Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 2004 Page 2 of about 108 results (0.132 seconds)

Nov 23 2004 (SC)

Shyam Oil Cake Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-23-2004

Reported in : 2004(97)ECC465; 2004(174)ELT145(SC); JT2004(10)SC518; (2005)2MLJ75(SC); 2004(9)SCALE641; (2005)1SCC264

..... , the separation of salt from earth or other substance so as to produce elementary salt, and the excavation or removal of natural saline deposits or efflorescence;(iii) in relation to patent or proprietary medicines as defined in item no. 14e of the first schedule and in relation to cosmetics and toilet preparations as defined in item no. 14f of that schedule .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2004 (SC)

Registrar, High Court of Gujarat and anr. Vs. C.G. Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-17-2004

Reported in : AIR2005SC344; 2004(5)CTC525; 2005(3)ESC346; (2005)1GLR649; JT2004(9)SC602; 2004(9)SCALE478; (2005)1SCC132; 2005(2)SLJ104(SC); (2005)1UPLBEC313

..... in law in permitting the respondent on second thought to address the court on merits about the standard of assessment of his performance. even in the memorandum of the letters patent appeal, the point that the high court had not applied the correct standard of assessment of the performance was not raised. the reasoning assigned by the division bench is, therefore ..... work done by him in comparison to his other colleagues when this point was not argued before the learned single judge or even raised in the memorandum of the letters patent appeal. the learned single judge has expressly indicated in his judgment that no other points were urged save and except about the interpretation of the relevant rule. the division bench ..... the question of assessment of satisfactory performance of the work done by him as a civil judge. mr. l.n.rao, however, submitted that while exercising the power under letters patent appeal, the court is exercising the power under article 226 of the constitution of india. it is not sitting in appeal over the decision of the high court on the ..... (b) a government servant becomes eligible for being confirmed. holding so, the petition filed by mr. c.g. sharma was dismissed.6. being aggrieved, mr. c.g. sharma preferred letters patent appeal assailing the judgment of the learned single judge on three grounds:1) the first ground was that with the expiry of the period of two years of probation in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2004 (SC)

Dr. Manju Varma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-17-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC520(SC); 2004(178)ELT64(SC); [2005(2)JCR159(SC)]; 2004(9)SCALE463; (2005)1SCC73; (2005)1UPLBEC496

..... subordinate to it and competent to try and dispose of the same. similar power has been granted under the letters patent to chartered high courts to withdraw proceedings from any court within its jurisdiction to itself. thus clause 13 of the letters patent 1865 in relation to the calcutta high court provides:-'and we do further ordain, that the said high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2004 (SC)

Madhya Pradesh Special Police Establishment Vs. State of Madhya Prades ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-2004

Reported in : AIR2005SC325; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)262; 2005(1)ALD57(SC); 2004(5)CTC454; [2005(1)JCR98(SC)]; 2004(3)KLT856(SC); 2005(1)MPHT425; 2004(9)SCALE302; (2004)8SCC788; 2005(1)LC165(SC)

..... invoked on the facts of the case to enable the governor to act in his discretion.7. the appellants filed two letters patent appeals which have been disposed off by the impugned judgment. the division bench dismissed the letters patent appeals upholding the reasoning and judgment of the single judge. it must be mentioned that the authority of this court in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2004 (SC)

Dharma Prathishthanam Vs. Madhok Construction Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-02-2004

Reported in : AIR2005SC214; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)114; 2004(3)BLJR2295; 2004(5)CTC442; JT2004(9)SC335; (2005)1MLJ70(SC); RLW2005(1)SC151; 2004(9)SCALE205; (2005)9SCC686

..... period of limitation if the court finds that the award is void or directs a party to do an act which is prohibited by law or is without jurisdiction or patently illegal. we need not multiply the number of authorities on this point as an exhaustive and illuminating conspectus of judicial opinion is found to be contained in law of arbitration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2004 (SC)

Virender Singh Hooda and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-27-2004

Reported in : AIR2005SC137; 2005(1)ESC19; JT2004(9)SC293; 2004(9)SCALE120; (2004)12SCC588; 2005(3)SLJ421(SC); (2005)1UPLBEC680

..... writ of mandamus and prohibition directing the lic to act in accordance with the terms of settlement. the writ petition was allowed against the said judgment. lic preferred a letters patent appeal against said judgment. on the enactment of the amending act, the lpa was withdrawn. section 3 of 1976 amending act provided as follows:-'notwithstanding anything contained in the industrial ..... final. by the time lpa came up for hearing, the impugned act had already come into force and the life insurance corporation could, therefore, have successfully contended in the letter patent appeal, that, since the settlement, in so far as it provided that payment of annual cash bonus, was annihilated by the impugned act with effect from 1st april, 1975, class .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 2004 (SC)

J.P. Srivastava and Sons Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Gwalior Sugar Co. Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-2004

Reported in : AIR2005SC83; I(2005)BC142; (2005)2CALLT31(SC); [2004]122CompCas696(SC); (2004)4CompLJ467(SC); 2004(9)SCALE60; (2005)1SCC172; [2004]56SCL1(SC)

..... acts of oppression in respect and mismanagement of the company. consequently, a second petition was filed under sections 397 and 398 of the act by the appellants.15. a letters patent appeal was filed from the decision of the single judge before the division bench by the appellants. the division bench held that the filing of the consent along with application .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2004 (SC)

P.S. Sathappan (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC5152; 2004(5)CTC209; JT2004(8)SC464; (2005)1MLJ105(SC); RLW2005(1)SC19; 2004(8)SCALE601; (2004)11SCC672

..... 1 of the cpc.c) there is no inconsistency between section 104 read with order 43 rule 1 and the appeals under letters patent, as letters patent in any way does not exclude or override the application under section 104 read with order 43 rule 1 which shows that these ..... in the appeal against the ultimate decree in terms of section 105 thereof.nature and extent of power of the high court under letters patent :36. letters patent is a special statue but in the event of a conflict, as would appear from the discussions made hereinafter, the provisions of the ..... court exercising appellate jurisdiction, provided the judgment appealed against is not one which was preferred against an appellate order, meaning thereby that no letters patent appeal would lie against an order passed by a single judge in second appeal, or an order passed in revisional jurisdiction, the latter part ..... 1988]2scr1043 and dipak chandra ruhidas v. chandan kumar sarkar, : air2003sc3701 .52. even in the aforementioned cases also, it has been held that a letters patent appeal may be barred by implication.appeal under special statute:53. the question, however, may be different when an appeal is provided for under a special ..... election petition expressly provided under section 116a of the representation of the people act, it will be evident that a right of appeal under the letters patent had been held to have been taken away by necessary implication. (see n.p. ponnuswami v. returning officer. namakkal constituency and ors. 1952 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2004 (SC)

N. Balaji Vs. Virendra Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-05-2004

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR370; 114(2004)DLT304(SC); [2005(1)JCR130(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC449; 2004(8)SCALE528; (2004)8SCC312; (2005)1UPLBEC268

..... power can be interfered by the high court only if the order passed is violative of some fundamental or basic principle of justice and fair play or suffers from any patent or flagrant error. we do not find any such element present vitiating the exercise of power vesting in the central registrar to condone the delay and entertain an election dispute .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2004 (SC)

Shyam Sunder Kohli Vs. Sushma Kohli @ Satya Devi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-01-2004

Reported in : AIR2004SC5111; 2004(6)ALD80(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)59; 2004(6)ALT61(SC); 2004(4)AWC3206(SC); 2004(4)CTC774; 114(2004)DLT1(SC); II(2004)DMC586SC; [2004(4)JCR95(SC)]; JT2004(8)

..... . variava, j.1. special leave granted.2. heard parties.3. these appeals are against the judgment dated 14th august, 2002 of the delhi high court. by this judgment, two letters patent appeals have been disposed of.4. briefly stated the facts are as follows.the appellant and the respondent were married on 18th november, 1981. the appellant claims that the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //