Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 978 results (0.009 seconds)

Sep 13 2013 (HC)

Smt Champa and ors Vs. Roop Lal

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the indian trusts act, 1882 (act no. ii of 1882), the companies act, 1956 (act no. i of 1956). the designs act, 1911 (act no. ii of 1911) or the patents act, 1970 (act no. 39 of 1970) is pending, may with the sanction of the chief justice, obtain the assistance of one or more other judges for the hearing and ..... the indian trusts act, 1882 (act no. ii of 1882). the company act, 1956 (act no. i of 1956), the designs act, 1911 (act no. ii of 1911) or the patents act, 1970 (act no. 39 of 1970); (vi) a reference under section 243 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 (act not iii of 1955); (vii) a case or proceeding under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2013 (HC)

Lalit Shanker Vs. Smt,sunder Bai

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... . 177/2012. lalit shanker vs. smt. sunder bai // 16 // 1882), the companies act, 1956 (act no. i of 1956), the designs act, 1911 (act no. ii of 1911) or the patents act, 1970 (act no. 39 of 1970); (vi) a reference under section 243 of the rajasthan tenancy act,1955 (act no. iii of 1955); (vii) a case or proceeding under ..... the indian trusts act, 1882 (act no. ii of 1882), the companies act, 1956 (act no. i of 1956), the designs act, 1911 (act no. ii of 1911) or the patents act, 1970 (act no. 39 of 1970) is pending, may with the sanction of the chief justice, obtain the assistance of one or more other judges for the hearing and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2009 (HC)

J.K. Cement Works and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2009(3)WLN35

..... jksl and jkcl is as a 'going concern' on as-is-where-is-basis free from encumbrances which inter-alia includes all fixed assets, current assets, intangible assets, all rights, patents, trade mark, mining lease etc. and all current liabilities including trade deposits, workers' dues, contingent liabilities and all litigation with respect to the cement undertaking.4. he further pointed out .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2008 (HC)

Dr. Shishupal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(4)Raj3689

ordergovind mathur, j.1. to be considered for appointment as professor (mba) at engineering college, bikaner, the petitioner appeared before a competent selection committee on 3.4.2007, however, the recommendation of such committee was not placed before the executive committee of the college, hence this petition for writ is preferred seeking directions as follows:i. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may be directed to place the recommendations of the selection committee for the post of professor in mba department undertaken pursuant to the advertisement dated 4.1.2007 before the executive council of the engineering college bikaner for consideration forthwith or within such time as this hon'ble court may deem fir to prescribe;ii. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the event, the petitioner is recommended and approved for appointment, the respondents may be directed to offer appointment to the petitioner on the post of professor in mba department with effect from the date the other persons selected pursuant to the advertisement dated 4.1.2007 have been given such appointment with all consequential benefits.2. in reply to the writ petition the respondents came forward with the stand that the petitioner is not possessing the eligibility to hold the post of professor (mba) as per the norms prescribed by all india council of technical education (hereinafter referred to as 'the aicte'), thus, the recommendation made by the selection committee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2007 (HC)

R.S.R.T.C. and Etc. Etc. Vs. Vaibhav Kumar and ors. Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2008ACJ473; AIR2007Raj147; RLW2007(4)Raj3022

..... pillai sreedharan pillai air 2004 kerala 111, respectively and accepted the legal position expostulated therein that the right of appeal available under the letters patent is taken away by section 100a of the code of civil procedure even in respect of the matter arising under special enactments having force of ..... law. that was a case where letters patents appeal was preferred from the order of a single judge passed in an appeal under section 173 of the motor vehicles act. the full ..... case of gandla pannala bhulaxmi v. aprtc and anr. , was seized with the question whether the right of appeal available under the letters patent is taken away by section 100a of the civil procedure code in respect of the matter arising under special enactments or other instruments having the force of ..... the civil procedure code was substituted. the said provision reads as follows:section 100a : no further appeal in certain cases:- notwithstanding anything contained in any letters patent for any high court in any other instrument having the force of law or in any other law for the time being in force,a) ..... effect from 1st february, 1977. the section so introduced reads thus:100a. no further appeal in certain cases.--notwithstanding anything contained in any letters patent for any high court or in any other instrument having the force of law in any other law for the time being in force where .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2006 (HC)

Santosh Devi and ors. Vs. Ramesh Kumar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2007(34)PTC219(Raj)

..... for the house of lords, describing the nature of the property in trade mark said:the right of property in a trademark had special characteristics. one, which is shared with patents and with copyright, was that it was a monopoly, that is to say, it was a right to restrain other persons from using the mark. but it was an adjunct .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2003 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Foss Electronic

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2003)182CTR(Raj)542; [2003]263ITR125(Raj)

..... reads as under : '(4) licensee wishes to enter into an agreement with foss for the purchase of technical information and technical assistance relating to milko-tester minor, including licenses under patents relating thereto, owned or controlled by foss. in particular, licensee intends to manufacture the milko-tester minor in phases mutually agreed upon and approved by the government of india.' 11 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2002 (HC)

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. R.C. Misra and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj155; 2003(1)WLN371

..... act, procedure provided in section 98 had to be adopted. this position is reflected in following statement after explaining the meaning of term letters patent:'different letters patents have been handed down by the sovereign in british india to chartered high courts which included only judicature for bengal, madras, bombay, north west ..... this act had become obsolete, redundant and was no longer required to be on the statute book. for the repeal of bombay high court (letters patent) act, 1866, it was stated that this act was introduced to correct two clerical errors and subsequently, by virtue of amendments made in 1948, ..... of kerala high court happen to be travancore cochin high court and not the madras high court. therefore, even on analogy, provision in letters patent of madras high court relating to making of a reference to a larger bench or to a third judge in the contingency as was before ..... court as on the date of coming into force the constitution of india or after appointed day under state reorganisation act, 1956 nor the letters patent of a chartered high court handed over by british govt. or an, enactment made by other competent legislative authority, were under consideration before the ..... circumstances, the question before the supreme court in hemlatha's case was firstly whether kerala high court was a high court governed by the letters patent within the meaning of sub-section (3) of section 98 cpc, which would make section 98 cpc inapplicable to the situation which has arisen .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2002 (HC)

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Etc. Vs. Smt. Pushpa Devi and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2003Raj63; 2003(2)WLN28

..... courts which included only judicature for bengal, madras. bombay. north west provinces (allahabad) and other like patna, lahore. rangoon. but no letters patent was handed over to the high court of state of rajasthan as neither, the state of rajasthan nor its high court was in existence when the ..... thereupon called writs close, literate clause and are recorded in the close-rolls, in the same manner as the orders are in the patent rolls.35. different letters patents have handed clown by the sovereign in british india to chartered high courts which included only judicature for bengal, madras, bombay. north ..... court as intra court appeal in the following circumstances :(i) as per the specific provisions contained in rajasthan high court ordinance:(ii) or letters patent act that were existing prior to commencement of the constitutionunder article 225.(iii) once an appeal reaches the high court, it has to be ..... bench. therefore, filing of appeal intra court within the high court as per the specific provisions contained in rajasthan high court ordinance or letters patent act that were existing prior to commencement of the constitution under article 225, would not alter the nature of decree passed by either of ..... the question raise by the court was in the following terms:'the question is whether remedy of intra court appeal provided under relevant letters patent or high court ordinance cases to be available in view of the provisions of section 54 of the land acquisition act. the question whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2002 (HC)

Perry Bottling Company Vs. S.S. Soda and Soft Drinks Company and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2003(26)PTC555(Raj); RLW2003(1)Raj77; 2002(3)WLC333; 2002(2)WLN593

..... to the learned counsel for the respondents, the work or the words 'fruit beer' is not invention of the plaintiff otherwise the plaintiff would have got its registration under the patents act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1970'). i perused the various provisions of the act of 1970 also. section 6 of the act of 1970 provides the ..... persons who are entitled for submitting application for getting patent under the act of 1970, as provided under the act of 1958, the provisions are there in the act of 1970 for giving ..... damages in case of infringement of the patent right of patentee.17. the learned counsel for the respondents could not point out that how the person holding registration under the act of 1958, cannot maintain a suit for ..... patent to the inventors of their work. section 48 of the act of 1970 confers exclusive right to make, use, exercise, sell or distribute the invention of the patent. section 108 of the act of 1970 empowers the court to grant injunction and relief of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //