Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: gujarat Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 76 results (0.005 seconds)

Dec 11 2002 (HC)

K.D. Vohra Vs. Kamleshbhai Gobarbhai Patel

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-11-2002

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1343

..... well as the rules and regulations applicable to the post and the constitutional provisions.8.1 the learned counsel who appeared for the direct recruits, who are respondents in letters patent appeal no. 485 of 2002, adopted the contentions raised by the learned advocate general, pointing out that the appointment orders of all the direct recruits have already been issued.8 ..... also submitted that many of the appellants had withdrawn their earlier petitions and tiled fresh petitions on the same cause of action, though no liberty was reserved when the letters patent appeals were disposed of, on withdrawal of those petitions. explaining the different stands taken in the affidavits filed on behalf of the state government, the learned advocate general contended that ..... work within the framework of the constitution as well as to see that, because of inaction or omission, unnecessary and avoidable litigations may not come before the court. in letters patent appeal no. 1057 of 1999 and cognate appeals, these petitioners who had appealed against the said order of the learned single judge, withdrew their petitions without reserving any liberty to ..... them in service, holding that they would be treated as surplus but not entitled to any regular salary or financial advantage.3.2 the case of the appellants of letters patent appeal no. 540, 558 to 561 of 2002 and other matters was that they were interviewed by the duly constituted staff selection committee in january, 1990 and appointed as lecturers .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2002 (HC)

Anita Bhandari Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-28-2002

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1093

..... appeal filed by the bank was required to be allowed and appeal filed by the original petitioners was required to be dismissed.16. we are exercising our jurisdiction in letters patent and considering the plight of poor widow and her minor children, we do not want to interfere with the order passed by the learned single judge awarding interim compensation. in ..... policy and sanction from union of india it was not possible for them to provide employment to petitioner no.1.8. learned counsel mr. calla for the appellants of letters patent appeal no.1173 of 2002-original petitioners vehemently submitted that in such type of cases there was no need for the appellants-petitioners to approach civil court by way of ..... the judgment and order by which full compensation not given and appointment on compassionate ground not given to petitioner no.1 herein they filed letters patent appeal no.1173 of 2002 with civil application no.9439 of 2002.7. learned counsel mr. desai for the appellant bank vehemently submitted that it was not open to the ..... the parties arriving at any settlement as may be acceptable to the parties.' 5. aggrieved of the aforesaid reliefs granted in favour of the petitioners, appellant-dena bank filed letters patent appeal no.1130 of 2002 with civil application no.8914 of 2002 for interim relief.6. the original petitioners-anita bhandari and her minor children aggrieved of the part of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2002 (HC)

Hiralal G. Siyal and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-28-2002

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1409

..... the municipality. 10. subject to the aforesaid observation and direction, the petition is not entertained at this stage.' the aforesaid order was challenged by way of an appeal, being letters patent appeal no. 466 of 2002, and the order of the learned single judge was set aside by the division bench in the letters ..... patent appeal. in the meanwhile, the respondent no. 1 furnished some documents in respect of charge no. 3 regarding stray animals, dogs and cattle as well as in connection with ground .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2002 (HC)

Anita Bhandari and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-28-2002

Reported in : 2004ACJ2020; AIR2004Guj67

..... suspicion that it was not a suicide. hence, over and above the interim compensation of rs. 2 lacs awarded by the learned single judge, the division bench in the letters patent appeal filed by the state government further directed the government to give compassionate appointment to the widow of the deceased. since in the instant case, the deceased was a customer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 2002 (HC)

Sarvagna Navinchandra Godiawala Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-24-2002

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1266

..... appellants therein unsuccessfully challenged the decision of the state government, dismissing the revision, by filing special civil application. aggrieved by the decision in the special civil application, the aforesaid letters patent appeal was filed.16. on behalf of respondent no. 3 therein, it was submitted as under :'8. on behalf of respondent no. 3, mr. a.j. patel has submitted that ..... pocketed the undue benefits pursuant to transaction of sale which is under challenge.'it is also pertinent to extract paragraphs 16 and 17 of the aforesaid judgment in the letters patent appeal :'16. mr. a.j. patel has drawn our attention to the judgment of the division bench (coram : mr. k.g. balakrishnan, c.j. & mr. justice j.n. bhatt) dated ..... 2-9-1999 in letters patent appeal no. 1153 of 1998 in special civil application no. 6265 of 1998 in the case of legal heirs of mithabhai mavjibhai v. state of gujarat. before the division bench .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-19-2002

Reported in : (2003)179CTR(Guj)266; [2003]259ITR526(Guj)

..... of development rebate. section 43a(1) itself refers to section 35(1)(iv) {capital expenditure on scientific research related to the business) and section 35a (capital expenditure on acquisition of patent rights or copy- rights) which are also one time allowances. there are many other one time allowances, but none of them is specifically excluded by the legislature except the development ..... of fluctuation in the foreign exchange rate even in case of some other one time allowances like those for scientific research under section 35(1)(iv) or for acquisition of patent rights under section 35a.43. for the aforesaid reasons, we are of the view that, with respect, the division bench in the windsor foods ltd.'s case : [1999]235itr249(guj .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2002 (HC)

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Gramercy Emerging Market Fund

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-17-2002

Reported in : [2003]116CompCas248(Guj)

..... judge decides a controversy which affects valuable rights of one of the parties, it must be treated to be a judgment within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent. accordingly to the learned senior counsel, important issues came to be decided under the impugned order and therefore, the appeal would lie against it.' 8. the learned senior counsel appearing ..... the indian companies act, 1913 (which corresponded to section 483 of the said act), it was not necessary that it must satisfy the requirements of clause 15 of the letters patent, that it should a 'judgment' within the meaning of that clause. in that case, the court was concerned with the order of confirmation of sale in course of administration where .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2002 (HC)

Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-08-2002

Reported in : (2003)1GLR158; (2003)ILLJ1066Guj

..... 1998 before this court challenging the amended notification, but the same was dismissed by the learned single judge on 11th september, 1998, against which letters patent appeal no. 1285 of 1998 is pending. however, no interim relief staying the operations was granted by this court in appeal. the history of ..... issued under section 10(1) of the act by the state government dated 3-6-1998 is directly under challenge in the aforesaid letters patent appeals pending before the division bench of this court. i am informed that before the learned single judges this challenge was mainly based on ..... to the validity of the notifications issued by the state government was pending final disposal before the division bench of this court in the letters patent appeals without approaching this court and seeking its permission.(iv) in case it is held that central government is not the 'appropriate government, qua ..... regard to the validity of the notifications issued by the state government is still not finally decided since it is the subject-matter of letters patent appeals pending before the division bench of this court, and therefore, it cannot be said that for iffco in the operations of stacking and ..... dismissed by this court [coram : h.l. gokhale, j.] by judgment dated 11th september, 1998. against the said judgment, iffco has preferred letters patent appeal no. 1281 of 1998 which is pending before the division bench for disposal. however, no interim relief has been granted in the same. similarly, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2002 (HC)

Food Corporation of India Employees' Association Vs. Food Corporation ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-30-2002

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1013

..... the norm of normal losses at 0.5%. 4. aggrieved by the aforesaid order insofar as the petitioner-union's challenges were negatived at the threshold, the petitioner preferred letters patent appeal no. 199 of 2002. by order dated 25-6-2002, the division bench left it open to the petitioner to challenge the above circular no. 3, but on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2002 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kokilaben Wd/O. Naginbhai Rameshchandr ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-25-2002

Reported in : II(2003)ACC12; 2004ACJ123; (2003)2GLR1479

..... for hire or reward by the statute is limited to rs. 10,000/- per individual passenger, and consequently, the award of the tribunal which extends to rs. 16,000/- is patently erroneous.17. the division bench, in revaben's case (supra), after considering the decision of five judges' bench of this court in first appeal nos. 1439, 1440 and 1441 of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //