Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Year: 2005 Page 7 of about 154 results (0.022 seconds)

Jul 29 2005 (HC)

Hawkins Cookers Ltd. Vs. Zaverchand Liladhar Shah and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-29-2005

Reported in : 2005(31)PTC129(Bom)

..... motion no. 3031 of 1994 and the said motion has been dismissed.5. in the aforesaid premises, the petitioners have filed the present petition under section 51a of the indian patent and designs act, 1911 inter alia seeking cancellation of the registered design of the respondent no. 1. the ground on which the said cancellation is sought is that the petitioners ..... two designs side by side, but also apart, and a little distance away,' mr. blanco while has also reiterated similar propositions of law in his work 'patents for propositions of law in his work 'patents for inventions' (3rd edition) at page 265 where the learned author has said:'the existence or not of substantial novelty or originality is a question of fact .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2005 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Jasubhai Business Service (P)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-29-2005

Reported in : (2006)100TTJ(Mum.)951

..... in its own line of business, (ii) the appellant was required to keep the process, technical know-how confidential and secret and non-partibility and was not to seek any patent for the process. thus, the assessee did not become owner of any process or technical know-how in its own right. the expenditure was thus for use and not for ..... in large scale manufacture of penicillin for a period of two years. the appellant was to keep the technical know-how confidential and secret and was not to seek any patent for the process. for the asst. yr. 1964-65, the appellant claimed deduction of the sum of rs. 2,39,625 as a revenue expenditure. both the department and the ..... trademark of the above journals and know-how for editorial content which is very prime for the journal. it was argued that the amount was paid not for acquiring any patent, right or copyright covered under section 35a and the amount was paid for acquiring the running business for use of trade name of the journal with existing rights of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2005 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Commissioner of Customs Vs. Hoganas I ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-2005

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR61; 2006(199)ELT8(Bom)

..... application had, therefore been rejected not only under sub-section (1-a) but also under sub-section (1). the submission has only to be stated to be rejected. it is patent from para 7.1, which we have quoted, that the only reason for not proceeding with the applications was the objection raised by the commissioner under sub-section (1-a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2005 (HC)

Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-2005

Reported in : 2006(201)ELT529(Bom)

..... application had, therefore been rejected not only under sub-section (1-a) but also under sub-section (1). the submission has only to be stated to be rejected. it is patent from para 7.1, which we have quoted, that the only reason for not proceeding with the applications was the objection raised by the commissioner under sub-section (1-a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2005 (HC)

Chandrakant Devu Shinde Vs. Director, Chhatrapati Shahu Central Instit ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-2005

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR616]

..... with persons who are looking for help for rehabilitation or for restoring the normal marital life. under these circumstances, the view taken by the industrial court cannot be termed as patently erroneous so as to call for interference under the supervisory powers of this court under article 227 of the constitution. the finding that, the petitioner was not a 'workman' within ..... .d. act by the labour court but the same view was set aside by the learned single judge of the high court. however, the division bench while entertaining the letters patent appeal set aside the judgment of the learned single judge and restored the award passed by the labour court for reinstatement. the supreme court referred to its earlier decisions in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2005 (HC)

Hotel Rosalia Pvt. Ltd. by Its Managing Director, R.N. Bhate Vs. G.B. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-18-2005

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR73; 2005(3)MhLj993

..... cannot claim protection and a decree for eviction must follow. the court has no discretion in the matter. the reasoning given by the appellate court, therefore, are clearly perverse and patently unreasonable and need to be interfered with under article 227 of the constitution. after receipt of the notice of termination under section 12(2) on the ground of arrears of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2005 (TRI)

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-15-2005

..... of such tax free income plus charges paid to the mutual fund as a business loss against the assessee's other business income chargeable to tax. these were the transactions patently to avoid tax with the complicity of the mutual fund. the manner in which the mutual fund promised to the whole world payment of 40% tax free dividend irrespective of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2005 (TRI)

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-15-2005

Reported in : (2005)96ITD1(Mum.)

..... equivalent of such tax free income plus charges paid to the mutual fund as a business loss against the assessees other business income chargeable to tax. these were the transactions patently to avoid tax with the complicity of the mutual fund. the manner in which the mutual fund promised to the whole world payment of 40% tax free dividend irrespective of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2005 (HC)

Pundlik Chingalaba Kaje Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-13-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR684; 2006(1)BomCR368

..... would be in accordance with rule 5 as interpreted by this court in a judgement dated 2.5.2001 in (shri suresh ramchandra palande v. shri balasaheb manik farate) letters patent appeal no. 175 of 1997. therefore, according to the learned counsel, mandamus must issue directing the collector to consider the change of name.6. mr. jahagirdar, the learned counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2005 (HC)

P.M. Ghare and ors. Vs. Jaysynth Anthraquinone Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2005

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR45; [2005(107)FLR1132]; (2006)ILLJ388Bom; 2005(4)MhLj782

..... in the two appeals are filed by individuals who are employees of the 1st respondent-company. through these civil applications, leave is sought to file and prosecute the two letters patent appeals. the applications have become necessary since the applicants are desirous of challenging the common order passed by a learned single judge (dr. d.y. chandrachud, j.) in two writ .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //