Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 62 results (0.050 seconds)

Dec 28 2004 (HC)

Challapalli Ravi and ors. Vs. Sri B. Krupanandam, I.A.S., Secretary, I ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-28-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALT249

..... bona fide one, since the subsequent events even after admission of the contempt case disclose the continuous disobedience to the order of the court. the transgression is so serious and patent, leaves us with no option except to punish the respondents for contempt of court. an idea must not be harboured that a person who has willfully committed a breach to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 28 2004 (HC)

Challappli Ravi and ors. Vs. B. Krupanandam, Ias, Industries and Comme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-28-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD356

..... bona fide one, since the subsequent events even after admission of the contempt case disclose the continuous disobedience to the order of the court. the transgression is so serious and patent, leaves us with no option except to punish the respondents for contempt of court. that an idea must not be harboured that a person who has wilfully committed a breach .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 2004 (HC)

S.K. Mahaboob Ali, Ex-crpf Constable Vs. Director General of Police, C ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD530; 2005(1)ALT412; 2005(192)ELT143(AP)

..... between the earlier and later decisions of the supreme court consisting of equal number of judges, the later decision prevails. the majority of the full bench in govindanaik v. west patent press co. : air1980kant92 (f.b.) held that if two decisions of the supreme court on a question of law cannot be reconciled and one of them is by a larger .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2004 (HC)

Jeenu Nookaraju and ors. Vs. Chakravarthula Venkata Raghava Charyuly a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-30-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD745; 2005(2)ALT215

..... single judge by a separate order dated 23rd january 1998, which is the subject-matter of the present appeal instituted on 24th september, 1998 and it was registered as letters patent appeal no. 2 of 1999. before the present appeal was instituted, the learned single judge also decided the main appeal (a.s. no. 3326 of 1982) itself on 2nd february .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2004 (HC)

N. Dolendra Prasad Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-18-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD545

..... are of the view that the action of the respondents in waiving an essential pre-qualification condition in favour of the seven bidders qualifying them as pre-qualified tenderers is patently arbitrary, irrational, discriminatory suffering from malice in law and for that reason the selection of the seven bidders to be placed on the select list of short-listed pre-qualified ..... in state of m.p. v. nandlal jaiswal,. : [1987]1scr1 , held that a policy decision can be interfered with by the courts only if such decision is shown to be patently arbitrary, discriminatory or mala fide. in the matter of different modes under the rule of general application made under m.p. excise act, the court found that the four different .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2004 (HC)

Eranki Srirama Murthy (Died) and ors. Vs. Eranki Atchuta Venkata Subra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-18-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALT569

..... and of the learned single judge that ex.b-12 is not vitiated by fraud, undue influence, misrepresentation or coercion, no interference is called for by us in this letters patent appeal. we have gone through the record and are satisfied that the findings recorded are borne on record and the view taken by the trial court as well as the ..... . by the same judgment, cross-objections of the defendants for costs were also dismissed. thus, confirming the judgment and decree of the trial court, the appeal was dismissed. this letters patent appeal is against the said judgment and decree.9. we heard the learned counsel for the parties and were taken through the record. on the issue that the settlement deed ..... devinder gupta, c.j.1. this letters patent appeal arises out of the judgment and decree passed by the learned single judge of this court in a.s. no. 2108 of 1993 dismissing the appeal of the plaintiffs/ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2004 (HC)

Eranki Srerama Murthy and ors. Vs. Eranki Atchuta Venkata Subramanyam ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-18-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD817

..... and of the learned single judge that ex.b.12 is not vitiated by fraud, undue influence, misrepresentation or coercion, no interference is called for by us in this letters patent appeal. we have gone through the record and are satisfied that the findings recorded are borne on record and the view taken by the trial court as well as the ..... . by the same judgment, cross-objections of the defendants for costs were also dismissed. thus, confirming the judgment and decree of the trial court, the appeal was dismissed. this letters patent appeal is against the said judgment and decree.9. we heard the learned counsel for the parties and were taken through the record. on the issue that the settlement deed ..... devinder gupta, c.j.1. this letters patent appeal arises out of the judgment and decree passed by the learned single judge of this court in a.s. no. 2108 of 1993 dismissing the appeal of the plaintiffs/ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 2004 (HC)

Jandhalaya Krishna Murthy Vs. Tullimilli Kotaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-09-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD205

..... and purpose of enactment. for this purpose, where necessary, the court may even depart from rule that the plain words should be interpreted according to their plain meaning to avoid patent injustice anomaly or absurdity or invalidation of a law (see : m/s. giridharilal and sons v. balbir nath mathur, : [1986]1scr383 ).24. the supreme court further observed in state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 2004 (HC)

Fathima Bee (Died) by Lrs. Vs. S. Ibraheem Sab (Died) by Lrs.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-04-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD823; 2005(1)ALT649

..... of bringing the legal representatives on record, particularly when the proceedings under letters patent appeals are also governed by the provisions of c.p.c. further, the purport of rule 9 of order 22 was not considered. however, since a.s. no. 72 of ..... to whether such a distinction can be maintained at all, as long as the proceedings, be it, the appeals under the provisions of c.p.c., or those under letters patent, arise out of the suits. except stating that both the kinds of appeals are different; the bench did not point out the basis for such a distinction, in the context ..... implead the legal representatives and then dispose of the matter according to law.para-9: we may observe that we cannot follow the same procedure in this case. the letters patent appeal does not arise out of the second appeal, but, it is an appeal against the judgment of the learned single judge. further, as we are of the view that ..... distinction was made between the proceedings arising out of appeal under section 96 and second appeal under section 100 c.p.c, on the one hand, and those under letters patent. the bench did not express any doubt as to the permissibility of such a course of action, in relation to the appeals and second appeals. a reading of the following .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2004 (HC)

G. Rama Sharma Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Legisla ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-01-2004

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD503; 2005(4)ALT98

..... of india v. h.c. goel : (1964)illj38sc , this court held that if the conclusion, upon consideration of the evidence, reached by the disciplinary authority, is perverse or suffers from patent error on the face of the record or based on no evidence at all, a writ of certiorari could be issued.14. in the light of parameters of judicial review .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //