Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: jharkhand Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 62 results (0.004 seconds)

Dec 17 2002 (HC)

Kishan Singh Munda and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-17-2002

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR83(Jhr)]

..... anti dated and anti timed. it has further been contended that the age of the injury as disclosed within six hours in exts. 2, 2/1 and 2/2 is patent error of record as the requisition of the io is dated 20.10.1990 forwarding pws 8, 5, 9 and 3 along with the deceased for their treatment to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2002 (HC)

Churaman Rai and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-17-2002

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR97(Jhr)]

..... two acquitted accused persons, namely, lillu rai and mishar rai inside the house and having overt act in felling the deceased on the ground and also assaulting him is a patent contradiction of the case of the prosecution as averred in the fardbeyan. from the evidence it appears that both the acquitted accused persons have no overt act in the occurrence .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2002 (HC)

Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-17-2002

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR595(Jhr)]

..... not satisfied with the judgment and order dated 15th april, 2000 passed by the learned single judge in c.w.j.c. no. 891 of 2000 (r), preferred this letters patent appeal.in a certificate case, the certificate officer rejected the objection preferred by petitioner under section 9 of the bihar & orissa public demand recovery act, 1914 (p.d.r act ..... jurisdiction of the certificate officer.the second question is, accordingly, answered in affirmative in favour of the state and against the appellant.15. i find no merit in the letters patent appeal. it is, accordingly, dismissed. however, in the facts and circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2002 (HC)

Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Jugnu Construction and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-17-2002

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR13(Jhr)]

..... residuary then there cannot be any claim on the ash or fines of the briquettes left out after the briquettes is prepared. the said judgment was affirmed in the letters patent appeal filed by the respondent. perhaps the court below while holding the prima facie case of the defendant-respondent has failed to consider the findings recorded by this court in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2002 (HC)

Raj Ceramics Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-17-2002

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR113(Jhr)]

..... , 2002 passed in l.p.a. no. 97 of 2000 (r), whereby and whereunder, the division bench while affirmed the judgment passed by the learned single judge, rejected the letters patent appeal. 2. the petitioner, a high tension insulation service consumer (h.t.i.s. for short) preferred writ petition, cwjc no. 2945 of 1998 (r) for direction on the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2002 (HC)

Tara Dutta, Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board Through Its Chairman ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-03-2002

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR341(Jhr)]

..... as 'the bseb') shall pay the benefits.3. the aforesaid judgment of the learned single judge has been challenged by both the boards i.e. jseb and bseb in letters patent appeal no. 355 of 2002 and other analogous cases. in the said case, a division bench of this court vide order dated 26th september, 2002 while passed certain directions on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2002 (HC)

Satya Narayan Pandey and Ors. and Citizens' and Cause Vs. the State of ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-03-2002

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR132(Jhr)]

..... on the subject.10. coming to the question relating to the non-fixation of any upper age limit, even as an one-time arrangement, we find that this also is patently contrary to sound public policy. it is commonly known that in all government appointments, the state fixes lower and upper age limits and that the relevant recruitment rules insist on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2002 (HC)

Anand Prakash and ors. Vs. United Bank of India and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-02-2002

Reported in : [2004(1)JCR329(Jhr)]

..... judgment and decree dated 18.8.1992. the trial court's judgment and decree was set aside and the suit was dismissed. hence, the plaintiffs have preferred the present letters patent appeal.8. the only question involved in the present appeal is as to whether on receipt, of notice under section 223 of the act, the bank was required to simply .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2002 (HC)

State of Jharkhand and Etc. Vs. Anil Sharma and Etc.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-29-2002

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1739

..... and also the case of arjun marik v. state of bihar, 1994 (2) scc 372.it has further submitted that the learned court below has totally overlooked the material infirmities patent on the face of the record and has gravely erred in coming to the finding of the guilt of the appellants. elucidating further it has been submitted that there is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2002 (HC)

Employer in Relation to Management of Balihari Colliery of Bccl Vs. th ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-29-2002

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR313; [2004(3)JCR265(Jhr)]

1. these two appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 2.5.2001, passed by the learned single judge, in cwjc nos. 423 and 451 of 2001, whereby those two writ applications were dismissed and the common award dated 23.9.1996 passed in reference case no. 134 and 135 of 1993 was not interfered with.2. the following disputes were referred in exercise of its power under section 10(1)(d) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 by the government of india, ministry of labour to the central government industrial tribunal no. 2 at dhanbad for adjudication, at the instance of the bihar mines lal jhanda mazdoor union :--'whether the demand of bihar mines lal jhanda mazdoor union for employment of sri binay kumar singh and 21 others (as per list enclosed) on the roll of balihari colliery of m/s. bccl is justified? if not, to what relief they are entitled?''whether the demand of bihar mines lal jhanda mazdoor union for employment of shri anil kr. and 22 others (as per list enclosed) on the roll of balihari colliery of m/s. bccl is justified? if so, to what relief they are entitled?'3. reference case nos. 134 and 135 of 1993 respectively were registered before the tribunal, wherein a common award dated 3rd september, 1996 was passed directing, the management of balihari colliery of m/s. bccl to regularize the concerned workmen phase wise in category 1.4. the employers in relation to the management of balihari colliery of m/s. bccl filed cwjc nos. 423 and 451 of 1997 (r) in this court .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //