Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 1 of about 5,310 results (0.045 seconds)

Feb 14 2017 (HC)

Dr. G. Srinivasan Vs. Voltamp Transformers Limited, Chetpet and Others

Court : Chennai

..... defendant at sivaganga. therefore, without establishing the infringement, the plaintiff, merely on the basis of some photocopy of the diagram, cannot claim that there is an infringement of patent. as already stated above, he has not even sought any expert opinion to compare the two transformers to prove the alleged infringement. without expert's opinion comparing the plaintiff ..... would not enable an average skilled person in the field to construct such transformer. it is submitted by the learned counsel for the defendants that the plaintiff has obtained patent, without disclosing any inventive steps, in order to prevent the others from carrying on their legitimate business in the same field. therefore, the learned counsel for the defendants ..... that he is an expert in erecting, installing, low tension and high tension transformers substations. the plaintiff has also failed to get technical analysis report comparing the plaintiff's patent specifications with the transformers manufactured and installed by 1st defendant on the orders placed by 3rd defendant. further, the alleged circuit diagram displayed at the site of 3rd defendant ..... for power production and distribution. he also had discussions with the tamil nadu electricity board for possible implementation of the said project. according to the plaintiff, in the said patent for "midget transformers" he has mentioned a particular type of transformer, which is coded as 363 digitally and dyyn 11 in vector group, and the same consists of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2017 (HC)

M/s. Maya Appliances Private Limited, Besant Avenue, Adyar, Chennai an ...

Court : Chennai

..... which are the subject matter of the suit, thus becomes a achilles heel. the functionality of the aspect of framelessness is also admitted, as seen through the application for patent, advertisements made on in the pleadings of the plaint. there are certain admissions made on the similarities on the products, which underwent prior publication and subsequently registered by the ..... into it. the applicants are the prior user/registered proprietor under the designs act, 2000. their application for innovation qua the inventional aspects, is pending before the controller of patent. the respondent has also filed an application under section 19 of the designs act, 2000. there are other persons, who got the registration, of which, one is for ..... relief. appropriate steps would be taken to cancel the said registrations. they stand on a different footing than that of the respondent. the applications filed for registration under the patent act, would not take away the rights under the designs act. there is no material contradiction in the stand taken by the applicants in the pleadings. accordingly, the ..... that the respondent is also a reputed concern having wide turnover than the applicants. advertisement of the applicants also includes the statement that the products have been registered under the patent act, though factually incorrect. both the counsels addressed the court sprinkling with numerous citations. 14. submission of the applicants:- the learned senior counsel appearing for the applicants/ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2016 (HC)

Cadila Healthcare Limited, Rep. by Deputy General Manager (Legal) Mehu ...

Court : Chennai

..... plaintiff that it has got a very modern research and development center at moraiya, where more than 650 research scientists are working and more than 100 patent applications of the plaintiff have been accepted and patents were also granted in various countries, including usa, japan, european union, etc. 3. the plaintiff would further state that it has developed a formulation of drug .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2016 (HC)

R. Muralidharan Vs. The Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

..... as observed by us, the rub is only the fee to be paid at the entry point. to the extent that an invention is not patentable in india, the benefit of deleting the same at entry point has already been granted. the application of disclaimer, correction or explanation as envisaged ..... international application in accordance with the provisions contained in rule 14. this is stated to be with the objective that since some claims are not patentable in india, those claims can be deleted at the stage of filing of the application. 10. the learned assistant solicitor general also does not dispute ..... said act and may be prescribed by the central government as it deems fit. 9. the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to plead that the patent (amendment) rules, 2016 have been issued on 16.5.2016 and are to be made applicable from the date of their notification. the learned ..... what the petitioner claims is that the disclaimer, correction or explanation should be permitted prior to the entry stage, so that those aspects of patent which are not patentable in india will not be required to be included in application and fee paid on the same. thus, the endeavour is really a fee ..... said act reads as under: section 59. supplementary provisions as to amendment of application or specification.- (1) no amendment of an application for a patent or a complete specification or any document relating thereto shall be made except by way of disclaimer, correction or explanation, and no amendment thereof shall be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2016 (HC)

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

..... exercise of power will be regarded as manifestly erroneous. if a power (whether legislative or administrative) is exercised on the basis of facts which do not exist and which are patently erroneous, such exercise of power will stand vitiated. (see cit v. mahindra and mahindra ltd.) the effect of several decisions on the question of jurisdiction has been summed up by ..... officer is obliged to give such an option. in the present case, having regard to the facts and circumstances in which the goods were said to be imported and the patent fraud committed in importing the goods, the additional collector has found that the goods had been imported in violation of the provisions of import (control) order, 1955 read with section ..... ) protection of human, animal or plant life or health; (l) the protection of national treasures of artistic, historic or archaeological value; (m) conservation of exhaustible natural resources; (n) protection of patents, trademarks and copyrights; (o) prevention of deceptive practices; (p) carrying on of foreign trade in any goods by the state, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2016 (HC)

Malabar Diamond Gallery Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Additional Director General ...

Court : Chennai

..... ) protection of human, animal or plant life or health; (l) the protection of national treasures of artistic, historic or archaeological value; (m) conservation of exhaustible natural resources; (n) protection of patents, trademarks and copyrights; (o) prevention of deceptive practices; (p) carrying on of foreign trade in any goods by the state, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the state ..... (prayer: writ appeal filed under clause 15 of letters patent act against the order dated 17.11.2014 made in w.p.18833 of 2013.) s. manikumar, j. 1. writ appeal is directed against the order made in w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 2016 (HC)

Mytrah Energy (India) Limited Vs. Gamesa Renewable Private Ltd.

Court : Chennai

..... to civil proceedings, have a role to play insofar as the consideration of grant of leave or revocation thereof under clause 12 of the letters patent is concerned. this is irrespective of the fact as to what expression is used. as observed aforesaid, the balance of convenience is also forum conveniens. the test ..... 10. forum conveniens: 10. 1. in the abovesaid decision, the question of forum conveniens was also considered by this court while granting leave under section 12 of the letters patent. accordingly, after considering number of pronouncements, it was finally concluded in the following manner: 57. there is little doubt that the principles of forum conveniens, though not applicable ..... the case, let us deal with the word cause of action . the word cause of action has not been defined either under the civil procedure code or under the letters patent. a cause of action has to be seen in the context of territorial jurisdiction available to the court while entertaining a suit. it is the basis for the ..... as under: 8. confidentiality:- for the purposes of this clause, confidential information means any proprietary information of the company, including but not limited to information relating to intellectual property rights, patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, know-how and the following types of information: technical data research, product plans, products, services, customer lists, software, developments, inventions, processes, formulate, technology .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2016 (HC)

The Government of Tamilnadu rep. by its Secretary to Government, Educa ...

Court : Chennai

(prayer: writ appeal filed under clause 15 of the letter patents act against the order dated 16.04.2010 in w.p.no.33784 of 2006.) huluvadi g. ramesh, j. the state has filed this appeal as against the order passed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2016 (HC)

M/s. Bajaj Auto Limited Bombay Pune Road Akurdi Vs. M/s. TVS Motor Com ...

Court : Chennai

..... of the indian evidence act, and marking of press reports and other documents viz. exs.p24 to p27, under section 64(2)(1) of the patents act. the learned judge after taking into consideration, the rival submissions, has directed the learned master to mark the documents and record the objections raised, ..... secret trial/research between the respondent/plaintiff and a third party and the same is not in consonance with section 64(2)(1) of the patents act. 9. it is the primordial submission of the learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant/defendant, that the judgment rendered by the hon' ..... the respondent/defendant therein from using the technology or manufacturing/marketing flame motorcycle or any other product that allegedly infringes the applicant's (plaintiff therein) patent no.195904. 3(iii) the facts relating to the litigation's in the form of above said suits, have been narrated in detail and in ..... 's product viz. tvs flame, which uses the two spark plug with screw fitted and three valves, does not infringe the patent no.195904 of bajaj auto limited (applicant herein) and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from issuance of threats that the plaintiff is infringing the ..... defendant's patent no.195904 and from interfering with the launch and sale of the product tvs flame, and also to direct the defendant to compensate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2016 (HC)

The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government, Education ...

Court : Chennai

(prayer: appeal filed under clause 15 of the letter of patents act against the order dated 21.11.2014 in w.p.no.23713 of 2014) petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india to issue a writ of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //