Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: delhi state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc new delhi Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.080 seconds)

Jul 02 2002 (TRI)

Delhi Vidyut Board Vs. Smt. Bharto Devi

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-2002

..... a bill accordingly. according to the respondent reading 39340 was correct, which fact was verified by the inspector of the dvb. the record produced by the respondent, however, shows some patent inconsistencies, which indicated the total falsity of the case of the respondent. according to the statement on account of the complainant produced by the dvb, the meter reading in june ..... remained the same in august and october, 1999 when suddenly in december, 1999, the reading record indicated 39340. that is to say a reading of 19720 units, which is a patent absurdity and improbability keeping in view the earlier consumption of the complainant. apart from the inherent improbability, there are other circumstances on the record, which speak for themselves of the ..... patent irregularity and inaccuracy of the report made by the reading inspector and reading reader. the meter inspector stated that he visited the spot and found the meter reading was 39078 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2002 (TRI)

Jai Prakash Saini Vs. Director, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Rese ...

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Dec-23-2002

lokeshwar prasad, president: 1. the complainant, shri jai prakash saini, has filed the present complaint under section 17 of the consumer protection act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ??the act), averring therein that the complainant, an ex-serviceman, re-employed with the reserve bank of india, new delhi as a clerk-cum-coin note examiner, in august, 1997 suffered stomach ailment, consulted the medical officer of the reserve bank of india, new delhi, for treatment, who, after examining the complainant, gave treatment which provided only temporary relief to the complainant and gradually two glands on the neck and one gland on the left side of the face of the complainant appeared. the medical officer of the reserve bank of india, under whose treatment the complainant was, after a few days of medication advised the complainant to consult some surgical specialist. on the advice of the medical officer of the reserve bank of india, the complainant approached the doctor at the armed forces clinic (for short ??the afc), at new delhi, on 26th august, 1997, where a surgical specialist examined the complainant and a number of medical tests were also conducted, which included ultra sound, x-ray of full chest, urine blood, etc. it is stated that in the ultra sound report dated 1st september, 1997 some abnormal features were noticed in the abdomen and fnac report dated 29th august, 1997 diagnosed the complainant as a case of ??hodgkins disease (cancer). 2. it is stated that the above .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //