Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 38 results (0.055 seconds)

Sep 11 2015 (HC)

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-11-2015

..... , would not like to incur the high costs involved in exploration activities and then compete for that resource in an open auction. the logic is similar to that applied in patents. firms are given incentives to invest in research and development with the promise of exclusive access to the market for the sale of that invention. such an approach is economically ..... vires and intra vires the provisions of the constitution. nevertheless, it cannot and will not compare which policy is fairer than the other, but, if a policy or law is patently unfair to the extent that it falls foul of the fairness requirement of article 14 of the constitution, the court would not hesitate in striking it down. ? (emphasis supplied) 21 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2015 (HC)

Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary and Others Vs. Principal Secretary, Revenue ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-23-2015

..... the document in question. as the provisions of section 22a of the act are not attracted, the order of the 2nd respondent confirming the order of the 3rd respondent is patently illegal and without jurisdiction. 13. the impugned order of the 2nd respondent, confirming the order of the 3rd respondent, is set aside. the 3rd respondent shall, in accordance with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2015 (HC)

The Colliery Manager, Morgan €™s Pit, Singareni Collieries ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-08-2015

nooty ramamohana rao, j. this intra-court appeal under clause 15 of letters patent is preferred against the judgment rendered by a learned single judge of this court in c.m.a.no.686 of 1995. the colliery manager of singareni collieries company is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 2015 (HC)

M/s. Felguera Gruas India Private Ltd., Visakhapatnam, rep. by its Dir ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-2015

..... upon merits or constitute adjudication, as such, no letters patent appeal lies. similarly, in the judgment in canbank financial services ltd.'s case (7 supra), it is held that the embargo on appeals under section 37 of the arbitration and ..... letters patent provided only appeals against the judgment and an appeal is filed against mere ordering notice, a division bench of this court has held that ordering of notice does not trench ..... would not render any assistance in support of the case of appellant. 9. on the other hand, in kunala subbarao's case (3 supra), while considering the scope of letters patent (ap) clause 15, it is held that mere ordering notice does not amount to judgment, as such, appeal against such ordering notice is not maintainable. when clause 15 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 2015 (HC)

M. Srividya Chowdary and Another Vs. M. Sreenivasulu and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-2015

..... the first ,appellate court. on second appeal to a single judge of the punjab high court, the auction purchaser lost the day. an appeal under cl. 10 of the letters patent in the punjab high court met the same fate. hence this appeal .. ? in the said case, obviously, no application was made by the judgment debtor for setting aside the sale .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2015 (HC)

Lakshmi Kanth Shinde @ L.K. Shinde Vs. The State of Telangana represen ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-02-2015

..... is contended by the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner that the very action of granting permission by the state government and the prosecution against the petitioner is a patent abuse of process of law and highly illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of article 14 of the constitution of india and opposed to the very spirit and object of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2015 (HC)

M/s. Hindustan Ispat Private Limited Vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, J ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-16-2015

..... the view expressed in the judgment cannot be a ground for invoking the review jurisdiction. in review proceedings, the court shall interfere only when there is a glaring omission or patent mistake or when a grave error has crept in the judgment. (union of india v. sandur manganese and iron ores ltd., [(2013) 8 scc 337]). examination of the question, whether ..... the record", for there is a distinction between a mere erroneous decision and a decision which could be characterised as vitiated by "error apparent"; a review lies only for a patent error; where, without any elaborate argument, one could point to the error and say here is a substantial point of law which stares one in the face, and there could ..... court to exercise its power of review. a review is by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an erroneous decision is reheard and corrected, but lies only for a patent error. (kamlesh verma (supra)). the question which this court is required to consider, in the present proceedings, is whether the order, of which review is sought, suffers from an error ..... cannot be equated with the original hearing of the case, and the finality of the judgment delivered by the court will not be reconsidered except "where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallibility ?. (northern india caterers (india) ltd. (supra); sow chandra kante v. sheikh habib ((1975) 1 scc 674)). a party .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2015 (HC)

Mukesh Kumar and Others Vs. The Debts Recovery Tribunal rep., by its R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-16-2015

..... v. surendra mohnot (2014) 14 scc 77). a review of a judgment is a serious step, and reluctant resort to it is proper only where a glaring omission or a patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallibility. the present stage is not a virgin ground, but review of an earlier order which has the normal ..... on the face of the proceedings is an error which is based on clear ignorance or disregard of the provisions of law. such error is an error which is a patent error and not a mere wrong decision. (t.c. basappa v. t. nagappa (air 1954 sc 440); kamlesh verma (supra). it is essential that it should be something more than .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2015 (HC)

Sardar Inder Singh Sokki and Others Vs. M/s. Geetha Enterprises, rep. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2015

..... lease deed and hence the suit was premature. the trial court and learned single judge of this court in appeal, negatived the contention of defendants. hence the defendants preferred letters patent appeal before the division bench. the same plea was taken by the appellants before the division bench. on behalf of plaintiff it was inter alia argued even assuming by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2015 (HC)

K. Ramachandran and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-29-2015

..... interest of promotee deputy superintendents of police would get adversely affected. hence, we are of the opinion that an appeal against any such order is maintainable. 6. whether a letters patent appeal is maintainable? when writ proceedings rules do not provide for an intra-court appeal, whether lpa is maintainable? writ proceedings rules, is a special law and hence, lpa is ..... not maintainable against an order passed in a writ petition, either interim or final. clause 15 of letters patent granted by her majesty in council provides for an intra-court appeal. right to prefer an appeal in a judicial proceeding can only be granted by a statutory exercise. writ .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //