Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 66,240 results (0.029 seconds)

Feb 15 2019 (SC)

The State of Gujarat Vs. Pwd and Forest Employees Union

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... october 17, 1988 in respect of forest department as well. this writ petition was allowed by the single judge of the high court vide order dated march 21, 1997. letter patents appeal (lpa) was preferred against the said judgment which was dismissed by the division bench of the high court on april 29, 2003. special leave petition (slp) thereagainst was also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2019 (SC)

Monsanto Technology Llc Thru the Authorised Representative Ms. Natalia ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... counter claim bearing no.51 of 2016 while counter claim bearing no.50 of 2016 challenging the termination of sub licence agreement was withdrawn. the issue for existence of the patent, patent exclusion under section 3(j) of the act was a heavily mixed question of law and facts requiring formal proof and expert evidence, to be considered at the hearing of ..... for its ability to synthesize proteins with pesticidal properties.21. it is the contention of the defendants apart from the unpatentability of the plaintiff s claim, they have not violated patented rights, if any, as: a) nuziveedu sowed seeds of their proprietary cotton varieties alongside the transgenic bt. cotton seed. b) the transgenic bt. cotton seed and the nuziveedu s ..... the ppvfr act becomes operative.17. shri venugopal submitted that a conjoint reading of section 2(j) and section 3(c) of the act makes it clear that it excludes patentability both of transgenic plants (invented through recombinant gene technology in the laboratory) and those invented through conventional breeding techniques even where a new plant, variety or species is initially created ..... the same subject to the limitations prescribed in the agreement. the agreement also provided for payment of licence fee/trait value by the defendants, for use of the plaintiffs patented technology. the agreement after extension was ultimately terminated by the plaintiffs on 14.11.2015 due to disputes regarding payment of licence fee/trait value in view of subsequent price .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2018 (SC)

Govt. Of Nct of Delhi Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... be taken aid of to interpret the constitutional provision and for the said purpose, he had placed reliance on maumsell v. olins92, eastman photographic materials company v. comptroller general of patents, designs and trademarks93, tikri banda dullewe v. padma rukmani dullewe94, black clawson international ltd. v. papierwerke waldhof aschaffenburg95, r.s. nayak v. a.r. antulay96, shrimant shamrao suryavanshi v. pralhad .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2018 (SC)

The Goa Foundation Vs. M/S Sesa Sterlite Ltd. And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... would not like to incur the high costs involved in exploration activities and then compete for that resource in an open auction. the logic is similar to that applied in patents. firms are given incentives to invest in research and development with the promise of exclusive access to the market for the sale of that invention. such an approach is economically ..... receipt of any report from the indian bureau of mines and even before the expiry of the statutory waiting period, the state of goa renewed some mining leases. this is patently illegal.121. we were informed by the learned additional solicitor general that of the 88 mining leases that were renewed, 38 of them are not working for a variety of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 2017 (SC)

Asstt Director of Income Tax I New Delhi Vs. M/S E Funds It Solution I ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , purely intangible property cannot qualify in any case. in particular, rights such as participations in a corporation, claims, bundles of claims (like bank accounts), any other type of intangible property (patents, software, trademarks etc.) or intangible economic assets the goodwill of an enterprise) do not in themselves constitute a pe. they can only form part of pe constituted regular clientele or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2017 (SC)

Indira Jaising Vs. Supreme Court of India Through Secretary General .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... grounds of character and temperament. the advisory committee, if it finds that, the candidate meets the criteria, it will recommend the shortlisted names to the government to be granted the patent of precedence. 33 15. so far as india is concerned, it appears that the legal profession acquired roots in the years of british rule. the first british court was established ..... her of a patent; (ii)s/he must have professional independence; (iii) s/he must have a proven capacity for excellence in the practice of advocacy; (iv) s/he must have a proven capacity ..... ); (b) the president of the high court; (c) the attorney general; (d) bar council s chairperson; (e) law society s president; (f) a lay member. the criteria for grant of patent of precedence is as follows- (i) legal practitioner must have displayed a degree of competence and a degree of probity appropriate to and consistent with the grant to him or ..... office of queen s counsel came to fore. this was an unprecedented office. in the year 1597, francis bacon was appointed by queen elizabeth i as learned counsel extraordinary , without patent (i.e. it was not a formal order). in 1603, the king designated francis bacon as the king s counsel, and bestowed upon him the right of pre-audience and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2017 (SC)

The High Court of Meghalaya Bar Association Vs. The Registrar General

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... grounds of character and temperament. the advisory committee, if it finds that, the candidate meets the criteria, it will recommend the shortlisted names to the government to be granted the patent of precedence. 33 15. so far as india is concerned, it appears that the legal profession acquired roots in the years of british rule. the first british court was established ..... her of a patent; (ii)s/he must have professional independence; (iii) s/he must have a proven capacity for excellence in the practice of advocacy; (iv) s/he must have a proven capacity ..... ); (b) the president of the high court; (c) the attorney general; (d) bar council s chairperson; (e) law society s president; (f) a lay member. the criteria for grant of patent of precedence is as follows- (i) legal practitioner must have displayed a degree of competence and a degree of probity appropriate to and consistent with the grant to him or ..... office of queen s counsel came to fore. this was an unprecedented office. in the year 1597, francis bacon was appointed by queen elizabeth i as learned counsel extraordinary , without patent (i.e. it was not a formal order). in 1603, the king designated francis bacon as the king s counsel, and bestowed upon him the right of pre-audience and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2017 (SC)

National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms Joint ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... grounds of character and temperament. the advisory committee, if it finds that, the candidate meets the criteria, it will recommend the shortlisted names to the government to be granted the patent of precedence. 33 15. so far as india is concerned, it appears that the legal profession acquired roots in the years of british rule. the first british court was established ..... her of a patent; (ii)s/he must have professional independence; (iii) s/he must have a proven capacity for excellence in the practice of advocacy; (iv) s/he must have a proven capacity ..... ); (b) the president of the high court; (c) the attorney general; (d) bar council s chairperson; (e) law society s president; (f) a lay member. the criteria for grant of patent of precedence is as follows- (i) legal practitioner must have displayed a degree of competence and a degree of probity appropriate to and consistent with the grant to him or ..... office of queen s counsel came to fore. this was an unprecedented office. in the year 1597, francis bacon was appointed by queen elizabeth i as learned counsel extraordinary , without patent (i.e. it was not a formal order). in 1603, the king designated francis bacon as the king s counsel, and bestowed upon him the right of pre-audience and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2017 (SC)

Chrisomar Corporation Vs. Mjr Steels Private Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... law is concerned, the admiralty law of the chartered high courts has historically been traced to the charters of 1774 and 1798 as subsequently extended and clarified by the letters patents of 1823, 1862 and 1865. the admiralty court act, 1840 and 1861, and the colonial courts of admiralty act, 1890 and 1891 essentially stated what the admiralty law in this ..... of the act. by section 17, the admiralty court acts of 1840 and 1861 and the colonial courts of admiralty acts of 1890 and 1891 stand repealed. also, the letters patent of 1865, insofar as it applies to the admiralty jurisdiction of the bombay, calcutta and madras high courts, also stands repealed.16. an admiralty action in the courts of india .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2017 (HC)

Philco Industries and Ors. Vs. The Dy. Controller of Patents and Desig ...

Court : Kolkata

..... such features before concurring with the earlier finding that novelty resides in the surface pattern of scarf as illustrated. in anuradha doval versus the controller of patents and designs & ors.being aid no.1 of 2015 on 13th april, 2017, this court had the occasion to consider what would constitute in ..... appeal with the design with the novelty as claimed in the petition was published prior to the date of registration. in itc limited versus controller of patents & designs reported at 2017 (2) chn (cal) 367 this court had the occasion to consider the question of novelty and originality of a design ..... and colour combination. the deputy controller has relied upon the decision of the hon ble high court in gopal glass works ltd.versus asstt controller of patents & designs reported at 2006 (33) ptc434(cal) and applied the tests therein in order to ascertain if the design is new and original as ..... mr.souvik kundu, adv. for the respondent no.2. the court : the appeal is arising out of an order passed by the deputy controller of patents and designs on 28th june, 2016 in connection with the petition for cancellation of registered design no.205014 filed by the appellant under section 19 of the ..... and dent resistant bow which is primarily a utensil bowl for keeping solid, liquid and for feeding and has filed a patent application in the year 2006 for registration of its patent with regard to the mode of construction and functionality of the said product. it was contended that the private respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //