Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan Year: 1986 Page 2 of about 15 results (0.014 seconds)

Mar 18 1986 (HC)

R.S.E.B., Vidyut Bhawan Vs. the Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd., New Delh ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-18-1986

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN191

..... its jurisdiction or the case is one in which the court ought to have exercised the jurisdiction or further that in exercising the jurisdiction the court has acted illegally in patent breach of some provision of law or with material irregularity by committing error of procedure. the question in the instant case about entertaining the revision is regarding admission of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1986 (HC)

Navratan JaIn Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-28-1986

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN671

guman mal lodha, j.1. the appellant, navratan jain, has filed this appeal against the judgment of the trial court where by he has been convicted and sentenced as under:under section 18(i)(iv) and section 18(c) 1 years ri with a fine3 of rs. 1000/-read with section 27 of the drugs and in default, 4 month ri.cosmetics acts, 19402. according to the prosecution, on 23-11-1975 noon, a.h. sarswat (pw 1) drug inspector, kota, inspected the shop of the appellant in village raipur. the inspection was of m/s navratan mal bachhraj where the appellant was present. allopathic drugs exhibited for sale were available there. the documents of purchase and sale were demanded by the inspector but the appellant failed to produce them. he also failed to produce licence. 20 species of medicines of drugs were found in the shop which were sealed.3. a complaint then was filed against the accused in the court of munsif & judicial magistrate, jhalawar, who committed the accused to the courts of sessions for trial.4. the trial court, after trial, found the accused-appellant guilty under section 18(1 )(vi) & 18(c) r/w section 27 of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 and sentenced as mentioned above. hence this appeal.5. shri biri singh, the learned counsel for the appellant, has argued that the medicines recovered from the shop of the accused were not meant for sale, and there was not contravention of the provisions of chapter iv of the drugs and cosmetics act.6. it was submitted that there was one .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1986 (HC)

Mst. Bano Alias Chidi Bano and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-23-1986

Reported in : 1986WLN(UC)701

..... girl of tender age of about 14-16 years was obviously for dancing so that she can serve the customers for prostitution.12. shri tibrewal, confronted with the above obvious, patent and clear evidence, submitted that the girl was not proved to be below 18 years of age. here again the evidence that she was below 18 years, is clinching and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 14 1986 (HC)

Abhay Kumar and Co., Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-14-1986

Reported in : (1986)54CTR(Raj)188; [1987]164ITR148(Raj); [1986]63STC203(Raj)

a.k. mathur, j. 1. in all this batch of writ petitions, a common question of law and fact has been raised. therefore, they are disposed of by a single order. 2. in these writ petitions, principal submissions have been made, one regarding the validity of section 44ab and section 271b of the income-tax act and second, regarding interpretation of 44ab and 271b of the income-tax act. sections 44ab and 271b were introduced by the finance act of 1984, which read as under : '44ab. every person,-- (a) carrying on business shall, if his total sales, turnover or gross receipts, as the case may be, in business exceed or exceeds forty lakh rupees in any previous year or years relevant to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of april, 1985, or any subsequent assessment year; or (b) carrying on profession shall, if his gross receipts in profession exceed ten lakh rupees in any previous year or years relevant to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of april, 1985, or any subsequent assessment year, get his accounts of such previous year or years audited by an accountant before the specified date and obtain before that date the report of such audit in the prescribed form duly signed and verified by such accountant and setting forth such particulars as may be prescribed: provided that in a case where such person is required by or under any other law to get his accounts audited by an accountant, it shall be sufficient compliance with the provisions of this section if such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 1986 (HC)

Surendra Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-01-1986

Reported in : 1986WLN(UC)458

1. these two appeals are directed against the judgment of the learned additional sessions judge no. 1, kota, convicting the accused appellant and sentencing them as under: surendra singh under section 302 read with section 149 ipc gyan s/o tikam chand imprisonment for life and under section 148 ipc, gijju, bhooriya and 2 years ri. chander girraj ghoda under section 307 ipc 4 years r.i.2. according to the prosecution case, the occurrence took place at about 10.30 p.m. on 18-12-1978 when accused appellants and one co-accused khairati came in the hospital and committed murder of one raju who was admitted in the hospital due to some injuries. these accused persons also injured saboo (pw 4) who was attendant of his friend raju. the police received information and reached at the hospital and recorded the statement (ex. p. 2) of saboo (pw 4) on the basis of which a regular fir (ex.p 17) was registered at the police station nayapura, kota. the police registered a case under section 302, 307, 147, 148 and 149 ipc.3. the police after usual investigation submitted a challan in the court of judicial magistrate no. 1, kota who committed the case to the sessions and the learned additional session judge no. 1, kota, after trial convicted and sentenced the accused appellants as aforesaid and acquitted the accused khairati. it is against this judgment that these two appeals have been filed. since they arise out of the same incident and the same judgment, both are being disposed by this common .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //