Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 40 results (0.025 seconds)

Nov 04 1980 (HC)

Mohammed Khan Sahib Vs. Ali Khan Sahib and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-04-1980

Reported in : (1981)1MLJ402

..... the plaintiffs father and defendants' mother and they cannot be brushed aside just as a mere coincidence. the trial court's finding that in karaikal region there are many muslim patents having the same name as mentioned in exhibits a-2 and a-3 can-not be accepted as there is absolutely no evidence in support of that finding. it therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-ii Vs. Seshasayee Bros. P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-16-1980

Reported in : (1981)20CTR(Mad)299; [1981]127ITR218(Mad)

..... sought the question that has been referred. 3. among the objects of the company as seen from the memorandum were the following : '3. (1) to purchase or otherwise acquire any patents, brevets and inventions, licences, concessions and the like conferring any exclusive or non-exclusive or limited right to use any invention or privilege, which may seem capable of being used .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-v Vs. Lakshmi Card Clothing Man ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-19-1980

Reported in : [1984]149ITR712(Mad)

..... the licence granted under clause 3, i. e., right to manufacture and sell the card clothing and accessories on the basis of the foreign company's designs and manufacturing methods, patented or unpatented, and for the services rendered under clause 9, an annual payment of 6,000 francs had to be paid to the foreign company. it is significant to note ..... , the foreign company gives to the assessee the sole exclusive non-transferable right to manufacture and sell card clothing and accessories in certain territories on the designs and manufacturing methods patented or unpatented. under clause 9, the foreign company for a period of ten years has to forward to the assessee-company any new data, specifications, processes, revised and additional manufacturing ..... claimed.on appeal, the aac held that the consideration for the services in the shape of technical advice and for the grant of license to exploit the foreign company's patents in india is partly for services and partly in the nature of royalty and it is, therefore, on revenue account and qualified for deduction. on further appeal, the tribunal, after ..... , the kingdom of nepal and neighboring countries of india expect europe, card clothing and accessories as specified in para. (2) on the basis of graf's designs and manufacturing methods patented or unpatented. 9. during a period of ten years from the conclusion of this agreement, graf will forward from time to time to lakshmi any new data, specifications, processes, revised .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1980 (HC)

Ramesh and Company Vs. the Commissioner for Land Revenue and Commercia ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-17-1980

Reported in : [1981]48STC41(Mad)

..... limitation would not bar his powers, he had declined to interfere on the ground of laches on the part of the assessee in going before the tribunal. the order is patently erroneous and cannot be sustained, with the result, his order is set aside and the writ petition is allowed. the matter is remitted back to the commissioner for commercial taxes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1980 (HC)

R.S.K. Chandrasekaran Vs. the Official Receiver, Madurai and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-1980

Reported in : AIR1981Mad235

..... and for consideration, and that therefore that question did not arise. it is the correct ness of this conclusion of the learned judge that is canvassed in the present letters patent appeal.3. section 38(2) of the provincial in solvency act provides for the vesting of the property in the official receiver on the making of an order of adjudication .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1980 (HC)

R.S.K. Chandrasekaran Vs. the Official Receiver and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-1980

Reported in : (1981)1MLJ491

..... good faith for consideration, and that therefore that question did not arise. it is the correctness of this conclusion of the learned judge that is canvassed in the present letters patent appeal.3. section 28(2) of the provincial insolvency act provides for the vesting of the property in the official receiver on the making of an order of adjudication, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1980 (HC)

Perumal and ors. Vs. Ramachandra Padayachi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-12-1980

Reported in : (1982)1MLJ65

..... time. it would have been monstrous, if the law were understood to be different driving the auction-purchasers without a remedy in the world for delivery of possession. it is patent that if their applications were to be dismissed as time-barred they would have to resign themselves to a double jeopardy, while the judgment-debtor sits pretty on the property .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 1980 (HC)

M.V. Chockalingam Pillai and ors. Vs. Alamelu Ammal and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-03-1980

Reported in : AIR1982Mad29

..... of s. 14(1) of the hindu succession act, would be applicable. it is the correctness of that view of the learned judge which has been challenged in this letters patent appeal, by the first defendant.6. according to mr. kesava iyengar, learned counsel for the appellant, the decision in c. s. no. 57 of 1964, will not apply to the ..... view taken by ismail, j. (as he then was) that the plaintiff in this case is entitled to a onefourth share in the suit properties. in the result, the letters patent appeal fails and is dismissed. there will however be no costs.18. appeal dismissed. ..... ramanujam, j.1. this letters patent appeal has been filed against the judgment of ismail j., (as he then was) in a. s. no. 369 of 1970, on the file of this court, which arose out .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1980 (HC)

V. Datchinamurthy and anr. Vs. Asst. Director of Inspection, (intellig ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-21-1980

Reported in : [1984]149ITR341(Mad)

..... the federation were hostile to the interest of the two writ petitioners, the fact that both of them are interest only in thwarting an enquiry by the ito is too patent to be missed. 36. the ito combines two functions, viz., to gather the facts and to adjudicate on them in the light of the law. he does not function as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1980 (HC)

Sudalai Muthu Pillai Vs. Santhanam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-21-1980

Reported in : (1981)1MLJ347

..... firm, or any right or power to realise the property of a dissolved firm, or....and the rest is omitted as not relevant for the present occasion. it is plainly patent from section 69(3) (a) that the disability created under section 69(1) is no legal impediment to a party to the contract in enforcing the unregistered partnership arrangement for .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //