appellants to file a suit against the respondent in the calcutta high court. leave was revoked on the ground that no part of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 2004 (SC)

State of Haryana Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-04-2004

Reported in : JT2004(5)SC72; 2004(6)SCALE75; (2004)12SCC673

..... case in which a decree of injunction had been granted restraining the computation, assessment, levying and collection of certain taxes on oil and gas products under a lease of trust patent indian lands on the ground that the plaintiff was an instrumentality of the federal government and was, therefore immune from taxation by the state. the decision was based upon earlier .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2004 (SC)

Gopaldas Udhavdas Ahuja and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-06-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC3830; (2004)190CTR(SC)1; 2004(176)ELT3(SC); [2004]268ITR273(SC); JT2004(5)SC300; 2004(6)SCALE141; (2004)7SCC33

..... innocent possessors of the said gold. accordingly, the trial judge quashed the orders of penalty and confiscation passed by the gold control authorities. being aggrieved, the department herein, filed letters patent appeal no. 19 of 1992 before the division bench of the bombay high court. by impugned judgment dated 5.1.1994, the division bench allowed the l.p.a. no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2004 (SC)

The State of Kerala Etc. Etc. Vs. Arya Refrigeration and a/C Co. Etc. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-03-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC3938; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)940; 2004(2)ARBLR556(SC); 2004(3)AWC2581(SC); 98(2004)CLT694(SC); 2004(3)KLT516(SC); 2004(6)SCALE429; (2004)7SCC546; [2004]54SCL579(SC)

..... interference with the reasoned award is extremely limited. nothing has been shown to show that the arbitrator overlooked any relevant piece of material or that the award suffered from any patent illegality.7. though there was some dispute about the applicability of the act in view of the accepted position at all stages that the act applied to the proceedings, such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2004 (SC)

Pramod Kumar Srivastava Vs. Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-06-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC4116; 2004(3)AWC2703(SC); 2004(3)BLJR1884; JT2004(6)SC380; 2004(6)SCALE491; (2004)6SCC714; 2005(1)SLJ58(SC); (2004)3UPLBEC2581

..... wherein different examiners examine the answer-books on the basis of model answers prepared by the head examiner with the assistance of other examiners. it was pleaded in the letters patent appeal preferred by the commission and which fact has not been disputed that the model answer was not supplied to the two teachers of the patna science college. there can ..... a direction was issued to the commission to re-consider the case of the appellant treating his marks in general science paper as 63.6. the commission preferred a letters patent appeal against the aforesaid judgment and order of the learned single judge which was allowed by the division bench by the impugned judgment and order dated 16-4-2003 and ..... writ petitioner has preferred this appeal by special leave against the judgment and order dated 16-4-2003 of a division bench of patna high court by which the letters patent appeal preferred by bihar public service commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the commission') was allowed and the judgment and order dated 11-9-2001 of a learned single judge whereby .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2004 (SC)

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Shyam Lal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-12-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC4271; 2004(6)ALD98(SC); 2004(3)AWC2697(SC); 113(2004)DLT1(SC); [2004(102)FLR1021]; JT2004(6)SC347; (2004)IIILLJ532SC; 2004(6)SCALE611; (2004)8SCC88; 2005(1)SLJ56(S

..... , j. 1. delhi transport corporation (hereinafter referred to as the 'employer') calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a division bench of the delhi high court in letters patent appeal no. 298/2002 filed by the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the 'workman'). 2. background facts in a nutshell are as follows:the respondent-workman was found to have ..... )(b) of the act was to be granted to the employer to dismiss the respondent-workman. 4. the workman assailed the judgment of the learned single judge by filing letters patent appeal. by the impugned judgment by which several lpas and writ petitions were disposed of, the view of the tribunal was restored and that of learned single judge was set ..... making the admission to show why the admission is not to be acted upon. 8. be that as it may, we find that the division bench while dealing with letters patent appeal filed by the workman based its conclusions on other cases which related to unauthorized absence and where the factual background was not similar to those involved in the present .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2004 (SC)

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Sardar Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-12-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC4161; 2004(3)AWC2685(SC); 113(2004)DLT258(SC); [2004(102)FLR1031]; JT2004(6)SC342; (2004)IIILLJ543SC; (2005)1MLJ40(SC); 2004(6)SCALE613; (2004)7SCC574; 2005(1)SLJ4

..... . the employer approached the delhi high court and learned single judge of the court held that the disapproval by the tribunal was not in order. the concerned employees preferred letters patent appeals before the delhi high court. a division bench of the court by the impugned judgment disposed of several l.p.as. being of the view that the tribunal's .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2004 (SC)

Balvant N. Viswamitra and ors. Vs. Yadav Sadashiv Mule (Dead) Through ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-13-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC4377; 2004(3)AWC2689(SC); 2005(2)BomCR259; JT2004(6)SC403; 2004(6)SCALE636; (2004)8SCC706; 2004(2)LC1440(SC)

..... jurisdiction which it did not have; a mere wrong exercise of jurisdiction does not result in a nullity. the lack of jurisdiction in the court passing the decree must be patent on its lace in order to enable the executing court to take cognizance of such a nullity based on want of jurisdiction, else the normal rule that an executing court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2004 (SC)

Punjab National Bank and ors. Vs. Ashwini Kumar Taneja

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC4155; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)1111; 2004(4)AWC2904(SC); [2004(102)FLR1023]; JT2004(6)SC418; (2004)IIILLJ536SC; 2005MPLJ225(SC); 2004(7)SCALE16; (2004)7SCC265; 2005(1)SLJ30

..... , the writ petition was allowed with a direction to forthwith consider the case of respondent herein for compassionate appointment and provide him suitable job. the order was challenged in letters patent appeal. by the impugned judgment the same was dismissed. it was held that retiral benefits received by the heirs of the deceased employee cannot be made a ground for rejecting .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //