Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 34 results (0.052 seconds)

Feb 28 1958 (HC)

Blackwood and Sons Ltd. and ors. Vs. A.N. Parasuraman and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-28-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad410

..... am unable to conceive of the possibility of such a course without attributing a local situation to that right.62. earlier i have set out instances of intangible rights like patents and trade marks as affording an analogy for reaching a decision in relation to copyright. the basis of the rule in those cases is to be found in the two ..... a debt be stipulated it will be there situate, the general rule notwithstanding. a cause of action in contract or tort is situate where action may be brought upon it. patents and trade marks are situate where they can be transferred on the same principle as shares in companies......the inference, however, must not be rawn that because no personal property ..... principle which fixes 'situs' with reference to the jurisdiction where the right could be enforced, and (3) lastly the analogy furnished by comparable intangible rights such as patents and trade marks (as to patents see 1932 ac 23858. if the intangible right whose situs has to be determined is a statutory right and owes its existence to a statute enacted by a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 1958 (HC)

R.T. Perumal Vs. John DeavIn and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-24-1958

Reported in : AIR1960Mad43; [1960]30CompCas340(Mad)

..... this view it is not necessary to consider the other contention of mr. gopalaswami iyengar that section 39 of the act would have no application to an appeal under letters patent as it deals only with appeals from one court to another. we hold that the appeals are competent.11. on the merits the only question which arises is whether balakrishna .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 1958 (HC)

R.T. Perumal Vs. John DeavIn and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-24-1958

Reported in : (1960)1MLJ199

..... this view it is not necessary to consider the other contention of mr. gopalaswami iyengar that section 39 of the act would have no application to an appeal under letters patent as it deals only with appeals from one court to another. we hold that the appeals are competent.11. on the merits the only question which arises is whether balakrishna .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 1958 (HC)

K. Parthasarathy Vs. C. Nataraja Odayar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-03-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad156; (1959)1MLJ11

..... take in not only the caste of adi-dravida but also several other castes mentioned in the president's notification under article 341 of the constitution. there is, therefore, a patent defect in the declaration made by the appellant in his nomination paper. the only question is whether the defect is so such substantial that in law the nomination paper should .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1958 (HC)

The Public Prosecutor Vs. S. Joseph

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-12-1958

Reported in : (1960)1MLJ334

..... . wording of sheo swarup reiterated. high court is not justified in an appeal against acquittal in brushing aside the view taken by the trial court which is by no means patently absurd or unreasonable because as a result of labo- rious process o reasoning, it is pos- sible to take a different view on the evidence.atley v. state of u .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 1958 (HC)

L. Kesava Chettiar Vs. M.M. Ramanatha Mudaliar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-30-1958

Reported in : (1960)1MLJ452

ganapatia pillai, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment arid decree of ramaswami, j., in c.m.a. no. 442 of 1953. the decree in that appeal confirmed the decree of the district .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 1958 (HC)

The State of Madras Vs. the Madura Knitting Co., Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-26-1958

Reported in : [1959]10STC155(Mad)

..... or regular. mr. padmanabhan contested this hotly. according to him, a commercial tax officer could only interfere with the orders passed by a deputy commercial tax officer if they were patently illegal or outside his jurisdiction, or there was impropriety in the sense of misconduct like bribery or inducement by immorality being the cause for the order, and irregularity in the ..... given to the commercial tax officer, the deputy commissioner and the board of revenue under section 12(2) of the madras general sales tax act, were confined only to errors patent on the face of the records, and would not extend to probing further into the records like calling for despatch registers and other evidence. this contention must, be rejected forthwith .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1958 (HC)

A. Arunachala Naicker Vs. Ghulam Mahmood Sahib

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-21-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad191; (1959)1MLJ181

..... . a decree for ejectment was passed on 20-8-1846.an appeal was filed against that decree to this court which failed. that decree was further confirmed in the letters patent appeal and the proceedings finally terminated on 23-3-1950 when the tenant was given one year's time to vacate the land. an application for delivery of possession was ..... arose whether a decision of a single judge of the high court under section 76 of the act was subject to a further appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent. the supreme court held that such further appeal lay. in so holding the supreme court observed at page 222 (of mad lj) : (at p. 362 of air) :"the rights created ..... of a new subject-matter of appeal to the appellate jurisdiction already exercised by the high court."4. in that view it was held that clause 15 of the letters patent applied to the case and a further appeal lay to a bench of the high court against the judgment of a single judge. it therefore follows that when a right .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1958 (HC)

G. Hari Prasad Vs. Chief Conservator of Forests, Madras and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-12-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad406; (1958)2MLJ552

..... 226 of the constitution (w.p. no. 1181 of 1956) was dismissed, applied for a certified copy of the judgment to prefer an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent. the judgment in that case was delivered on 11-3-1958, and the petitioner's application for a copy, c. d. 1813 of 1.958, was preferred on 14-3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1958 (HC)

Karuppu Goundan and ors. Vs. Sellammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-12-1958

Reported in : AIR1959Mad279; (1959)1MLJ173

1. the only question in this appeal against the judgment of rajagopalan, j., in a. s. no. 126 of 1949 is whether an alienation by a hindu widow is binding on the reversioners. the properties in suit belonged to one kali goundan who died in 1918 leaving him surviving his widow varadammal and his two daughters who are the plaintiffs in the suit out of which this appeal arises. varadammal sold certain properties belonging to kali goundan and which had devolved on her to her father palani goundan under ex. b-l dated 25-3-1921 for a sum of rs. 2000. the plaintiffs attacked the alienation on the ground that it was not supported by necessity. the consideration of rs. 2000 was made up of the following items : (1) rs. 922-10-8 due for principal and interest in respect of a mortgage executed in favour of one sellappa goundan by varadammal on 2-7-1919 for rs. 800: (2) rs. 100 being the balance due in respect of the mortgage executed by kali goundan himself in favour or one veerayi, (3) rs. 100 being the balance due to chinna goundan under a promissory note executed by kali goundan, (4) rs. 100 due to a nattukottai chetti hank at namakkal borrowed by kali goundan and one ramasi goundan and (5) rs. 777-5-4 which was not paid in cash but for which the purchaser is stated to have executed a mortgage in favour of the vendor. soon after his purchase palani goundan sold the major part of the property purchased by him to the fathers of defendants 1, 2 and 3. 2. at the trial, the evidence .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //