Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Year: 2005 Page 2 of about 154 results (0.009 seconds)

Dec 06 2005 (HC)

Gebi Bapuji Banjari (Yerwal) Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-06-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR348; 2006(2)MhLj697

..... will manifest their intention. therefore, the protest against the award of the collector is implied notwithstanding the acceptance of compensation. the district judge and the high court, therefore, fell into patent error in denying the enhanced compensation to the appellants.the learned counsel, therefore, submitted that in view of this decision of the apex court, there should be no doubt about .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2005 (HC)

Mahindra and Mahindra Limited Vs. Sunil Yeshwant Pandit and Shri P.S. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2005

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR261; 2006(1)BomCR38; [2006(109)FLR47]; (2006)IILLJ363Bom

..... in its view taking back the 1st respondent will give a wrong signal in a case of dishonesty and will affect discipline. 26. in the circumstances, the letters patent appeal will have to be allowed and also the writ petition thereby dismissing the reference which the 1st respondent-workman had filed in the labour court. 27. we are ..... consent. the division bench, with a view to avoid further delay, has asked the labour court to record the evidence and give its findings while keeping this letters patent appeal alive. this has been done by consent. if this approach was not to be adopted the lpa could have been disposed of at that stage by passing ..... dismissed the writ petition by the impugned judgment and order dated 10th/11th january 2002. 10. it is this judgment and order which is assailed in the present letters patent appeal. it was submitted on behalf of the appellant-company that the view taken by the learned single judge was not correct. in a case where the enquiry is ..... with continuity in service and full back wages from the date of dismissal i.e. 31.1.1986 till reinstatement. 2. the relevant facts leading to this letters patent appeal are as follows:-the appellant is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing jeep-type vehicles and tractors amongst other products. the appellant has one of its ..... h.l. gokhale, j.1. this letters patent appeal seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 10th/11th january 2002 rendered by a learned single judge of this court in writ petition no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2005 (TRI)

Cybertech Systems and Software Ltd. Vs. Assistant Cit, Range 8(1)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2005

Reported in : (2006)7SOT230(Mum.)

..... of consulting services, whether or not ... and all related intellectual property rights, know how.... mask works, trademarks, formulae, procession, manufacturing techniques, trade secrets, ideas, artwork, software or other copyrightable or patentable work.y2k compliant - shall mean with respect of sof tware, systems, cons ulting services and deliverables that the same shall not be affected adversely by the occurrence of use of ..... etc.(4) developing documentation such as implementation methodology, project documentation etc.(5) design of networking and internetworking systems architecture, estimations, networking diagrams etc." the assessee is obliged to grant the patent right as provided in articles 4.1 and 4.2 in relation to all software programme undertaken by virtue of the agreement. having regard to all these, it cannot be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2005 (HC)

Joint Cit, Vs. Essar Oil Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2005

Reported in : [2006]7SOT216(NULL)

..... permanent establishment to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents or other rights, or by way of commission, for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by way of interest on monies ..... permanent establishment to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents or other rights, or by way of commission for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by way of interest on monies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2005 (HC)

Kishorekumar Mohanlal Kothari Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR675; 2006(3)BomCR842; 2006(2)MhLj591

..... . the apex court observed that protest against the award of the collector is implied notwithstanding acceptance of the compensation. therefore, the district judge and the high court, therefore, fell into patent error in denying the enhanced compensation to the appellants. that where the claimants receiving without protest the compensation awarded by the collector, it is held that they are not merely .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2005 (HC)

Tulsabai W/O Narayanrao Deshpande (Died) Through L.R. Madhavrao Naraya ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR144; 2006(2)MhLj219

..... mesne profits as accruing from the period commencing three years preceding the institution of the suit until the delivery of possession.25. we, therefore, allow the letters patent appeal. however, in the facts of the case, there would be no order as to costs.26. after pronouncement of the judgment, the counsel appearing on ..... is followed by this court in the case of tata press ltd. v. mtnl reported in : air1995bom107 to hold that in an appeal under the letters patent, the court is entitled to go into all findings of fact. even otherwise, in the instant case, we had an opportunity to deal not only with ..... the limitations on the power of the court imposed by sections 100 and 101 civil procedure code cannot be made applicable to an appellate court hearing a letters patent appeal for the simple reason that single judge of the high court is not a court subordinate to the high court.the decision of the apex court ..... , in spite of execution of tamliknama, the plaintiff was entitled to succeed.7. the dismissal of first appeal no. 151 of 1976 gave rise to this letters patent appeal. we heard the appeal for quite a number of days with the able assistance from learned senior counsel shri p. r. deshmukh, learned senior counsel shri ..... the judgment of a single judge in the first appeal is not limited and observed thus :the power of a division bench hearing a letters patent appeal under clause 10 from the judgment of a single judge in first appeal is not limited only to a question of law under section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2005 (TRI)

Yucca Finvest (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Reported in : (2006)101ITD403(Mum.)

..... commissioner of income-tax (appeals) ought to have borne in mind the general commercial principles in order to arrive at the real and true profits of the business. it is patently unfair and unjust to expect an assessee who has incurred a loss in his business during the year to pay tax on the dividend income earned by him particularly when .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2005 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Hinditron Services (P.) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Reported in : (2006)99ITD479(Mum.)

..... or incorporeal. though it does not always mean physical property but it does mean the right, title, interest in a property. property also includes rights such as trade marks, copyrights, patents and even intellectual rights capable of transfer or transmission. they also include beneficial rights to a thing considered as having money value especially with reference to transfer/succession and their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Mecnair Exports Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-18-2005

..... has not given any finding in regard to liability of the goods to confiscation but determined the quantum of penalty on the applicants. this according to the applicants is a patent error on the part of the tribunal. it is also submitted that when the tribunal remanded the matter it should have directed the lower authority to re-determine the penalty .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2005 (HC)

Chotelal Ramkaran Yadav Vs. Municipal Corporation for Gr. Mumbai

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-17-2005

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR261; 2006(1)MhLj873

..... (first appeal nos. 30 to 32 of 2001) were dismissed by a learned single judge (r.m.s. khandeparkar, j.) on 29th january, 2002. the plaintiffs aggrieved thereupon preferred letters patent appeals in which an order was passed by a division bench granting liberty to the appellants to file fresh suits after joining the owners of the property and after issuing .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //