Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: gujarat Page 1 of about 1,904 results (0.008 seconds)

Jul 27 2015 (HC)

Win Plast Ltd. Vs. Symphony Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

..... cooler and is the genuine originator and the registered proprietor of the design of the above-referred model of air cooler. he tried to emphasise that the controller general of patents, design and trade mark has granted certificate of registration of the design of the aforesaid air cooler in favour of the original defendant which is produced at p. 307. 18 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2010 (HC)

Acme Pharmaceuticals Vs. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : LC2010(1)217

..... rice and gen. mills v. amar singh chawalwala, apex court without going into the merits of the controversy, expressed an opinion that the matters relating to trademarks, copy rights and patents should be finally decided very expeditiously by the trial court instead of merely granting or refusing to grant injunction. experience shows that in the matters of trademarks, copy rights and ..... patents, litigation is mainly fought between the parties about the temporary injunction and that goes on for years and years and the result is that the suit is hardly decided finally. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2008 (HC)

Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Pro Laboratories (P) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2635; LC2009(1)168

..... pre-existing common type. where the evidence indicated that the design in question were in use from long before the date, when the registration of the patent was applied for by the plaintiff, it is not possible to say that the designs were new or original and that the plaintiff was entitled to ..... infringed. the defendant appealed and it was held that the words 'new or original design not previously published in the united kingdom' in section 47 of the patents & co., act, 1883, did not require novelty in the idea of the design, but novelty in the application of the design to some article of ..... court now considers the authorities referred to and relied upon by mr.mihir thakore. (i) in the case of saunders v. wiel reported in reports of patent, design and trade mark vol x no. 4 page 29, the owner of a registered design, which was a design for the handles of spoons purporting ..... submissions the learned counsels have relied on various authorities before the court. mr.mihir thakore has relied on the judgments of;(1) saunders v. wiel reported in reports of patent, design and trade mark vol x no. 4 page 29. (2) texla metals & plastics pvt. ltd. v. anil bhasin and ors. reported in 2001 (21 ..... dated 11.3.2008 filed on behalf of the defendant wherein it is reiterated that the design applied for registration by the plaintiff to the controller of patent and design is new and original design created by the plaintiff company. that no other product, namely, d shaped tablet was available in the market .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2008 (HC)

Garware-wall Ropes Ltd. Vs. Techfab India and 5 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : LC2008(3)192

..... connection with, any such examination or investigation or any report or other proceedings consequent thereon. therefore, the legislators have very clearly and unambiguously stated that grant of a patent does not warrant any validity and, therefore, a separate provision has been provided in section 113(1) authorizing the high court in such proceedings as the present matter to ..... the gabion is fairly well established with numerous manufacturing productions, design, methodology and guidance for the gabion products.23. mr. nanavati has further submitted that rope can not be patented by any one because it is available in various forms and it varies in its strength, dimension, density, thickness, abrasion resistance, thermal stability etc. all these details are ..... more flexibility, non-corrosive, having more strength and capable to take the contour of the ground level. he has, therefore, submitted that mere challenging the validity of the patent is not sufficient for not granting of injunction. the respondent has to establish a strong case of invalidity. the respondent has failed to produce any material for establishing prior ..... 26.10.2005 and while vacating the ad-interim injunction, the learned single judge has observed that in case the respondents feel that impugned gabions are different than the patented srg invention of the appellant, the respondents were free to manufacture and sell the impugned gabions. the learned single judge has, however, directed the respondents to maintain .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2008 (HC)

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Sankarji Hemaji and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)2GLR1226

..... the kerala state electricity board, trivandrum v. t.p. kunhaliumma reported in : [1977]1scr996 ;iii. in the case of bayer aktiengesellschft of leverkusen federal republic of germany v. controller of patents, government of india reported in : air1982cal30 .iv. in the case of the state of gujarat v. patil raghav natha and ors. reported in : [1970]1scr335 andv. in the case of ..... cause of action. 27. the calcutta high court in the case of bayer aktiengesellschft of leverkusen federal republic of germany v. controller of patents, government of india reported in : air1982cal30 , while dealing with section 71 of the patents act, 1970 and article 137 of the limitation act, 1963 has also held that if any special or local law does not prescribe any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2008 (HC)

Hind Mosaic and Cement Works and anr. Vs. Shree Sahjanand Trading Corp ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : LC2008(1)402; 2008(37)PTC128(Guj)

..... irreparable loss are present in this case and, therefore, initially the trial court has rightly granted interim relief and only when the respondents have filed an application for revocation of patent, the case was transferred to this court and thereafter, the learned single judge has vacated this interim relief. by vacating this interim relief, the learned single judge has not ..... synergy. according to the appellants, learned single judge failed to consider and even refer to the expert report/certificate on record in this regard. the different elements of the patented invention are functioning in a way unknown earlier. the learned single judge failed to consider the material on record that the functionality of the wire has changed by the ..... to mislead and prejudice the court. the appellants were mainly aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the finding given by the learned single judge to the effect that the granted patent is mere combination and/or arrangement or re-arrangement or duplication of known-device/integers without there being any synergy amongst different integers and combination of known devices functioning in ..... therefore asked its representative to collect the product of respondent no. 2 from the respondent no. 1. the appellant thereby came to know that the respondents have illegally copied the patented product of the appellant. the appellants were, therefore, constrained to file suit being regular civil suit no. 1432 of 2007 in the court of learned city civil judge, ahmedabad .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2006 (HC)

Wyeth Holdings Corpn. and anr. Vs. Controller General of Patents, Desi ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2007(34)PTC1(Guj)

..... reposes confidence in the judiciary as it still maintains 'judicial discipline.'9. the office is directed to send this judgment and order to respondent no. 1 the controller general of patents, designs and trade marks for his attention and necessary action, which shall be placed on the record of this case.10. coming to the merits of the case, though it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2006 (HC)

Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2006)3GLR2204

..... thereto and other movable and immovable properties, cash in hand, cash at bank, investments, stocks, book debts (corporeal and incorporeal), tangible and intangible assets benefits, licenses, consents, authorities, registrations, patents, trade marks and powers of every kind, nature and description whatsoever, privileges, liberties, easements, advantages, benefits and approvals, contracts, deeds, schemes, bonds, agreements and other instruments and interest of ..... letters patent appeals. admittedly the letters patent appeals have been filed on 20.01.2005 wherein the appellant is shown as gujarat electricity board. the appeals are against common judgment and order dated 17 ..... filed by different companies seeking substitution of the name of the respective applicant-company in place of gujarat electricity board in the captioned special civil applications and letters patent appeals arising from respective special civil applications. the applicants herein are seeking substitution in place of the original respondents in the main petitions as well as in the ..... devoid of merits and is rejected.15. the prayer for substitution is, accordingly, allowed. the applicants are directed to amend the cause-title of the respective letters patent appeals. rule made absolute.16. registry to place a copy of this order in connected matters. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2005 (HC)

Bazley Finvest Limited

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [2005]64SCL480(Guj)

..... and all properties movable or immovable, real, corporeal or incorporeal in possession or reversion, present or contingent of whatsoever nature and whatsoever situated including in particular all licenses and liberties, patents, trade marks, ... rights and benefits of all agreements and other interest including rights and benefits under various schemes of different taxation laws as may belong to or be available to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2005 (HC)

State of Gujarat Thro Secretary Education Deptt. Vs. Somabhai Mathurbh ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [2005(106)FLR332]; (2005)2GLR1105; (2005)IIILLJ453Guj

..... in our opinion, it is of no avail to the petitioner for the simple reason that the factual profile in the present group of two letters patent appeals are quite different. in the present case, firstly, the writ petition is not filed for a long spell of 9 years. it will be ..... % backwages should follow award regardless of other special circumstances. this proposal is so vehemently urged before us by learned advocate mr. pandya in the second letters patent appeal, which cannot be accepted. in fact, there are hosts of judicial pronouncements and as propounded by case-law, the discretionary-power exercised, ordinarily should ..... services came to be terminated, which is rightly found to be not legal and valid by the learned single judge.4. upon consideration of the letters patent appeal, at the instance of the respondent-state, we find that there is no substance and, therefore, it deserves to be rejected at the admission stage ..... . again, a letters patent appeal no. 2645 of 2004 initiated at the instance of the original petitioner for a limited prayer of enhancement of the quantum of backwages, is ..... 04, at the instance of original petitioner, is also required to be dismissed at the threshold.5. in the result, both the letters patents shall stand dismissed at the admission stage. no order on civil application.6. before parting, learned advocate mr. pandya submits that the 50% .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //