Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Year: 1958 Page 2 of about 384 results (0.011 seconds)

Jan 14 1958 (FN)

Moog Industries, Inc. Vs. Ftc

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-14-1958

..... . 77, a reviewing court should not, in any event, entertain it. if the commission has decided the question, its discretionary determination should not be overturned in the absence of a patent abuse of discretion. accordingly, the judgment in no. 77 is affirmed, and the judgment in no. 110 is vacated and the cause remanded to the court of appeals with directions ..... should be considered by a reviewing court only if raised before the commission; and a determination of it by the commission should not be overturned in the absence of a patent abuse of discretion. pp. 355 u. s. 411 -414. 238 f.2d 43 affirmed. 241 f.2d 37, judgment vacated and cause remanded. per curiam. the general question presented by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 1958 (HC)

Haji Abdul Shakoor Vs. the Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Kanpur a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-14-1958

Reported in : AIR1959All440

..... it refused relief to a petitioner on the ground of his conduct, even though he was able to prove that the order sought to be quashed was vitiated by a patent lack of jurisdiction. in azizun-nisa v. asstt. custodian, : air1957all561 , a division bench of this court rejected thepetition of azimunnisa and others on the ground that it was mala fide .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 1958 (HC)

Manji Khimji Patel of Bhut, Kutch Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-15-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Bom236; (1959)61BOMLR132; ILR1958Bom1319

..... could be considered as sale of goods.4. in our view, the contracts of the nature undertaken by these applicants are not contracts for the sale of goods. this is patently clear on the face of the contracts themselves. that being so, the legislature of a state has no power to levy sales tax by treating these transactions as involving sale .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 1958 (HC)

Firm Gauri Lal Gurdev Das Vs. Jugal Kishore Sharma and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-16-1958

Reported in : AIR1959P& H265

bishan narain, j. 1. these two appeals (e. s. a. 14 of 1954 and e. s. a. 25 of 1954) involve same questions of law which have been referred to this full bench and it will be convenient to decide them by this judgment. 2. the facts leading to execution second appeal no. 14 of 1954 are these judgal kishore etc., filed a suit for the recovery of rs. 1,100/-against gauri shanker etc., in the court of the munsif asansol, district burdwan (state of west bengal). this suit was for the refund of advance made to the defendants for supply of goods and also for compensation. the plaintiffs on 24-1-1951, obtained an ex parte decree for the entire amount claimed by them. the decree-holders are residents of asansol while the judgment-debtors are shown in the decree-sheet as residents of khanna mandi, district ludhiana (state of punjab). apparently the judgment-debtors own property within the jurisdiction of payal court (pepsu state). the decree-holders obtained a certificate in 1953 under order 21 rule 6. civil procedure code, and the necessary papers were sent to the district judge, kapurthala (pepsu) for execution. the decree-holders then applied to the payal court for execution on, 7-10-1953. the judgment-debtors objected to the execution of the decree inter alia on the ground that asansol court had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit as neither did the defendants reside within its jurisdiction nor did any part of the cause of action accrue there. the judgment-debtors also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 1958 (HC)

The Bilaspur Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pr ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-17-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP77

..... that the subordinate police officers were dishonest and privy to the theft of the box. the investigation by the police did not result in any such discovery. negligence, however, was patent.17. we accordingly hold that in the case of a master and servant, where the master is the bailee, and the servant is either dishonest or negligent, the master must .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 1958 (HC)

Sant Ram Lalji Ram Vs. Bhagwat Dass and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-17-1958

Reported in : AIR1958P& H309

k. l. gosain, j.1. this is an appeal by the defendant-mortgagor against a preliminary decree for sale of the mortgaged property passed by shri gurba-chan singh, subordinate judge 1st class, jullundur on 8th may, 1950, and the only point which arises for decision is whether on the terms of the mortgage in question a decree for sale could legally be passed.2. sant ram defendant-appellant made a mortgage of one-half of his agricultural land measuring 121 kanals 4 marlas situate in village saifabad, tahsil phillaur, district jullundur, for a sum of rs. 8,000/- by means of a mortgage deed executed on 10th april, 1947 and registered on 11th april, 1947. the deed inter alia provided that the mortgage was to be without possession but later on it provided as under :--'the land mortgaged shall remain in my possession. i shall pay interest on the mortgage money to the mortgagees, year after year, at the close of the year, after calculating the same at the rate of -/6/- per cent., per mensem. i will pay the principal mortgage money with interest within a year. in case i do not make payment as agreed or beyond that period, the mortgagees, aforesaid, will be competent in future either to realise interest at the rate of -/8/- per cent., per mensem or get possession of the land mortgaged, in lieu of the principal money with interest. when the mortgagees enter into possession, interest will cease to run.they may then either cultivate the land themselves or give it to another person for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1958 (HC)

Commercial and Industrial Bank Limited Vs. Authority Under Payment of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-21-1958

Reported in : (1958)IILLJ31AP

..... , secondly, because the notification itself made no reference to pending applications. the second contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner must therefore be accepted. if so, there is patent want of jurisdiction on the part of the respondent 1 to deal with the petition presented by respondents 2 to 7 on october 24, 1955. if the above conclusion is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1958 (HC)

W. Wood and Son Ltd. Vs. Bengal Corporation

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-21-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Cal8

..... are as follows : the appellant company is the manufacturer of a well-known make of suit-cases, known as revelation suit-cases, and it was expanding hinges, hasps and locks, patented by it, in the manufacture of its goods. on 19-10-1951, the appellant company entered into a contract with the respondent firm, whereby it granted the respondent an exclusive .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1958 (HC)

Harnam Singh Arjan Singh Vs. Punjab State Through the Home Secretary t ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-21-1958

Reported in : AIR1958P& H243

orderbishan narain, j.1. harnam singh alleges himself to be the general secretary of the district kisan sabha, karnal. on 27-6-1957, the district magistrate, karnal, served the following notice on harnam singh :'it has been brought to my notice that the communist party and district kishan sabha propose to organise party conferences and to stage at some places in the district, dramas which are likely to excite feelings of disaffection to the government. under section 7 of the dramatic performances act, 1876, i, bhag singh, district magistrate, karnal, call upon com. harnam singh, general secretary, district kisan sabha, karnal and shahabad, convener of the said conferences and dramas to furnish immediately and in any case not later than 28th june, 1957, details of the dramas proposed to be staged, in order to enable me to ascertain the true character of the same.i hereby prohibit you com. harnam singh, general secretary, district kisan sabha, from performing, staging, acting, managing or doing any act in pursuance of the performance of any drama till my approval is obtained by you.'harnam singh has filed this petition under article 226 of the constitution challenging the validity of this order as well as the validity of the act under which this order was passed.2. the order which i have reproduced above purports to be under section 7 of the dramatic performances act, 1876, and by this order harnam singh is called upon, to furnish details of the dramas proposed to be staged in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1958 (HC)

Shriniwas Vs. Rukmini Raman Pratap Singh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-24-1958

Reported in : AIR1958MP243

..... we have quoted above. 11. a large number of authorities was cited before us, mainly from the election tribunal cases, to which we need not refer here. it is, quite patent that the facts of one election petition are not always the facts of another election petition, and even in the same kind of election petitions there may be shades and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //