Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 123 results (0.010 seconds)

Nov 27 2002 (HC)

Allied Auto Accesories Ltd. Vs. Allied Motors Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-27-2002

Reported in : 2003(3)BomCR367; 2003(27)PTC115(Bom)

..... a specification of goods has been said to a question for the consumer and not a matter to be determined by expert scientific evidence.'in a treatise entitled 'intellectual property : patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights' by w.r. cornish (third edition, first indian reprint 2001), again, it has been emphasised that the division of the trade marks register into ..... that the goods fell in class 12. that decision is final under sub-section (2) of section 8 unless the registrar has acted mechanically without any material or on a patently erroneous basis ;(vii) the question of classification is required to be answered by considering (i) the nature of the goods and the purpose and function of the goods ; (ii) the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2002 (HC)

Hydroclave System Corporation and ors. Vs. JaIn Hydraulic Pvt. Ltd. an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-29-2002

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR54; 2003(1)BomCR642; (2003)1BOMLR407; 2003(2)MhLj670

..... necessary to analyse the other materials on record to find out the answer to the third point for consideration. 19. the fact of registration of the patent in favour of the appellants in canada is not in dispute. merely because the number thereof is not disclosed, it would not make any difference, when ..... was designed by the plaintiffs. another finding which has been arrived at by the court below is to the effect that the plaintiffs claim that the patent is registered in canada but no registration number is given and that they have applied for registration in india but it is pending and yet to be ..... is the case of the respondents that 'hydroclave' is a technology or process or method of infectious waste treatment and since it is a technology, no patent can be claimed for the same. the term 'hydroclave' is a descriptive or generic term. the respondents have manufactured a machine which is having a totally ..... the appellant no. 1 - company by inventing a new technology and process for sterilising bio-medical waste and the said machine has global acceptance and their patent has been registered in canada and they have applied for registration thereof in india in 1998 and is still pending for disposal. 'hydroclave' is also their ..... mark cases vol. lvii (no. 6) page 137, and british vacuum cleaner company ltd. v. new vacuum cleaner company ltd., reported in reports of patent, design and trade mark cases. vol. xxiv, no. 28, page 641. 28. the decision in jeryl lynn trade mark's case (supra) was on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2002 (TRI)

Mds Switchgear Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-20-2002

Reported in : (2002)LC608Tri(Mum.)bai

..... this contention of the departmental representative. clause 1.2 of the agreement defines "know-how" to mean and include "all inventions processes, patents, engineering and manufacturing skills and other technical information, whether patented or unpatented and whether or not patentable which are freely owned by ec (italian company) on the date hereof and which is necessary in the reasonable opinion of ec to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2002 (HC)

ipca Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Savita Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-26-2002

Reported in : 2002(6)BomCR696; 2002(4)MhLj407

..... the said right shall vest and alwaysdeemed to be vested with ipca.' at this stage it would be sufficient only tonotice that neither of the clauses mentions that thetrade marks, patents or processes belonged to theplaintiff.schedule ii to the agreement with 'gelsules'sets out 'appetone'...multivitamin capsules', as oneof the products to be manufactured. schedule ii tothe agreement with the ..... thepurpose of manufacturing and packing the products.clauses 4(xii) and 6(c) read as under :4(xii)'not to claim any right to or underany of the trade marks, patents or processesconnected with any of the products ormanufacture and/or sell any products under atrade mark connected with the products orunder a name phonetically or otherwise similarto trade names connected .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2002 (HC)

Nandkumar Nivrutti Baptiwale Vs. Automotive Research Association of In ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-11-2002

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR110; 2002(4)BomCR231; (2002)2BOMLR460; 2002(2)MhLj191

..... , acquiring, and lending any articles and things in the ordinary course of his business for profit and otherwise under any licence or permission in respect of any discovery, invention and patents resulting from the work of the association. 85. if upon the winding up or dissolution of the association there remains, after the satisfaction of all its debt and liabilities any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2002 (HC)

Sub Divisional Engineer Vs. Sudhakar Bapurao Bhagat

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-20-2002

Reported in : 2003(4)BomCR803; [2003(97)FLR1130]; (2003)IILLJ786Bom; 2003(2)MhLj628

..... the light of the said finding, in our opinion,the learned single judge could not have awarded anamount of compensation of rs. 25,000/- to therespondent-workman. 9. the letters patent appeal, therefore,deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. theorder passed by the learned single judge, directing theappellant to pay the amount of rs. 25,000/- towardscompensation, is hereby ..... . 25,000/- was ordered to be paid to theworkman by the appellant and it may not be interfered bythis court. 8. having heard the learned counsel, in ouropinion, the letter patent appeal deserves to beallowed. once it has been held by the labour court andconfirmed by the learned single judge that no illegalityhad been committed by the appellant-state, interminating the ..... .75, as offered to him in 1987. let the saidamount of rs. 2310.75 be paid to the respondent-workmanwithin a period of four weeks from today. 10. the letters patent appeal is accordinglyallowed with no order as to costs. in view of the orderpassed in the letter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2002 (HC)

Voltas Employees Union Vs. Voltas Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-20-2002

Reported in : 2003(3)BomCR533; [2002(93)FLR731]; (2003)IILLJ31Bom

..... order of the industrial court dated august 10, 1999 in so far as it directed the employer not to execute and implement the voluntary retirement scheme of 1999. the letters patent appeal filed by the union against the said order of this court was rejected.3. on june 18, 1999, the employer displayed a notice suspending temporarily the second shift operation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2002 (HC)

Shri Jos Peter Dsouza Vs. Mr. Vilas P. Thali,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-20-2002

Reported in : AIR2003Bom231; 2003(4)BomCR228

..... been paid. thesaid mistake therefore requires to becorrected and which the respondentno. 1 will correct'.in para 29, it is stated that as regards writpetition no. 93/2002 in letters patent appeal no. 7/2002,the respondent no. 1 had appeared along with the learnedadvocate general as was required. as regards civilapplication no. 224/2002 in writ petition no. 325/2001 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2002 (HC)

Manoj Bhaskarao Karnik Vs. City of Nagpur Corporation and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-18-2002

Reported in : 2003(4)MhLj17

..... and on the other hand came to the conclusion that the process of selection got vitiated on account of alleged irregularity and illegality. in our considered opinion, the division bench patently committed an error in relying upon the report of the commission and in recording a finding that irregularities have been committed in the selection notwithstanding the fact that the said ..... advertised were only 161 but appointments were made far in excess of the number of posts advertised. he submitted that any appointment made in excess of the posts advertised is patently illegal. he placed heavy reliance on the decisions of the supreme court in state of bihar and anr. v. madan mohan singh and ors. (1994) 3 scc 308, ashok kumar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2002 (HC)

Harinarayan G. Bajaj Vs. Sharedeal Financial Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-13-2002

Reported in : AIR2003Bom296; 2003(2)ARBLR359(Bom); 2003(4)BomCR139; 2003(2)MhLj598

..... said judgment except to quote the following paragraph from the said judgment:--'that the model law was only taken into account in the drafting of the said act is, therefore, patent. the act and the model law are not identically drafted. under section 11 the appointment of an arbitrator, in the event of a party to the arbitration agreement failing to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //