Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Year: 2005 Page 16 of about 154 results (0.009 seconds)

Feb 01 2005 (HC)

Villa Moda General Trading Co. W.L.L. and anr. Vs. Chordia Fashions Pv ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-01-2005

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR41

..... , the defendant proceeds on the assumption that all facts pleaded by the plaintiff are true and correct. this exception of course, would be limited when the same facts are so patently wrong or incorrect that no reasonable person is likely to believe in their existence. 4. since the defendant had chosen to proceed by way of demurrer to oppose the ad .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2005 (TRI)

The Morarjee Goculdas Spg. and Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-28-2005

..... could not have claimed any depreciation allowance and, in that case there would not have been any allegation of undisclosed income. thus, on the facts of the case it was patent that entries in the books of accounts or other documents or transactions were bound to be disclosed for the purpose of income-tax act or else the proceedings in question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2005 (TRI)

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Chadbourne and Parke Llp

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-25-2005

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Mum.)734

..... of a literary, artistic, or scientific work, including cinematograph films or work on film, tape or other means of reproduction for use in connection with radio or television broadcasting, any patent, trademark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience, including gains derived from the alienation of any such right or property .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2005 (TRI)

Siemens Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-06-2005

Reported in : (2005)(99)ECC449

..... of customs, mumbai vide other orders dated 25^th september 1991 and 31^st july 1998, respectively finalised the valuations after detailed study.the appellants are not paying any royalty, patent fee, license fees, know-how fees or any other payment for the products being manufactured in their existing manufacturing unit and there has been no change in the circumstances that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //