Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Year: 2005 Page 5 of about 154 results (0.008 seconds)

Sep 23 2005 (HC)

Mr. A.R. Khan Construwell and Co. Vs. Youth Education and Welfare Soci ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-23-2005

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR511; 2006(1)BomCR170; (2005)107BOMLR231; 2006(2)MhLj595

h.l. gokhale, j.1. these three lpas are concerned with an immovable property of the first respondent bearing survey no. 643-b corresponding to cts no. 614-b or final plot no. 127 and ptr no. f/1892/at nasik admeasuring 40 gunthas which is a charitable trust registered under the bombay public trusts act 1950 (for brevity the act is referred to hereinafter or the bpt act). the first respondent trust has obtained the said property upon transfer from a previous trust anjuman khairul islam to whom it was transferred by one muslim education society, nashik which was granted the said property under a state government sanad dated 9th february, 1934. as per the terms of the sanad a structure consisting of 12 rooms has been constructed. the property was required to be used as a hostel for muslim boys. 2. the said muslim education society, nashik was dissolved under a resolution passed on 29th july, 1973 under which its properties came to be transferred to one anjuman c. khairul islam, bombay with the consent of the then charity commissioner and this trust later on transferred it to respondent no. 1 in july, 1989 as per the previous permission and consent of the then charity commissioner dated 24th november, 1988. 3. the objects of the first respondent trust are educational. they include maintaining schools, colleges, hostels, libraries, educational institutions for technical, pharmaceutical, medical, polytechnical and agricultural courses, to award scholarship to deserving students, to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2005 (TRI)

Essar Oil Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-2005

Reported in : (2006)102TTJ(Mum.)614

..... of the term 'international traffic'. only where the ship is operated 'solely' between places in the other contracting state it looses the character of ship in 'international traffic'. this is patent from the language of the definition of 'international traffic'.14. shri mehta relied on the commentary brought out by philip baker in "double taxation convention and international tax law" in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2005 (HC)

The Brihan Maharashtra Sugar Syndicate, a Company Incorporated Under t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-2005

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR739; 2006(2)BomCR103; 2006(1)MhLj344; 2006(33)PTC188(Bom)

..... case of the plaintiffs. there is no resemblance whatsoever between the two labels excepting the background colour orange. in view of this matter, the judgment of the trial court is patently wrong. the findings of the trial court on vital issues nos. 6, 7 and 8 are perverse, these findings are set aside. issue nos. 11, 12 and 13 are required .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2005 (HC)

National Textile Corporation (Sm) Ltd. Vs. Devraj Chandrabali Pai

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-19-2005

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR494; 2006(1)BomCR765

..... that those litigants who mention articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india in the cause title of their petition had a remedy of letters patent appeal and those who do not so mention loose the remedy. the necessary corollary being conferral of this right to choose the forum and remedy of ..... courts under the high court act, 1861. however in so far as the high court of judicature at bombay is concerned the charter of the letters patent of 1865 specifically conferred the power to issue writs in this court. but this power was territorially limited. this limitation seriously impaired supervisory jurisdiction which the ..... to be read in place of section 107 of the government of india act, 1919. so read no appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent is maintainable against an order made under article 227 of the constitution. it was in the light of this legal position that several judgments of the ..... industrial court was maintained. it is this order dated 18.8.2004 which is questioned in this appeal filed under clause 15 of the bombay letters patent appeal.5. at the outset the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant was asked to establish the maintainability of this appeal in view of ..... order passed by the learned single judge of this court on 18.8.2004 the appellant has preferred this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent appeal of this high court of judicature at bombay. facts giving rise to this appeal stated briefly are as under:2. the national textile corporation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 2005 (HC)

Unique Pharmaceutical Laboratories Vs. Stalco Freight International Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-09-2005

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR134; II(2006)BC459; 2005(6)BomCR829

..... even if the defendant carries on business then that court can have a concurrent jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit whether as per clause 12 of the letters patent or section 20 of the civil procedure code. in both the cases, the court at uae will have at least a concurrent jurisdiction because the defendant carries on business at uae. thus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2005 (HC)

Ms. Khushi Harkishan Malhotra Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-08-2005

Reported in : 2006CriLJ612

..... is in a position to substantiate the said allegation.9. the learned p.p. submitted that the allegations which are made in the writ petition no. 1710 of 2005 are patently false. he relied upon the affidavit of one dilip vana hivrale who is at present district welfare and child welfare officer. he was working as the superintendent of navjeevan mahila .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2005 (HC)

Atul Medical Vs. Cadila Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-06-2005

Reported in : III(2006)BC204; 2005(6)BomCR21; 2005(4)MhLj925

..... application for temporary injunction was made which was rejected. an appeal from order was preferred by the petitioner in this court which was dismissed. on 3/5/1999, the letters patent appeal filed by the petitioner was admitted by this court and the civil application for stay came to be disposed of with a direction that the petitioner should deposit an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2005 (HC)

Shri Vijay C. Puljal Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-05-2005

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR481; (2005)107BOMLR983; [2005]128CompCas196(Bom); 2005(4)CTC705; 2005(4)MhLj5; [2005]64SCL589(Bom)

..... for the high court of australia in bank of new south wales v. the commonwealth, 1947 48 clr 76, traced the origin of the doctrine from 'pith and marrow' in patent law. the learned judge noted thus: '... the phrase 'pith and substance ... is a metaphorical phrase possibly derived from 'pith and marrow' in ..... patent law. wills j. in incandescent gas light co. v. de mare incandescent gas light system ltd. (3) said of the latter phrase :- ' 'pith' is a great deal less than the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 2005 (HC)

Ghanshyam S/O Ramcharan Amghe and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-02-2005

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR122; 2006(3)BomCR479; 2005(4)MhLj1142

..... c.s. no. 42, is bound to have such overriding effect on the earlier notification dt. 14-5-1963 under section 6 of the l.a. act, because of its patent inconsistency and consequently the latter becomes ineffective to the extent of such 41,396 sq.metres. it is this inconsistency and consequential partial invalidity that have driven the authorities acting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2005 (HC)

Arvind Bhaskar Limaye, Through His Power of Attorney Shri Prakash V. D ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-01-2005

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR708; 2006(1)BomCR185; 2006(3)MhLj5

..... submitted that therefore the award which was passed by the reference court in respect of the damages which were awarded at the rate of rs.150/- p.s.m. was patently without jurisdiction and therefore the award was liable to be quashed and set aside. findings and conclusion: 6. in support of his claim, which was filed in the reference application .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //