Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Year: 1958 Page 10 of about 384 results (0.029 seconds)

Mar 19 1958 (HC)

Madanmohan and ors. Vs. Hari Anandilal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-19-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Bom269; (1958)60BOMLR829; ILR1959Bom256

..... appeal, set aside the decree of the two court's below the decree the plaintiff's suit with costs in all the courts. 13. leave to appeal under the letters patent is refused.14. appeal allowed.

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1958 (HC)

Pulipati Subbarao and Co. Vs. Appellate Asstt. Commissioner of Income- ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-19-1958

Reported in : AIR1959AP505; [1959]35ITR673(AP)

..... if he were to embark upon a fresh enquiry as to the quantum of the income or the loss incurred by the petitioner. 9. as there is a clear and patent want of jurisdiction on the part of the 2nd respondent to make a de novo assessment on the petitioner, a writ of prohibition shall be issued directing the 2nd respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1958 (SC)

Express Newspapers (Private) Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-19-1958

Reported in : AIR1958SC578; (1961)ILLJ339SC; (1964)ILLJ9SC; [1959]1SCR12

..... shed and continue to shed, more light on the public and business affairs of the nation than any other instrumentality of publicity; and since informed public opinion is the most patent of all restraints upon mis-government, the suppression or abridgment of the publicity afforded by a free press cannot be regarded otherwise than with gave concern. the tax here involved .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1958 (SC)

Keshavlal Lallubhai Patel and ors. Vs. Lalbhai Trikumlal Mills Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-1958

Reported in : AIR1958SC512; (1958)60BOMLR948; [1959]1SCR213

..... . if the normal state of affairs contemplated by the second condition refers to the normal state of affairs in the political situation in the country that would be absolutely and patently uncertain. even if this normal state of affairs is construed favourably to the appellants and it is assumed that it has reference to the working of the mills, that again .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1958 (HC)

Dr. Mukand Lal Vs. Smt. Jyotishmati

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-21-1958

Reported in : AIR1958P& H390; 1958CriLJ1340

ordera.n. grover, j.1. this case is the outcome of an unfortunate trouble between a husband and a wife, who both belong to respectable families. the husband, dr. mukand lal, is the deputy medical superintendent of ripon hospital, simla. he married smt. jyotishmati on 11-12-1932. it is common ground that the wife conceived eleven times but on each occasion she used to have an abortion in the fourth month of the pregnancy. on 14-12-1948, an agreement was entered into between the parties in the presence of the father of the wife and two of her other close relations shri jindra lal, bar-at-law, and shri shankar nath, advocate of simla.it was recited in the agreement that the parties had mutually agreed to separate and to live separately from each other as 'it is best for the two parties to separate and to remain separate on account of the differences and other circumstances that have arisen between them.' the husband was to pay maintenance allowance at the rate of rs. 200/- per month. the other material condition worth noticing is that the wife was to be at liberty to undertake any work or avocation which did not have the effect of lowering the position or status of the husband. after the agreement the wife stayed in her husband's home for a little over a month and thereafter she started living separately. in april, 1950, the husband married another wife dr. rama mehra who was working in a hospital at simla.two children have been born of this marriage, one is a son and the other, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1958 (SC)

Raigarh Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Eastern Railway and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-24-1958

Reported in : AIR1958SC525; (1958)IIMLJ86(SC); [1959]1SCR236

..... . w. &; sons, limited, were competitors of lever brothers, limited, and that eliminated the application of section 27(1) of the railway and canal traffic act of 1888. similarly in lancashire patent fuel company limited v. london and north-western railway company ([1904] xii railway and canal traffic cases, 77, 79), it was held that no competition existed between coal carried for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1958 (HC)

The State Vs. Dial Singh S/O Solakhan Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-24-1958

Reported in : AIR1958P& H310; 1958CriLJ1092

s.b. capoor, j.1. this is an application on, behalf of the state for the grant of sanction under subsection (3) of section 339 of the code of criminal procedure for the prosecution of dial singh respondent for the offence of giving false evidence.2. a woman named tej kaur was said to nave been murdered in village satgoli to whichthe respondent belongs. she had gone out to the fields sometime in january 1954 but did not return and after several days her father sher singh lodged a report of abduction at the police station on 7-2-1954. it was not until some three months later that a woman's dead body was found floating in a well and her parents claimed that it was the dead body of tej kaur.subsequently one hazara singh was suspected of having a hand in the murder; and dial singh, respondent, was made an approver and gave his statement under section 164 of the code of criminal procedure before shri o.g. adya magistrate, karnal, on 26-5-1954. hazara singh was placed on trial for the murder of tej kaur. when dial singh, respondent, was examined asa prosecution witness at the sessions trial on 15-2-1955, he denied all knowledge of the allegedmurder.the trial resulted in the acquittal of hazara singh and the learned sessions judge also discharged the approver. on 21-2-1956, the public prosecutor, karnal, gave a certificate to the effect that either the statement made by the respondent on 26-5-1954, or that made by him on 15-2-1955, was false and that he had thus not complied with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1958 (HC)

Kanwal NaraIn Khanna Vs. Income-tax Officer, Central Circle Iii, New D ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-24-1958

Reported in : [1959]35ITR584(P& H)

mehar singh, j. - this is a petition under article 226 of the constitution and it arise out of the following facts and circumstances. the petitioner for the assessment year 1946-47 had to make a return of his income from various sources, including income from business, and his business consisted of, so far as this petition is concerned, the share of income from ritz cinema in delhi, share of income from novelty cinema in kanpur, and share of income as partner of the delhi talkies bureau. in the assessment of that year the petitioner showed a loss and after his loss had been set against his profits, there still remained an absorbed loss of rs. 29,337. it is not clear, though it has been said so at the time of the hearing, that this unabsorbed loss was, the whole of it, the loss suffered by the petitioner as partner of the delhi talkies bureau. in the case of the assessment year 1948-49 the delhi talkies bureau on assessment was again found to have suffered a loss and the petitioners share of that loss arrived at was rs. 77,405. in the petitioners assessment for the year 1948-49, this loss of his share from the delhi talkies bureau was take into consideration and when set against his income from other sources, the result was that his assessment showed a loss of rs. 26,592. subsequently the 1948-49 assessment of the delhi talkies bureau was revised and on revision its loss was reduced, in consequence of which the petitioners share of loss was reduced for rs. 77,405 to rs. 16,488 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 1958 (HC)

Chinnamuthu Ambalam Vs. S. Jagannatha Chariar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-26-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad89; 1959CriLJ328; (1959)1MLJ135

..... was this minority family of alagaiyanaikapuram the defendant in the suit.the eldest of them the 1st defendant was bombarding the authorities police magistracy, state government etc. to book these patent and potential mischief mongers. these agitators were known to intend to put on a special display to mar the republic day celebrations. on the reports of responsible police officer, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1958 (HC)

Mahendra Pal Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-27-1958

Reported in : AIR1959All313; 1959CriLJ541

..... also, but in their case it is provided that review will be permissible if it is authorized by the letters patent or the other instrument constituting the high court.it is not suggested on behalf of the applicants that the letters patent or the other instrument constituting the allahabad high court contain anything authorising this court to review its judgments. it may .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //