Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: allahabad Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 11 results (0.007 seconds)

Dec 17 1980 (HC)

Krishna Kumar Roy Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-17-1980

Reported in : AIR1981All287

..... with, yetif the expert body takes a view which noreasonable person could take them the courtcould and ought to interfere. as pointed outby lord denning in baldwin and francisltd. v. patents appeal tribunal, ((1959) 2 aller 433) even on technical matters a courtcan hear arguments of counsel and consulttext books, technical dictionaries, etc. or evenbe informed through assessors, and thecourt's ..... already started in pursuance of the admissions. we could on this ground have declined to interfere altogether but for the fact that the mistake pointed out by him is too patent and some admissions are still going on from the waiting list and the petitioner still stands a chance of securing admission. we, therefore, make it clear that the candidates who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gauri Shankar Agrawal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-07-1980

Reported in : [1981]131ITR27(All)

..... . sd. r.s.p.'4. the writ petition filed by bachan singh and others was allowed on 13th july, 1967, by a single judge of this court, but a letters patent appeal filed against it, succeeded, as the division bench by its order dated 28th august, 1969, upheld the decision of the board of revenue. special appeal preferred against this order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1980 (HC)

Sudhir Sharma Vs. S.T.A. (T) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-02-1980

Reported in : AIR1980All352

..... is therefore entitled to maintain the petition.13. in view of the above discussion we hold that the state transport authority as well as the appellate tribunal both have committed patent error in upholding the respondents' right to ply their vehicles on the route published under section 68-c of the act.14. we, therefore, allow the petition and quash the ..... not be covered by section 68-f (1-a) consequently the permits granted to private operators did not cease to be effective.7. the appellate tribunal, in our opinion, committed patent error in holding that the corporation had not obtained permits under section 68-f (1-a) of the act for the routes included in the notifications published under section 68 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 1980 (HC)

Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Special Ward

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-30-1980

Reported in : (1981)21CTR(All)54; [1981]127ITR287(All); [1980]4TAXMAN490(All)

..... any collusion between the petitioner and sri k. annadhanam, it is obvious that the reason put forward by the chartered accountant for declining to audit the petitioner's accounts was patently frivolous.12. a chartered accountant is not usually wholly ignorant of. law and it is inconceivable that sri annadhanam or his firm was unaware of the legal position that merely .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1980 (HC)

The Pioneer Limited Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-15-1980

Reported in : (1980)IILLJ420All

..... the workman with continuity of service and back wages.6. learned counsel for the petitioner-company made only one submission before us he urged that the labour court committed a patent error in reinstating the workman, as he had attained the age of superannuation. he further urged that the labour court committed an error in granting the relief of reinstatement without .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 1980 (HC)

Satya Dev Vs. Behariji Maharaj, Birajman Mandir and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-11-1980

Reported in : AIR1980All220

..... contended that the 1865 deed was not a forged or a fabricated document but was a genuine document and the view taken by the court below to the contrary was patently erroneous. his contention further was that that document laid down the line of succession and that could not be altered subsequently. in other words, his contention was that so long ..... . g. n. verma then sought to argue that the various reasons given by the lower appellate court to hold that the deed of 1865 was not a genuine document were patently erroneous. he argued that the stamped paper showed the name of the purchaser and the contention to the contrary was erroneous. but these are not the only considerations which have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1980 (HC)

Jokhan and ors. Vs. the Joint Director of Consolidation, Allahabad and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-24-1980

Reported in : AIR1980All215

..... land and have succeeded in acquiring the right claimed. however. i am not prepared to hold that the appellate authority and the revisional court have patently erred in appreciating the claim of the petitioners based on estoppel, acquiescence or adverse possession. 20. it has also been suggested that the petitioners nos ..... quite satisfactory and the same judgment has been confirmed by the revisional court hence i am not prepared to hold that the judgments suffer from patent error or they stand vitiated in law due to the circumstance that the last two courts have referred to the ex parte decree in favour ..... to demonstrate that the appell st e authority and the revisional court have misread or misappreciated the evidence on record which has brought in any patent error in their impugned judgments. i do not agree with the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the judgments of the ..... favour of mahadeo was ultimately abated, the order of abatement would be final between the parties and the appellate authority and the revisional court have patently erred in placing reliance upon the ex parte decree in favour of mahadeo, father of the contesting opposite parties nos. 3 to 7, the ..... this court. 4. the learned counsel for the petitioners has contended before me that the appellate authority as well as the revisional court have patently erred in recognizing the claim of the contesting opposite parties on the basis of an ex parte decree specially when the suit in which the ex .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 1980 (HC)

Commissioner, Sales Tax Vs. Pali Ram Laxmi Narain

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-07-1980

Reported in : [1980]46STC89(All)

..... of tikuli before the full bench in commissioner of sales tax v. jai shri products 1974 u.p.t.c. 146 (f.b.).3. the rationale of the order is patently erroneous. how could a concession by the standing counsel amount to a declaration of law what was not pressed before the full bench might have resulted in finality of judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 1980 (HC)

Smt. Hubraji Vs. the Authorised Chief Settlement Commissioner, U.P. Bi ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-04-1980

Reported in : AIR1980All231

..... by opposite party no. 1.(4) there was no violation of rule 90 of the displaced persons (compensation & rehabilitation) rules and the finding recorded by opposite party no. 1 is patently incorrect.(5) in case opposite parties 2 to 4 challenged the auction held in favour of the petitioner they could do so only by taking recourse to the procedure pre .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1980 (HC)

Chandra Bhan and anr. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-28-1980

Reported in : 1981CriLJ196

h.n. kapoor 1. the appeal has been filed by chandrabhan and ram sajiwan against the order and judgment dated 3-2-1979 of the addl. sessions judge, kanpur in sessions trial no. 406 of 1978 convicting them under section 302/149 i.p.c. and sentencing each of them to life imprisonment for committing the murder of ashok. they have further been convicted under section 307/149, i.p.c. and sentenced to seven years' r. i. each for making the murderous assault on dr. bhanchandra, they have also been convicted under sections 452 and 148 i.p.c. and sentenced to two years: r. i. and one year's r. i. respectively. all the sentences have been directed to run concurrently. the revision has been filed by dr. bhanchandra, the injured against both the accused persons for enhancement of their sentences.2. the prosecution story, as revealed in the first information report and by the prosecution evidence briefly stated, is as follows, there is a small town of maitha within the police circle, p. s. sheoli, district kanpur, it has a railway station. dr. bhanchandra is a respectable citizen of that place. he is also a medical practitioner and was having good practice. he has a good residence there in the outer hall of which he was having his clinic. there was also a sub-post office in that very hall and dr. bhan chandra was himself the sub-postmaster. surya bhushan srivastava (p. w. 1) was the station master of the railway station maitha. he war, posted there since august, 1976. the daughter of his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //