Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: old Year: 1980 Page 5 of about 422 results (0.010 seconds)

Feb 05 1980 (HC)

Trading Engineering Vs. Nirmala Devi and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-05-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H115

order1. this is a petition under article 227 of the constitution of india, against the order of the commissioner under workmen's compensation act, dated l4th september, 1979.2. one shri ram chander, workman, resident of sohna, dist. gurgaon, died in an accident on 6th january, 1976. his: widow, shrimati nirmala devi, respondent, filed an application under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, on l3th november, 1978, claiming death compensation of her husband. along with that application, an application for condonation of delay under section 5 of the indian limitation act, was also filed in the written statement filed on behalf of the employer, an objection was taken that the application was not maintainable, as the widow has already received rs. 10,000/- under the motor vehicles act, 1939, as she had applied for compensation along with the parents of her deceased husband in the court o! the motor accident claims tribunal, gurgaon, and she was awarded rs. 10,000/-. it was also stressed that the application is time-barred and also barred-under section 110-aa of the motor vehicles act, 1939. on the pleadings of the parties the learned commissioner framed the following issues:--l. whether the present application is maintainable in view of section 110-aa of the motor vehicles act, 1939, and section 3(5) of the workmen's compensation act, 1923? 2. whether the accident arose out of and during the course of employment? 3. whether the claim application is barred by the limitation ? 4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 1980 (HC)

Sm. Ashalata Dey and ors. Vs. Kamal Kumar Bose

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-06-1980

Reported in : AIR1980Cal271,(1981)1CompLJ235(Cal)

..... supreme court reversed the aforesaid decision of this court the necessity for such an amendment did arise. the plaintiffs therefore have filed the application for amendment in the pending letters patent appeal arid there is neither any gross delay nor does the delay affect or prejudice the defendant in any manner. such being the position, we find no reason why we ..... accordingly. the defendant's appeal was disposed of accordingly on june 26, 1973. against that decision both the plaintiff and the defendant have preferred two independent appeals being the letters patent appeal referred to hereinbefore.5. on nov. 20, 1974 the supreme court reversed the decision of this court in the case of sailendra nath ghosal as above and upheld the ..... order1. this is an application for amendment of the plaint filed in these two letters patent appeals which arise out of a suit for eviction. the application has been heard on contest by the tenant-defendant who is appellant in one of these appeals and respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 1980 (HC)

Sarup Chand Vs. Nagar Palika, Sangrur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-06-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H114

order1. the plaintiff-petitioner bar filed this revision petition against the order of the trial court, whereby application under order 1 rule 10 of the code of civil procedure, field on behalf of respondent no. 2, talia ram, has been allowed.2. the plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction against nagar palika, sangrur, to the effect that the defendant be restrained from demolishing and breaking the wall, mentioned in the notice dated 11th june, 1979, issued by the defendant. during the pendency of this suit, one talia ram filed an application under order 1 rule 10 of the code of civil procedure, with the prayer that he be impleaded as a respondent in the suit. his case is that there is one lane shown by letters abc in the site plan attached and there was a wall in front of this lane which wall was demolished in the year 1978, and any relief granted to the plaintiff in his absence, is likely to affect him adversely, and that he ought to be arrayed as a party so that court may be able to effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the suit this application was contested on behalf of the plaintiff and it was stated that he has got no interest in the suit property and he is not affected thereby. the trial court, after hearing the parties, allowed the application and directed the plaintiff to implead talia ram as defendant. it has been observed by the trial court, that 'contention of the learned counsel for the plaintiff that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 1980 (HC)

Mohinder Nath Vs. Sandhran Rani

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Feb-07-1980

Reported in : AIR1981J& K49

..... by the petitioner in his plaint or set up by the respondent in her written statement. i am of the opinion that by adopting this course there has been a patent material irregularity in the procedure followed by the trial court. the impugned order would also have the effect to cause unnecessary delay in the disposal of the case, a situation ..... the effect of the order is to prolong the trial or where the order causes unnecessary delay in the disposal of the case as also if there has been a patent irregularity in the procedure adopted by the trial court. by postponing the decision of issues nos. 2 and 3, after having decided issue no. 1 against the petitioner, the trial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 1980 (SC)

Kusho Mahton and anr. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-07-1980

Reported in : AIR1980SC788; 1980CriLJ313; 1980Supp(1)SCC344

r.s. sarkaria, j.1. after hearing counsel for the parties, we are of opinion that the appellants have been rightly convicted under section 395, indian penal code, because while carrying away the stolen property they exploded cracker to frighten the inmates of the house who wanted to pursue them. all the appellants are young men and it is stated that they have already served a sentence of about one and half years. there was no attempt to cause injury to any of the inmates of the house or other persons at the time of the commission of the offence or even thereafter. taking into consideration all the circumstances of the case we are of opinion that the ends of justice will be served if the sentence is reduced to imprisonment already undergone. subject to this reduction in the sentence the appeal is dismissed. the bail bonds are discharged.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1980 (HC)

Assistant Collector of Customs Vs. Harbans Lal Sharaf Alias Punjabi Se ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-1980

Reported in : 1985(5)ECC82

..... have been admitted. the exculpatory portion smacks of a laboured attempt at concealing the fact that indian currency and foreign currency was supplied by the respondent. the absurdity is, however, patent. if the respondent was not to pay and take the smuggled gold why he should be taken to the hotel airlines is it imaginable that in an activity like the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1980 (HC)

Asstt. Collector of Customs Vs. Harbans Lal Sharaf

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-1980

Reported in : 1980CriLJ618

..... india have been admitted. the exculpatory portion smacks of laboured attempt at concealing the fact that indian currency and foreign currency was supplied fey the respondent. the absurdity is, however, patent. if the respondent was not to pay and take the smuggled gold why he should be taken to the hotel airlines? is it imaginable that in an activity like the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 1980 (HC)

Satya Dev Vs. Behariji Maharaj, Birajman Mandir and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-11-1980

Reported in : AIR1980All220

..... contended that the 1865 deed was not a forged or a fabricated document but was a genuine document and the view taken by the court below to the contrary was patently erroneous. his contention further was that that document laid down the line of succession and that could not be altered subsequently. in other words, his contention was that so long ..... . g. n. verma then sought to argue that the various reasons given by the lower appellate court to hold that the deed of 1865 was not a genuine document were patently erroneous. he argued that the stamped paper showed the name of the purchaser and the contention to the contrary was erroneous. but these are not the only considerations which have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 1980 (HC)

R. Budhawar Vs. Maharaj Kumar M. Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-11-1980

Reported in : 1980RLR463

..... for about 6 months with him and the grand-mother also frequently comes to see him the mother and the grand-mother cannot be considered casual visitors. the requirement is patently bona fide. nothing has been proved to the contrary.

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 1980 (HC)

Renuka Batra Vs. Grindlays Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-11-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H146

order1. this is a petition filed on behalf of the objector (third party) against the order of the executing court dated 5th may, 1979, whereby her preliminary objection has been decided against her.2. grindleys bank limited obtained a decree for rs. 99,904.82 ex parte on 5th april, 1978, and lodged execution in which warrant of attachment was issued to the executive engineer all india institute of medical sciences, new delhi, prohibiting the payment to the judgment debtor firm. smt renuka batra, a sole proprietor of batra associates, filed an objection petition under order 21 rule 58 of the code of civil procedure in which a preliminary objection was taken that the court at amritsar had no jurisdiction to issue the warrant of attachment prohibiting the payments outside its jurisdiction at delhi. on the pleadings of the parties, the following preliminary issue was framed on 3lst march, 1979, and the parties did not produce any evidence o this issue, though full opportunity was given:--'whether this court has jurisdiction to pass the impugned order of injunction? opdh'3. the executing court came to the conclusion that the warrant of attachment has been properly issued by the executing court at amritsar as it had the jurisdiction and there is no illegality about it reliance has been placed or. british transport co. ltd. v. suraj bhan, air 1963 all 313 and gayoor ahmad khan v. hazarimal, air 1965 raj 41. feeling aggrieved by this order, the objector has come up in revision to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //