Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 154 results (0.009 seconds)

Nov 30 2005 (HC)

Joint Cit, Vs. Essar Oil Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2005

Reported in : [2006]7SOT216(NULL)

..... permanent establishment to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents or other rights, or by way of commission, for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by way of interest on monies ..... permanent establishment to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents or other rights, or by way of commission for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by way of interest on monies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2005 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Hinditron Services (P.) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Reported in : (2006)99ITD479(Mum.)

..... or incorporeal. though it does not always mean physical property but it does mean the right, title, interest in a property. property also includes rights such as trade marks, copyrights, patents and even intellectual rights capable of transfer or transmission. they also include beneficial rights to a thing considered as having money value especially with reference to transfer/succession and their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2005 (TRI)

The D.C.i.T. (Osd), Range 7(2) Vs. Saraf Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2005

Reported in : (2006)102ITD356(Mum.)

..... supreme court decision in the case of ciba (india) ltd. 69 itr 692. it was held in this case that any expenditure incurred for obtaining the right to use the patents and trademarks for a limited period is to be considered as an expenditure of revenue nature. the ld.cit(a) has then referred to the supreme court decision in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2005 (TRI)

Metchem Canada Inc. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-30-2005

Reported in : (2006)100ITD251(Mum.)

..... the pe to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents, know-how or other rights, or by way of commission or other charges, for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by ..... the pe to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents, know-how or other rights, or by way of commission or other charges for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2005 (HC)

Hawkins Cookers Ltd. Vs. Zaverchand Liladhar Shah and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-29-2005

Reported in : 2005(31)PTC129(Bom)

..... motion no. 3031 of 1994 and the said motion has been dismissed.5. in the aforesaid premises, the petitioners have filed the present petition under section 51a of the indian patent and designs act, 1911 inter alia seeking cancellation of the registered design of the respondent no. 1. the ground on which the said cancellation is sought is that the petitioners ..... two designs side by side, but also apart, and a little distance away,' mr. blanco while has also reiterated similar propositions of law in his work 'patents for propositions of law in his work 'patents for inventions' (3rd edition) at page 265 where the learned author has said:'the existence or not of substantial novelty or originality is a question of fact .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2005 (TRI)

Arco Whitey Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-17-2005

Reported in : (2006)(193)ELT217Tri(Mum.)bai

..... purchased the manufacturing unit as a 'going concern' with all its assets, including the goodwill, right to use the trade mark and all technical drawing and designs and know-how, patents, licenses etc. in consideration of rs. 107.00 lakhs. as such, it is their contention that with effect from 28.03.94, the trade mark belongs to them and has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. P and B Laboratories Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-23-2005

Reported in : (2006)(105)ECC29

..... ) of vitamin b1, b6 and b12 under brand name aneudox-12 and classified the same under chapter sub-heading 3003.00 of the first schedule to the ceta, 1985 as patent of propriety of medicaments in their classification declaration. whereas the department wanted the classification under chapter sub-heading 2936.00 as the appellants were mis-declared the same as medicaments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2005 (HC)

Girish J. Bobade Vs. Ajay Thakur and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-22-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR381; 2006(2)MhLj702

..... section 20 of the family courts act, the act has an overriding effect, notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained in any other law. the full bench considered the provisions of the letters patent and concluded that when the high court exercises its ordinary original civil jurisdiction in relation to the matters under the family courts act, it would be considered as a district .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 2005 (HC)

Shri Filipe Nery Rodrigues, Member of the Legislative Assembly of Goa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-21-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR424; (2006)108BOMLR227

..... senior counsel submitted that the tribunal examined the evidence in a perverse manner and drew the conclusions which, on the face of it, are erroneous. this would, obviously is a patent perversity in appreciation of evidence by the tribunal and rendering the conclusion based on such perverse appreciation of evidence, is not only absurd but totally perverse. in order to substantiate ..... to file reply, in our view, cannot even remotely be considered to be reasonable. on the other hand, it is wholly unreasonable and the interim order is, therefore, passed in patent violation of the principles of natural justice and hurry in which it is passed shows the oblique motive which renders the interim order mala fide. 54. so far as applicability .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2005 (HC)

Kamal D/O Bansidhar Ghatol Vs. Sawate Education Society and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR64; 2006(2)MhLj675

..... pay-scale of rs. 200-450/- (revised rs. 1500-2640/-) a learned single judge of the punjab and haryana high court and answered the question in the affirmative. the letters patent bench has upheld the judgment of the learned single judge. this appeal by way of special leave was against the judgments of the high court. said question is answered in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //