Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 39 results (0.022 seconds)

Feb 23 1990 (HC)

Madras Industrial Linings Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-1990

Reported in : (1990)37TTJ(Mad)59

..... products that are made in the territory in accordance with the said technical information and to export the same to all countries except in those countries outside the territory where patents exist preventing such use or sale. article 2.02 enables the appellant to sub-license the technical knowhow to other indian companies on terms to be specified by the eec ..... become a part of the technical information given under the licence and belonged to the eec. he next referred to article 8 which showed that there was no guarantee against patent infringement from the side of eec in favour of the assessee. he also pointed out that under article 9 the assessee had to pay for any component parts which it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1990 (HC)

Workmen of Kempt (1) Ltd. (Represented by Kempt Employees Union, Throu ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-21-1990

Reported in : (1993)IIILLJ913Mad

..... necessarily to be followed before an order is made under that sub-section. the review contemplated by sub-section (5), which does not limit itself to the correcting of any patent and apparent error or clerical or arithmetical mistake, takes into its fold a fresh determination of the request of the employer or the workman, as the case may be, in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1990 (HC)

State Bank's Staff Union (Madras Circle) Vs. the State Bank of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-19-1990

Reported in : (1991)ILLJ163Mad; (1992)IMLJ131

..... , directed the deduction of the full day's salary of the employees, who participated in the strike. the employees' writ petition to quash the circular was allowed and the letters patent appeal, preferred by the nationalised bank was dismissed. the matter went to the supreme court. the two learned judges viewed the question in the following manner (p 44) : 'the principal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1990 (HC)

State Bank's Staff Union Vs. State Bank of India and Ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-19-1990

Reported in : (1992)1MLJ131

..... , directed the deduction of the full day's salary of the employees, who participated in the strike. the employees writ petition to quash the circular was allowed and the letters patent appeal, preferred by the nationalised bank was dismissed. the matter went to the supreme court. the two learned judges viewed the question in the following manner:the principal question involved .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 1990 (HC)

Gautam Menon Vs. Sucharitha Gautam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-14-1990

Reported in : I(1992)DMC79; (1991)IMLJ212

..... before this court and to contest the proceedings, cannot have any basis when the question of jurisdiction is involved in this case. as stated above clause 17 of the letters patent confers jurisdiction on this court. when the question of jurisdiction is involved the question of convenience as alleged by the respondent does not arise at all for any consideration. hence ..... vizlanagarm v. secy, of state (1937) 44 l.w. 904 : a.i.r. 1937 madras 51 the division bench of this court has held as follows :'under cl. 32 letters patent of 1800, the jurisdiction of high court in regard to infants is plenary and is not subject to limitations as to person or place. so the high court can have ..... respondent herein, under sections 3 and 25 of guardians and wards act, 1890 and order 21, rules 1 and 2 of original side rules, read with cl. 17 of letters patent, 1865 to direct the respondent to deliver the minor children to the custody of the petitioner and for other reliefs. this petition was filed in this court on 19.7 ..... . in pamela williams v. patrick cyril martin : air1970mad427 division bench of this court by considering clause 17 of the letters patent held as follows :'the jurisdiction of the court is all embracing and wide under clause 17 of the letters patent and it is not controlled by the restrictions imposed and on the court exercising jurisdiction under the guardians and wards act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 1990 (HC)

Goutam Menon Vs. Sucharitha Gautam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-14-1990

Reported in : (1991)212MLJ1

..... before this court and to contest the proceedings, cannot have any basis when the question of jurisdiction is involved in this case. as stated above clause 17 of the letters patent confers jurisdiction on this court. when the question of jurisdiction is involved the question of convenience as alleged by the respondent does not arise all for any consideration. hence i ..... i.c. 189 : i.l.r. 1937 mad. 383 : a.i.r. 1935 mad. 51 i he division bench of this court has held as follows:under clause 32, letters patent of 1890, the jurisdiction of high court in regard to infants is plenary and is not subject to limitations as to persons or place. so the high court can have ..... respondent herein, under sections 3 and 23 of guardians and wards act, 1890 and order 21, rules 1 and 2 of original side rules, read with article 17 of letters patent, 1865 to direct the respondent to deliver the minor children to, the custody of the petitioner and for other reliefs. this petition was filed in this court on 19.7 ..... .in pamela williams v. partrick cyril martin : air1970mad427 , division bench of this court by considering clause 17 of the letters patent held as follows:the jurisdiction of the court is all embracing and wide under clause 17 of the letters patent and it is not controlled by the restrictions imposed on the, court exercising jurisdiction under the guardian and wards act.the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1990 (HC)

A.P.S. Bahurudeen and anr. Vs. Antony and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-07-1990

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ563

..... in not exercising the judicial discretion and that his order was rightly not aside by a single judge of this court. consequently, both the judges concurred in dismissing the letters patent appeal which had come before them.11. in sai mahakore and ors. v. shankelchand shukkabai saha and anr. a.i.r. 1935 bom. 26 beaumont, c.j., held that there ..... all of the same genus and not of different genra and (c) where the general object of the act is not clearly expressed and the intention of the statute is patently opposed to giving the wider meaning to the succeeding words, then alone in my opinion the meaning of the general words ought to be restricted as coloured by the preceding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1990 (HC)

Vopak Pharmaceuticals Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-05-1990

Reported in : 1991(52)ELT377(Mad)

1. the petitioner is a manufacturer of patent and proprietary medicines and drugs licence obtained in drugs act. the petitioner claims to be a small manufacturer and had been claiming exemption from payment of excise duty or concessional .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 1990 (HC)

C. Laxmi Chand and L. Hemraj Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-26-1990

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1647

..... in these proceedings to sit in judgment over the investigation. adjudication begins when investigation ends, though of course, this court is not precluded from giving suitable reliefs when there is patent violation of statutory provisions and interests of justice demands the intervention of this court. as the learned judge has pointed out, meenabai had given a complaint, which disclosed cognizable offences .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1990 (HC)

Vishnudas Trading as Vishnudas Kishindas Zarda Factory Vs. the Vazir S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-11-1990

Reported in : (1991)194MLJ1

venkataswami, j.1. these two appeals preferred under section 109(5) of the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958 (hereinafter called 'the act'), read with clause 15 of the letters patent, are directed against a common order of ramanujam, j., in a.a.o. nos. 582 and 583 of 1976, dated 11.9.1980.2. the related facts leading to the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //